Lynda Mac

This firm of solicitors Borneo Linnells who were said to represent my son,what an evil bed fellow Patrick Persusko was when he knowingly  he got into bed with the Social Services ,most important of all please take on board that both interested parties for court   never considered that should my son come out of remission from leukaemia in the future then  contact would be an serious matter or issue  when needing to finding a donor.

The arrogance of these professionals they just done what they know works in court and they done the exact same to us as they do to all families tear you apart, and make sure the contact breaks down  . They never once considered my son had cancer or any other options for his future .

They destroyed  another family whole so that a Non Resident Father could have a relationship with his son. FULL STOP !

The LG  Dale Wood Cafcass officer for court for the child must have done a runner with the file because they will not give it to me .

Would you take a look at these Cafcass Jokers !! They kept the file for private law case in 1999 as this was pulled for court and used in evidence in 2004- 2006.

This said, it was also around this time August 2004 that the expert Dr Sturge  and child’s solicitor Patrick Persusko were labelling me or hinting at the drop down list of things the expert specialized in shall we say.

Dr Sturges name is coming up a lot now in other cases with mothers telling me she is brought in for the final hearing.  Bearing in mind  this expert is so big that she is arrogant to send this fax in the first place .This is  SO leading and it is blatant labelling WITH INTENT !

Fact Finding the problem has to exist first it has to be there in the paperwork , not created for court fact finding which is our experience of closed court  .So let us look again at that fax below The doctor Dr Sturge  has  not read all the bundles, or met me either, the date on the fax and the appointment for meeting them is much later on but she is clearly stating what she is interested in looking at abnormal illness. My child has cancer and she has nothing on me ,I am being done under the criteria for emotional harm only at this stage but it will have to be doubled up to neglect so this 1 shoe will have to fit me too.

After Patrick Persusko (PP isnow a judge in MK) helped Dr Struge to find evidence which were comments left on file historic data that had been left dormant which had no bearing upon my ability to parent or give a good standard of care to my son .

The outcome was damning in so much they used of this historic data, which had no real bearing ,or concern at all about me ,but never the less was used for court to label me with the lighter label of MSBP. Finally all experts had to agree with this ,they said it was abnormal illness behaviour .

When in fact I think they seriously let my son down.The corporate parent& courts alike   should have concentrated on genetics ,and also the long term welfare interests of child C. Surely good old common sense should tell you that if nothing else.

Any decent parent would want to do their best ,or anything to improve matters or put something in for your child,no matter what that was.

Tell me this please do you see anyone representing adopted children to find a genetic key ?I do not see many adopted children being represented in law to find a genetic key.

The corporate parent has not bothered, and the blood parent is too stunned, or far to scared to do anything at all before the final hearing get it in the paperwork  make the solicitors work for their money . I know solicitor drain every ounce of energy out of you,please  do not accept the what is this genetic key they know what it is  ………

This looks to me like serious intent to label me what do you think? and not only that can you see how they are willing to help each too? Frightening to think this pack is waiting with a confident smile on their face for another unsuspecting family to fall into the machine . confident that they will win and you will lose your child .

This paperwork was all contributed to this blog by Coram & Cafcass and you the taxpayer paid for all of this case to the sum of £150 K or more.

These jokers that pass for professionals  better tell me they looked at the long term interests of my son . It is not asking too much that he gets the same chances that other children get when they have access to all of their blood family .

.http://www.waterlowlegal.com/directories/borneo-linnells-solicitors-1403279.ph

Social workers be mindful parents are blogging too. Some like myself  have even gone to the trouble of getting a website hosted in another country. Years ago parents dare not even read the lies that social workers wrote about their families in the paperwork . Now times have changed and we give lessons how to create bundles for court so these children can sue the Local Authority.

How do you think that social worker looks now .Julie Tadd wrote my son was not responding to treatment in 2005. What kind of message it that giving the general public now? My blog statistics were up and 30 + searches were for Julie Tadd  alone. The use of the blogs and the information is filtering down so fast to service users are becoming more informed about who exactly are these individuals working for social services and what are they really up to in child protection?

http://www.communitycare.co.uk/carespace/forums/a-childs-right-to-take-legal-action-what-is-the-6709.aspxAs I’ve recently blogged, much legal work in the UK has been done to promote the right to a child or young person to have their voices heard, from accepting the demands of the UN’s Convention on the Rights of the Child to the implementation of the Local Authority Social Services Department Children’s Representation Procedure [England] Regulations, which required local authorities to feed information on advocacy to young people, as well as explaining the important issues around representation and the complaints procedure.

Recent calls for children to be given the right to take legal action on a council that performs badly have sparked wild debate. Normal 0 false false false EN-GB X-NONE X-NONE Ian Johnston, former chief executive of the British Association of Social Workers, contributed to that debate by saying “here care falls below acceptable standards the children concerned should be entitled to seek redress and the process to secure compensation must be accessible and user friendly.”

Is this the general consensus among those who work in social work?