Lynda Mac

I am not feeling the best at the moment I came down with a bug last Sunday and have to wait for the results of the stool sample. I am told to wait for 2 weeks for the diarrhoea to stop ,then investigations will start, as I have a history of Ulcerative Colitis which there is no known cure. When the solicitors got hold of my medical bundles they or somebody gave a lead to Dr Claire Sturge to tell her I was a thick file patient and would be so easy to label with hypochondria. You decide if you would want your medical notes interpreted in such a way.

Then much later on into the final hearing stage ,you will be asked to take part and go look for funding or for CBT therapy you basically do not need. I am not a liar , I have not earner £150 an hour for lying either. I refused to pay a consultation fee of £250  or £100 an hour to the same expert witness for 2 years CBT therapy as guess what, Dr Wilkins told the judge that  nobody else but himself  would be able to carry out  this therapy !! Is that right?

In his reports for court  Dr Wilkins makes a point about there being no evidence of active UC ???? Dr Wilkins takes his argument up to 1988 for the court and stops there . The court do not know this they never accessed the medical bundles the experts did .I was having a serious problem with chronic UC which was resistant to all the other previously used mainline  drugs for this treatment, and I was prescribed Azathiaprine in 1992 . What, and who, more to the point are these so called experts doing operating in the Family courts? Time to expose the abuse of these psychiatrists and psychologists .

This blog will save me a lot of time ,and energy by posting the evidence, so my son C can have full medical disclosure . The other brother if asked are there any cases of bowel disease in the family he can say yes there is,however child C will say I was removed so do not know. This is why I lost my case in a closed court , because experts like theses rule these kangeroo courts. Sadly there is no known cure for corruption , just like this bowel disease which they say is genetically linked to other people in the family you just have to live with it. I never knew it was acceptable to be called a liar in closed courts for having this is  when is pathology never accepted? Question for you : WHEN IS PATHOLOGY TRASHED?

Trial 4 The lighter label of MSBP

When it is a closed kangeroo court and  Dr Claire Sturge is the main expert witness that is when the stupid judge listens to her evidence and not to medical facts.

I personally think the general public are blinkered when it comes to what goes on in public law cases. “The FACT THAT CHILD ABUSE HAS BEEN RECLASSIFIED “the fact is , that any family is fair game to this allegation of emotional harm there is no real criteria at all.  The general public do not understand this, or the legal consequences that follow this allegation, they certainly  would not put up with it.

So as a result of this not understanding what emotional harm is , and not until much later on then the “WORD SIGNIFICANT RISK OF EMOTIONAL HARM IS ADDED TO STATEMENTS” other naive parents are just as likely to fall into the same trap after a practitioner makes the first move by making a referral to social services.

There is a lot of talk about emotional harm ,but nobody knows what it really means or the costs involved when this is used for court, there was a discussion going on about courts ,and also what happened to contact post court  on Wikivorce  site , I later  got run off” Wikivorce”  first I was asked not to talk about mothers losing custody and was getting loads of hits blogging about this experience of  getting no contact, or very little contact .

Then out of the blue  there was a ding  dong if you could call it that,  as a young barrister pipes up and  said,”your case is public case”. I pointed out it started out in private and could end up in criminal court if this continues.

Whether we like it or not  the preconception is ” public case law is widely accepted you are guilty of something”. I was mug enough to concede to “emotional harm threshold” they doubled this with neglect at the 11th hour I never saw this one coming, me being done for “neglect”.  This is after  I originally complained about my son’s care in Addenbrooke’s hospital in 2004 . The web master deleted the comments.

Coming back to the neglect allegation , the courts are quick  enough to act on minor false allegations , but not so big they can admit finding of fault . The over all long term interests of my son are not clearly defined ,or the medical histories clear. The experts could not agree at one stage. So how the hell can we have confidence in these private courts ,where  an expert can step out of their field of expertise?

I think the dereliction of duty of care for the child and also neglect is with the courts to decide in the future surrounding his long term interests to find all options for contacts to family to find a genetic key.

Coming back to this genetic key ,nobody is really that interested in this issue ,until it is too late.This specific issue that nobody cares to mention( Your right to find data which is your genetic key from either your( key holder is) mother or you father should you need this. When, or “IF ” you become acutely ill.)http://www.adonorforgraham.com/

Here is a task for some think tank politician who is still interested in promoting all members of  people in society from all races , classes regardless of gender  the adopted class are a faceless group of people who otherwise have been marginalized from finding out their true heritage. That can not be right,let ahttp://www.channel4.com/news/articles/uk/social networking sites threaten adoption policy/3656647lone fair. then again that is draconian rule for you. Closed court never open corrupt forced adoption cases so that critically ill adults/or children can find a donor. “Death by Adoption”.

Research the up to date figures for children in care and post me a comment .

Research how many children a year get leukaemia or cancer post me a comment.

Research me a more realistic figure for adopted children as I do not accept that most children go home .

Then you have the real figure for a small group of people in society who are most at risk of not being able to find a donor .

1) The adoption agency and the NHS told me this. The GP’s in some cases won’t give out information when somebody is searching.

2) I am experiencing this with my sons GP have done for 6 years now.

3)It takes more than 8 weeks going through the Adoption Agencies and involves paying a fee.

4) Sometimes you do not have the time to wait for people to come forward that is why a global database needs to be done for children/adults who are not on a National register as donors or living in the UK.

This is a good enough specific issue to return to court I have a section 91/14 running until November 2010 Dale Wood the child’s legal guardian recommended that the judge give out this order as I got better at this court stuff than the legals anticipated then if you have had the misfortune like me to be kept hanging around the RCJ floating waiting for  your case to be heard then re-directed back to a judge who will just do you no questions asked, you get a very good at  reading the body language of these legal sharks, you know when you are being taken for a ride on their gravy train and that is another FACT !

Make no doubt about this :these courts need a shove into the 21st century as experts have not really been honest enough to come forward and let in the public into a public law court or private law court,and show their handy work for what it is. I might as well be stupid enough to  step up to the plate as nobody else is going to bother, Seen as I have experienced a child suddenly get ill and then the child being removed from my care and watch him living somewhere else with another family ,coping to live with leukeamia .This is not an adoption case ,but the rift is just as massive believe me . 

The long term interest are not considered to find a stem cell donor or a bone marrow donor for adopted children if they are and I have it wrong send me a link to a case online I am interested to know. I bet there is no case at all. The courts would rather write a case of the mental capacity of a parent well they are on a need to know basis and you know what? They do not need to know or be told anything at all.

Now as a mother who has be labeled with abnormal illness I find that odd. Adopted children/adults  have to wait and also note pay out a fee  to find a donor. The quarter of donors who are  most likely to be a match for them will be found in their birth parents fullstop.

As for the latest guidelines from the GMC I have to say this. I personally have got a doctor or a consultant to thank for the dilemma I am in for the duration until there is resolution of some sort. So you can say I have lost confidence in these proposals suggested. More than likely the GMC media had to do something about this issue with so many people online campaigning and discussing other adopted children/ adults rights to find the answers and how long that takes in a critical situation.

Your rights to find a donor.

e-mail from the GMC

Hello Linda,

Stephanie McNamara
Head of Media Relations
General Medical Council
350 Euston Road
London
NW1 3JN

Direct dial: 020 7189 5454 / 5444 (out of hours) Mobile: 07899793287

Recently I took a break and I mean a break,have you noticed this ,you never get time off from the paperwork?

The professionals are always taking time off for  a holiday,the good old taxpayers are paying for the holiday ,and next all that is required is the naive client , who can be caught off guard because simply  they have been totally terrorized by social services getting a care order to remove their  child from their care.

I confess to having an interest in how it all comes together ,this collating of facts and evidence especially as the system has failed so many children who have died . I am not using the poor child’s name in the case of ……

What with no media still allowed in a court , and the threat of do not show your paperwork this would be a reality tv programme worth making as a matter   for the general public interest . Forget that it will never happen.I guess your next  wish would be just like  mine would be ,if  I could be a fly on the wall in the offices of these  so called practitioners  and experts and observe them at work. I doubt in reality and not in our life time we will be able to  see how they work or collate the paperwork for court  all that we know is this , it is a mess and it is not lawful either. Now how come there is no watchdog to turn to regarding complaint’s,this  urgently needs to check out this system, as the professionals are all alike in so much as the  professionals all use the same old template for destroying or long term labeling parents for court.

I do  wonder why I bother some days  to share this information,then I remember the day I left Dr Claire Sturge’s Family centre  clinic in Gayton Road,Harrow  & Dr Anthony Wilkins office rented out by the hour in Edward House Lisson Grove .Dr Sturges clinic it was stock piled with families with children waiting to be seen  in the waiting area at the front of a run down property . Dr Wilkins temporary   offices in Lisson Grove there were 2 people waiting . Dr Wilkins has his offices in Windsor, he also has a  previous warning on the GMC website……

Then I remembered   what she done to me ,and how I felt walking down the road away from the clinic ,with an awful feeling of  utter despair, and feeling totally emotionally  exhausted.

I also noted that this feeling had taken days at first then months then years  until it dawned on me ,then I admitted to myself there is no  finally getting over the reports for court or losing your child ever.

Then in May 2005  the 3rd expert who was cherry picked , we trust you do not need his CV …….this   next  question came up ” do you feel hopeless” it was asked by  by Graham Flatman I knew what he meant , but I said no to this question as they all made an expensive effort to destroy all hope .

Some days I was on that roller coaster  going up and down , I could be standing  on the platform waiting for the tube in London somewhere being ordered to go see these bullies or I would be on a Virgin transatlantic flight to somewhere getting away from it all. Next week I have to send in the report to the HPC ,hindsight is a great thing if I had never listened to the barrister when she used undue  influence on me I would not be here 6 years later doing the complaints as a method of exhausting all domestic remedies  to go to COA ……….

There is  another letter  I can post ,which was sent out to this GP look at the date, he is not going to hand over the medical notes. The contents of that letter are saying to him “it is surprising there is so little paperwork for his patient who attends Addenbrookes & cared shared 2nd hospital Luton & Dunstable from my solicitor Liz Oldham” What is in there I could show the GMC facts surrounding what my son had and what medication he has been administered whilst an expert witnesses says that I have harmed my son. The rest is evidence and will not be discussed on here otherwise the file will be destroyed.

I have read numerous times that your medical notes go over to experts but get this  your  ex-partners medical file notes will go walk about . Missing in transit or hardly anything is in the bundles  heading for kangeroo court. Yours are used only and then any future request for more paperwork looking for evidence  for complaint’s and you will be stonewalled.

The Local Authority should do random drug tests as the staff are either on something, or  just liars ,look at the comments about phone calls…..

This is the bottom line you are being set up . Keep your eye on your solicitors or where the paperwork ended up as you may need it for court of appeal. I read in Sally Clarks book somebody was prosecuted for non-disclosure of evidence. They knew there was evidence to prove her innocence of how 1 of her sons died. “STOLEN INNOCENCE “author John Batt.

It is high time somebody is prosecuted for delaying or for not disclosing  evidence for court. I am so pissed off with Cafcass ,Luton Social Services and this GP . he knows what it is I want . If I can not have the copies of my sons medical notes for court then tell the GMC “WHY NOT “.

http://amasci.com/weird/skepquot.html

The Social Service do not need a court order to stop your contact so when people tell you they need a court order before the SS can stop contact they are wrong . The final hearing was held same week . This is why so many families do not get how the care plan’s are changed last minute or at the 11th hour……..

Most of all they have not been honest with C where he is going to live , or for how long or what is so wrong with his mother that she can no longer look after him.

There is no time like the present to tell the truth ,but have you noticed how a social worker can not tell the truth or be truthful about care plans? There is no time in a social workers life time or a Cafcass officers working day to respect the child’s wishes and feelings when typing out the welfare check list  .

This is the same social worker that wants an injunction she has had a TC= telephone conversation with Dale Wood Cafcass .

1) Fact anyone can stop your contact working for Social Services even a family aid can make suggestions.

2) Anyone working for Social Services can tell your child whatever they chose to tell them about why the contact has stopped.

3) The way my son reacted when he saw me ,he must have been told I was dead or worst in a mental asylum seriously ill.

4) These TC ‘s took over 2 years to get using DPA 40 days from Luton Social Services  make sure you get to see all your paperwork and request  these TC’s ………

Is it any wonder these scum bags are frightened and in need of an injunction?

Anyone can see your children apart from you quote :”Real Fathers for Justice “http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/7728931/Britains-child-snatchers-are-a-scandal.html.

That means anyone in prison on a long stretch , oh well at least it is supervised hey ?

What is the difference between  the blogging  world ,and then writing about the family courts, in the media? What does the  mainstream journalism have left to offer now these bloggers have arrived?? These 2 blogs survived whilst the other bloggers  over on the right hand side of the home page who discussed Labour Party Politics about guidelines for families and child protection were removed from the public domain.

hthttp://order-order.com/tp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8677492.stm

The difference is:bloggers are more likely than not going to  get shut down,or threatened  with prison if they continue to write. Please feel free to check the links to the right  on the home page ,there have so far been 3 bloggers that have been shut down.

May I ask what good it did running that camapign about the family courts in the Timesonline and all those wasted hours spent traveling up to

We have our own Judge let her in we want justice in the court

the House of Commons for either protests or meetings ,with both the MP’s & parents. I am so not feeling the work these MP’s  say they “DO” as printed  on their own website it says “They work for us”. We have only experienced this ,the MP’s know how to  pay lip service to us and quickly give you that look at the clock on the wall look,which means  I really do have to go now  ….. ,that is about the bottom line.

Just take a look at the answers from MP’s on this website are a sham they do not know where the figures for statistics are kept or anything.

You could say that they are only fit for purpose in so much as they could find the expenses form, that is about it really.

http://www.theyworkforyou.com/

Whilst a journalist can say that the Timesonline have a campaign running about the Family courts we can not say the same and expect to get away with  a legitimate campaign either online or in public .

Maybe it is too sensitive to be writing ,even exposing the paperwork used to legally kidnap children from loving parents whose children had no right being forcibly removed in the first place.

As you can see from this blog I have not airbrushed the raw data concerning the paperwork has not been tampered with except to delete the identity of the child.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/camilla_cavendish/article5854230.ece

Whilst Camilla can be seen to be getting her awards  for writing about a campaign by the Times for literally writing round about the court cases .Forgive me but there is no passion or feeling or bloody paperwork in the news article.. For a professional journalist to think it is acceptable to accept an award for writing second hand about a subject  then not being able to exhibit paperwork which  was generated by a public body  social services which has set wheels in motion as it sets out to destroy yet another  family and tear it apart . The best that the media can do is a pathetic job if it can not persuade the general public by now to vote to open the family courts.

http://www.ukcolumn.org/I personally decided I would have to blog and expose if people are to really wake up to this corruption,then  the general public need to know so that they can avoid a mountain of paperwork handed out to replace the child that used to live in their home.

They  need to know how much room this paperwork you will need to store. Then the problems of accessing more paperwork as it never adds up for court some of the vital evidence is missing.If you could see the the paperwork which is documented about you that is kept on your family you would be shocked . Then  to find out there noting resembling a  right to justice or a fair trial .

There is nothing printed in any paper giving you any realistic picture of what will happen next .The media do not even hint how bad it really is in a kangeroo court . There are hardly any families we know get to appeal their cases.

You will be too far gone  at this stage to appreciate what it is the media are not allowed to inform you ,or are not telling you about the scandal surrounding parents who say the same they have been a victim of miscarriage of justice.

If you live in an average 2 bed semi-detached house, then  average space needed to store your paperwork is 6- 7 boxes per child. So you can expect to fill your living space of at least 1 bedroom with plastic boxes as it starts to smell out your house  if left hanging around long term for 5- 6 years is the average court time to resolve contact issues.

I keep on looking at that Clic leaflet £5 for a nurse to help a family so a child could wake up in his or her own bed. Really as little as £5  ? Then why the £150 K on court costs ,meetings , and a retainer for foster care just incase the placement never works out.?

Why waste all these resources on a case with no previous  child protection concerns . When the money could have been spent on a family that needs it more than us?.How come it takes longer to pay out the travel costs if you are the child’s parent traveling to hospital , but you can clearly see how easily a foster carer or a social worker can get their fees paid? Why do you have to keep quiet when your child is so upset about the stupid trainers a foster carer has bought him? Why if these children are said to be  ” LOOKED AFTER CHILDREN” did I have to pay over £3,000 to provide him with what was missing from the foster care package to keep up some kind of normality for my son?

What would you do with £5 in the winter months during contact in Luton? I  have refused the £5 I should with hindsight took it out of the hand of the Local Authority and gave it to Clic  Sargent so some other child could be fortune to stay at home.

I have signed a working agreement not knowing how many thousands of pounds it is going to cost me and nearly result in getting a criminal record. Fact never sign the working agreement with SS.

Here is a fine for traveling on British Rail without a ticket. I almost got a criminal record. Luton SS  gave me a set time for supervised contact something like 10.00 am – 11.00am travelling from Luton to Cambridge. They never tell the multi-agency get the bus do they? They get paid £300 to put backsides on seats in council offices attending ICO meetings . Why should the parents get offered bus fare only?

I could leave a space here :and post the letter from Addenbrookes chest clinic saying that I needed to attend urgent out patient appointments. at the time . My diary was penciled in and out as I flitted like a mental health patient on speed to one location or meeting on any given day. The professionals on most days had  double booked meetings which clashed with emergencies later like blood transfusions for C and still the retard social worker offered bus fare only.

The financial burden of not being supported in the working agreement by Luton social services from get go cost me approximately £3,000 and more besides when traveling to contact and eventually sent me bankrupt in the process.

Somebody should also warn you, what this is like, being exposed to serious long term stressful  situations. Parents should be helped to identify the  un-workable arrangements they are being set up for for court . Then someone needs to show the new social services victim,just   how to cope with the trigger factors that lead up to neglecting your own health ,when working with social services .

Please watch your backs when you get to this stage.This part is very cleverly designed to finally make you out to be the label they are planning to set you up for with the experts witnesses . There is a lot of neuro lingistic programming used on route by some of these professionals which I will have to leave until another post . Ths part is very uncomfortable and it is difficult to long term be spoken to like this . You know what I mean it is the special way the social worker and the expert witness cuts you up constantly in conversation. Long term it is very clever as it sets you up on a daily basis to harm you,undermine your parenting skills ,also your thought processing skills to deal with problems.

For the majority of families the significant  amount of disruption in the early days of  losing custody  of your child/children to the corporate parent.For many families they will not be able to ride out the long term disruption in time off work. Which will lead up to not being able to provide for your family if you lose your job as you can not keep up with the meetings and so many 10 minutes court dates for directions  hearings ……

Sadly most people would  not be able to cope psychologically or keep up physically without something else going wrong for them within the 42 weeks timescale.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8675966.stm“It was understood that oxytocin release in the context of social bonding usually required physical contact,” said Dr Leslie Seltzer of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, who led the research.

There is no respect for private Family life  .The first thing they do is break the children down with no phone calls home. The criminals here in the UK prison’s have more human rights,and much better comfort  than these children in foster care have or in contact centres .

Within hours of sending this letter C was taken  ill ,so my instincts as a mother were right about him coming down with something. I was  told C was netrapenic,  at risk of picking up an infection which can be life threatening to children with leukeamia ,when their immune system is so weak with the intensification of the treatment.

noun Medicinethe presence of abnormally few neutrophils in the blood, leading to increased susceptibility to infection. It is an undesirable side effect of some cancer treatments.

What is it going to cost to have contact after school which is a 3 minute walk away from  our home? It will cost Yvonne Crawford ex -social worker or Purple Professionals how much an hour ? £25 – £50 an hour……..

This comes out of local government ,just how many contact centres need to be filled, and  how much a year do they make ?

Well it is only the taxpayers money and my child we are paying for with this with so it does not matter.  This is about making money not child protection.

My final statement is very close at hand , for those that have seen it already the Luton Social Services have yet to say what it is I am a risk to my son of .If I have un-supervised contact. Cardolyn Hill is not even a social worker either and she is recommending that I stay long term in a contact centre to see my son.

The DO’s & Don’ts life is not long enough to contemplate those and my sanity is worth so much more and the welfare of my son is worth so much more.

I would rather no relationship with my son than supervised bullying at £25 – £50 an hour. My message to my son is you are better off playing with your friends outside than being exposed to this crap.