Oct 28 2009

The Incentive to Swallow A Child Whole

http://order-order.com

I think I should take Guido Fawkes lead, track down the Caffcass Officer who has run off  with our file an see what property she lives in now in her retirement. Then we could back track the child’s solicitor  Patrick Perusko who is now a judge in Milton Keynes. This blogging sure gets out the information  out concerning these professionals for closed court. The average people  using a search engine will find your story or paperwork what  these professionals have done to your family.  The media are trawling all of the social networking sites looking for your story even if they are gagged as much as we are. At long last MP’s are picking up that their days are numbered for playing dumb,just  what the social services are  getting up to with judges behind closed doors. Yesterday a mother posted up to as the paperwork you can go to prison for disclosing to anyone outside of court. I do not blame her for doing this now. On mass the people on facebook deserve to be shown the level of corruption of the scandal an shame on you MP’s for not doing anything to help families like us.

Apart from that is John Hemming MP who come out to help families . www.Justiceforfamiliesforum


Oct 20 2009

Airborne Infections Still Eligible 4 MSBP.

So it is very rare and only 4 cases in 5 years are heard of  arising out of an  infection.Then why was it necessary to label me with the MSBP? if this was an infection which  is airborne .This is what the expert witness labelled me with, making my child ill, which is what a MSBP mother does ,makes the child ill by faking the symptoms and treating them with medication the child does not need.

I have just e-mailed the lead person at Addenbrooke’s concerning this short report on the 4 cases in 5 years of children who have presented with normal chest infections. This blog comes in very handy to post all the comments that people want to avoid answering.All I really want to know is this:  as my child went through the same hospital with the same symptoms until he had an X-Ray  this then confirmed a mass on the left  side of his chest. I would so like to know are they now discussing twin tracking mothers for MSBP to court so that they can study these rare cases.Addenbrookes has a lot of funding an their own research centre in the hospital.

Marks out of 10 please I am interested to know how I  performed as a mother with a child who turned out to be acutely ill.I have said this all along without my co-operation with the medical staff they would not have had a subject to study end of.

http://resources.metapress.com/pdf-preview.axd?code=u034l5tjl14681h3&size=largest


Oct 19 2009

My son is 1 out of 4 cases reported a chest infection.

Not asking much.I have just been sent a reminder to take part in a radio show tonight.”When Truth is Ignored in Favour of Blame” is anyone else from the forums going on tonight .Please be aware we are 5 hours ahead.I find it hard to post about the experience of finding out that your child has leukeamia as if I am honest like most people do on Christmas morning they  turned off from the subject of   sick children in hospital, that is unless it is your children then you will have an interest…

I want to appeal to the foster carers an adoptive parents ask them how impressed they will be to find out what we already know about this system that says it cares about children. Moving on now .

I get asked what did you do to get in this mess? The first person to ask this question was from my 7 year old son? C said if it was not for me getting cancer you would not have got in trouble now, this is more like  the truth .On the one hand you will have a doctor create blame then observe the other doctor say or do nothing when they know full well what is right an what is morally wrong with causing harm to a child by putting them into care when they willingly know that the way forward is to blame an innocent parent. “These Doctors Who Remove Your Children”!

In 2004 we were about to set off on a 14 day holiday in the Canary Islands , on and off my son was complaining of back ache the school rang me  to collect him.The next thing was, I took him to see the nurse as an emergency appointment at short notice. Looking at the court bundles the paperwork looks doctored or flows like head teachers an the other parent fell out of law school as the statements are churned out fast an thick.As I went through the step by step process of being set up for the lighter label of MSBP these so called professionals forgot the most important thing of all the long term interests of the child contact.

Not only is the biological parent set up so it the adoptive parent  especially if they do not have a full disclosure of the family held medical history.You never know what blood you are getting is so right. Never forget this !

My main objective is to point out the problems a parent will be having when  dealing with diagnosis an with the problem of finding a donor for the child/adult who has lost contact post final hearing after the set up stage. The real facts are it takes far to long going through the system again an it costs too much money .

Let us look at how your going to be blame for court. You know when your child is ill or has asthma? You take the child to the doctors right? Yes I would if I was concerned if the child is ill or has symptoms. The MSBP mother is known to have taken the child to the GP a lot. This is not true for us I have written evidence. This did not stop a doctor in closed court saying that my son never had asthma.The expert witness in our case is Dr  Claire Sturge who must be in her 80′s now.In her evidence she described a typical MSBP mother who liked to give medicine to a child who did not need it ,Dr Sturge said I over dosed my son on the return journey back to the UK with asthma inhalers . I thought my son had croup or a bad chest infection he had a history of asthma. This is taken from a Springer link type in Addenbrooke’s hospital childhood leukaemia ………….Abstract.In short you could have a child presenting with a normal infection an it could be a massive tumor on their chest just like my son here in the photo . I did not know an neither did the doctors until the X-rayed him in the L& D hospital .

Introduction  Leukaemia and lymphoma may present with symptoms and signs mimicking common respiratory conditions of childhood such as asthma or croup. The UK National Institute for Clinical Excellence guidelines for referral for suspected cancer state that “the primary healthcare professional should be ready to review the initial diagnosis in patients in whom common symptoms do not resolve as expected” and “must be alert to the possibility of cancer when confronted by unusual symptom patterns” (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2005).
Results and discussion  A child with an undiagnosed mediastinal mass presenting with signs and symptoms suggestive of asthma or croup may be given oral systemic steroids. We report four such illustrative cases presenting to a single institution within the last 3 years.
Conclusion  We highlight key points from the history and examination findings which should lead to review of the original diagnosis, the benefit of early chest X-ray in such cases and the dangers of steroid pretreatment.

Keywords  Asthma - Cancer - Chest X-ray - Croup - Leukaemia - Lymphoma

I found this link last night the doctors who treated my son in Addenbrooke’s hospital  now write a paper on these cases  . This is how Mediiastinal masses masquerading as common respiratory conditions of childhood:a case series. Available to buy online


Oct 17 2009

Political Bill Board or Bust You Decide!

Tag: Uncategorizedadmin @ 5:38 am

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/article6878717.ece Message to Mark Potter you are a coward who is also worried about what the general public  will see .What really goes on in court. Rubber stamp this you sold out children& families. It is not in your hands anymore as families are united in saying what is really going on. The media have been gagged as well as the families trouble is the more they gag the more the families blurt all over social networking forums.

Political Bill Board or Bust You Decide!Political Bill Board or Bust You Decide ! It is very hard to be taken seriously with being burdened with huge real tits = HRT  the change of life  I am wondering now why is it I do not sit up here in my bra an use my assets to blog an increase the political debate on transparency in the family courts or lack of it. I would like you to leave all the comments in my inbox on Facebook that the Timesonline will not allow in reply to this article.

Fathers for Justice wear the outfits to get attention in the run up to the next election please circulate this message to  the Mothers For Justice come on girls get out the armor . Make a political statement if it is takes off I want a cut out of the T-shirt promotion  for taking off your T- shirt to protest for opening up the closed family courts.


Oct 14 2009

Bare Faced Lies From Martin Narey!

The last time I saw Clive Anderson was  outside of the  London Dungeon  as he walked past me sometime last year ,he had on a black turtle neck sweater and black trousers.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00n9mdf/The_One_Show_12_10_2009/

There was also a young man working the crowd  as the crowd were waiting in the long queue for the London Dungeon attraction. This man was in a cloak  with a horrible prop  which was a bloody head on a stick . I took a photo for my son on my mobile phone  but not 1 of Clive Anderson . I caught up with theBBC One Showlast night  Clive  Anderson was on there  along with Martin Narey from the Barnado’s Charity. Jesus the bare faced lies from Mr Narey so naughty  Mr Narey but  so “sincere with it to mash up the adoption figures”. Then again it is only  a business, it is not about support or helping families, if it is it is helping the wrong families the 1′s that can not be fixed just not fixing us families the 1′s who can cook  budget an take apart in costly court cases an attend every meeting for social services. The families who are clever enough to ask questions about the central government hand outs for adoption cases.

I was always a big fan of Clive  Anderson he told it how it was on his programme what was the title of this programme?it has slipped my mind.I remember this though Clive  said he thought “Margaret Thatcher was a glove puppet for the bankers,  she was a distraction put up front “, whilst the bankers took all of the money out of the country.

Clive Anderosn was right about this .The parents who have been through the system of doing core assessments for court would say this about   Mr Narey an the rest of the charities they are using similar tactics for their own ends….

The real figures we want you to know simply as  a public interest matter.  These MP’s  say they do not know where they are. The real  facts for  serious issues regarding child protection they can not cover even the basics of or the mainstream media are not so stupid they are told to cover only issues like child protection like this.

This is where we come in as parents first , we are experts as we have seen behind the scenes .The MP’s are frightened to sit in a room with us campaigners an take the grilling about the faults that want fixing and who can blame them really.

If you have learnt anything from reading this blog it is how useless they are in dealing http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/oct/02/martin-narey-banardos-child-protection   with families get back their children from social services or adoption. There are literally a file  box full of letters to my own MP Kelvin Hopkins dating back nearly 5 years now.

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/looked_after_children_352#incoming-48203So what has changed ? Nothing has changed except I have met more distraught families who have just lost their cases and their children.


Oct 14 2009

Question 4 Martin Narey from Morbaldy.

Does this child have access to a genetic key?

I am delighted to see someone asking this question. I would say to Morbaldy get out here get stuck in traffic this is the only way to have your say. Is it me or are we being blanket bombed by the media promoting the charities for child protection issues which are necessary to validate the reason to keep the figure for children being taken for adoption.

I for 1 am sick of it. In so much I would never expect the media to print this story.The GMC have only recently changed the guidelines for  genetic disclosure.This is down to the campaigners kicking off about the rights for children in care or adopted…

The long term interests are not even skimmed concerning right to life for all children being removed long term or off for a speedy adoption in The 1989 children Act.The families now coming through the system better get this message and get it quick. File the position statements for court you want the same rights for your children.

If you do not do this for your child  or have any concept about the risks of cancer or have even bothered to  taken onboard the statistics. The same government statistics from Cancer Research UK the funding for these charities  which has probably been given to these charities then use this an say, it is your data.They can not contradict the data they have commissioned.

Leukaemia is the biggest killer of children in the UK the BBC News highlighted this recently on their  website. They conveniently forgot to show what is in place for looked after children in care or adopted children & adults long term.

Is this because they do not value Children  as having an identity or a legal personality? or are these children  a mere commodity to the local authorities to claim money from central government to ship out of the country for adoption placements abroad?

http://justiceforfamilies.freeforums.org/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/theoneshow/feedback/thankyou.shtml I have just sent the BBC One Show a message for you Morbaldy.
Did anyone manage to see the one show tonight, Martin Narey from Barnados was on there saying the usual nonsense, but something striking me was a mis-conceived comment regarding the number of babies put up for adoption, I missed half the conversation and only caught the latter half.

Martin had said that a few years ago over 4,000 babies were adopted yearly, last year the figure was only 127, yes this low.

I am wondering if anyone knows a way in which we could challenge the BBC to the figures Martin was quoting, hell I have dealt with 13 cases last year lone where adoption was sought for babies this quoted figure I am positive is seriously wrong.

Quoting figures like this could cause issues when the general public would see the problems with forced adoption is not as high as it has been perceived by Martin.

He was saying that Barnardos supports countless families with problems and thus avoiding the care proceedings process.

Clive Anderson was also on there as well and he made some really good remarks and tried to defend the parents as best he could, talked more sense than Martin.

I am not sure if the show can bee seen on the BBC i Player.

Any Ideas???
mobaldy2005
Site Admin
Posts: 758
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 11:34 pm

Oct 13 2009

What Do We Know Verses What Do They Know ?

Here is a link to http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/ I am too busy to play along with this but will find time to leave a question about adopted children or adults concerning rights to find a stem cell donor.Moving on to what we know about the courts, the experts, social services an the multi-agency gathering.We know a lot an can pass over the information very quickly if you need help,all  you need is the motivation to do this, from there you will be picked up an given a lifeline to a survival pack which is free.

This is what we know how to use the internet ,and most important who is who an where the data  is to help you get the results you need.

Families like  us ex-service users  know what you are going through ,we know how to help you to cope with the long term stress . We know as we have gone through it an come out the other end.If it was not for us families  who have gone through the system, families would not survive . You are not meant to survive ,this is a judicial system that kills people.  Sally Clark was another  innocent mother accused of killing her children .Sally was not a DV victim ,however the system can make you look anyway it wants to in so much as it is so corrupt to find false facts , trashed evidence in closed court trials in criminal an Family Division.What starts in Family can soon cross over to Criminal believe me .

We  can help you make a difference to your life,  how to cope with questions,the  forms  for court and endless applications for requests for paperwork under DOP . Only  you can  fight back,only you can  survive the depression, or separation anxiety which has been caused by the long term removal of your children, post family court proceedings there are so many cases it is hard to help families who are too far gone……

Well it sucks basically,because we know  women are having their children removed from them an the children are being put at more risk, as they lose  custody to an abusive father.

The data for research shows us now :that this IS an experiment for researchers or expert witnesses who rule the UK courts to give out yet more guidelines  to see how many more  children do go on to be sexually abused.This is when “knowingly the  professionals have completed research for the incidence rate of sexual abuse. This  is a  risk factor which  is  known to go up for  children,who are exposed to violence within the home. They know how to do this, simply because they have control over us , how the law says it will step in an take over, and work us families over & over again”. It is your moral duty to contact us show us your paperwork if you say this is happening to a child now.

“I see an hear so many of these DV cases that I am now becoming numb to it all”,the other side of social care & secret courts that nobody is concerned about why?

What would you do about this if you were suffering in silence you had a partner who was violent  towards you an the children ,only to find the system then  categorised  you as bad as him or give him full custody to the children and give you no contact or worst failure to protect and sent the children off to be adopted.

Moving on now.

This is now 2009 not 1959 it was un- heard of back then to even consider  having a divorce. I should know as my mother was to later get  a divorced in 1970.My friend in school confided in me  that they,  her,& her mother & brother were running away to Wales away from their father an were going under ground. This was her way of telling me goodbye in a school lesson ,  a secret to be kept, her mother was also  being knocked about, she had had enough an she was taking the children an leaving.

What a world to be bringing up children in a world of not being able to discuss the taboo . Domestic Violence kills the very  core value of all families in society if it is not handled with the sensitivity of a time bomb about to wreck a whole family unit.

What do you say to your children many years  later on when they are returned back to you  damaged, by the very same system, that said it would protect them from harm? I have heard they are dropped off on the door steps with no funding for counselling .This is after damaging the bond with the mother that they had. Your part now is to pick up the thread an the researchers will want  to study how these children cope with  very little rehabilitation just dumped on the doorstep of a carer who has been marginalized long term from their child’s life.

MP’s an the general public  alike think this is good enough care for a looked after child. How can they sell this to you this system that is said to be  working in the “BEST INTEREST’S OF THE CHILD?”

Is this the season to talk about DV how can we help mothers to get through the system without saying or doing something that will make matters worse for them?

What is the purpose of taking more risks with children?

Here is a tip for you “record your Caffcass telephone calls”.I say do this as a women called Dale Wood denied telling me this when I asked how my son was doing in foster care.They had to destroy me whole as a person so the could place my child with a father who ordinarily did not want responsibility for him.Like many men they only want the court to use as a way to harass a mother for contact. They drop it after 2 years . They get fed up of it they just want their day in court at whatever cost. If my ex put in what taxpayers have contributed to court fees he would have been said to be a genuine parent with his child’s best interests at heart.The fact was he was anything but this a non resident parent with a habit of going off to work abroad.

Transcribe all the calls just like Social Services do they write down everything that you say  in a telephone log..

The reply was ” he is very happy he does not miss you , it is you that is lonely as you have nobody at home an you are all alone. This was true she was right I was frightened ,scared all alone until I got informed I got support .And I got out of the system that had 1 sole purpose to finish me off as a parent an then rob me of my identity as a mother a parent with no real standing or place left to go labelled a child abuser in a secret court is such a public stigma so huge the weight of it would eventually crush the life right out of any innocent parent who has no legal right to justice in a secret private court.

Now tell me something I do not know . There is nothing that shocks me , I will say this show me the paperwork using the Clayton ruling as I want to time wasters.Royal courts of Injustice


Oct 09 2009

The Mother is a Liar NO DV issues !!!!!

London, 9 November 2001
Report by Paula JacksonThe problem of contact with an absent violent parent – usually the father – was the theme behind this conference attended by over 260 people and a powerful array of speakers.  Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss, president of the Family Division of the High Court and a Patron of Children Law UK, reiterated the point that the welfare of the child is the overriding consideration.   “It’s the child who matters, no one else.”  She went on to discuss the difficulties of contact when a number of different considerations have to be taken into account – the extent of the violence, the effect on the primary carer after the parting, the effect on the child and also the offender’s ability to recognise what they have done and whether they has the willingness to change their behaviour.

Audrey Mullender, professor of Social Work at the University of Warwick, told the conference that one in ten mothers said their children had been present when mothers were raped and that, from a survey of 127 refuges, only two thought children were better off from having contact.  Consultant child psychiatrist, Dr Claire Sturge, pointed out that the separation of parents increases the risk of violence and that contact can increase this risk afterwards.  ‘Do we judge the moral issue” she asked, “if we give contact to someone who has been dreadful to the child or the child’s mother?  And, apparently over 60% of fathers disappear from their children’s lives within two years.

In order to cope with the problem of contact, the use of Contact Centres where the contact is supervised, was seen as extremely valuable.  The Conference was also told of the Safe Contact Project, a multi-agency response to child contact and domestic violence.
The Rt Hon Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss, Patron Children Law UK and Conference Chair Cherie Booth QC
Given that, apparently one quarter of all violent crime is domestic and that 90% of its victims are women, it seems obvious that far more needs to be done by the cooperation of different agencies in coping with this horrendous problem.  Children Law UK is certainly the first and most probably the only interdisciplinary organisation devoted to the welfare of children in relation to the law.

Paula Jackson
Children Law UK Member

Valid CSS! Valid XHTML 1.0!
Download Adobe Reader by clicking on this link

Privacy 5This week only I am focusing on the domestic  violence issues and how the courts deal with the subject.  It is like this the courts take it that the mother is a liar  if you say  you have domestic violence issues.If you make an awful witness simply because you have had no  professional help  or input or help with counselling then you can not open up in 42 weeks of court assessments.

We also  know of some women  who have been told for their own sanity, do not go back to replay the series of events  leading up to DV .

If you also got told you have no choice you have to under extreme pressure to get your children home do this, if you  really have taken part in therapy or are forced to talk about these issues you are not feeling ready to discuss. Then this also is a breach of your human rights.

This is not what therapy or counselling it is about , finding blame ,finding of facts which can an will be used against you in closed court.The fact finding and the threshold argument is found here ,you will also find it is focused upon you only that in most cases it is you who are   are to blame. Please do not admit to anything at this stage it will take  2 years minimum in forced  CBT therapy .

It will not get you your children back. I have seen women play along and the system batters them so much it destroys them. They are clever at this an you now look exactly how they want you to look for example.

What are these safety factors which need to be put in place for child protection?

How come some mothers who can protect are punished for protecting their children.

What message is this giving children?

They gave me to a parent who abused us as a family.

What is this child, or individual worth, or classed as now that the courts have re-classified child abuse when using emotional harm .

The issue of safety and how the law in steps in to deal with the impact that DV has concerning child protection issues  is  rather daunting for a naive parent ,later on only far too late to help the parent they find out just how sinister and draconian these courts really are when it comes down to removing your child. Whether the issues of  DV= domestic violence is  presents in either  private or public law cases the same outcome is ruled .

The Children Act 1989 is used to remove children whatever the case maybe .the mother can not win she is labelled a liar.

What has happened since 1999 -2001 When expert Witnesses Dr Claire Sturge & Dany Glaser have written papers for the court based on guidelines to be considered for contact in Domestic Violence matters?

Us  happened Mothers for Justice Forum happened so many women saying help me nobody is listening.

Caffcass who is the voice of the child not listening to the child.

The child is branded a liar too .

Why are so many cases of women losing contact long term to children as they are handed over to fathers or to care or adoption .

Globally  there is outrage as women are coming together to discuss being wiped out generations of  their children’s lives.Some of these children will have   no long term idea of who their real birth mother is.

http://www.kidsindistress.org.au/familicide.php

We might have a big gap across the pond ,but the information is the same . This scandal of child deaths is on the move. What started off in secret courts is now very much a hot debate on social networking sites for children & mothers alike globally we support each other in this nightmare of war on family life.


Oct 08 2009

Forget All About Your Rights.

Tag: Uncategorizedadmin @ 5:21 am

For those of you who made very bad witnesses for the Family courts concerning domestic violence  and lost your children to abusive men .You can forget all the posters you see on public transport “your Right To Be Safe” Domestic Violence  if you have been affected ring this number…….

What advice or what would you have to say to other women who are coming through the system  dealing  with same problems?I have been watching the Criminal Justice series on every night this week. It sent me cold watching the baby being parted from the mother in prison. The face of the lady judge these are the worst judges you could ever want to meet .It takes a certain kind of judge to do family court.

The kind that hates women & children alike.There is no right to be safe !

Contact issues


Oct 04 2009

Expert says”Never Seen A Parent So Genuine”

watch?v=EjlxCSisRS4&feature=channel
The expert witness Dr Claire Sturge said in her evidence she never had seen such a” genuine parent” There are 2 other people on this holiday myself and my oldest son .The parent in this photograph has a memory problem he should have stayed at home  as he genuinely forgot his future wife his then girlfriend. The judge at the final hearing ,when reading the judgement mentioned this factor as 1 of the reasons for the start of the problems with contact. The last thing that this man has ever had is contact problems with anyone. Where we live people would laugh at Claire Sturge’s evaluation of what is geninue. This is not a magistrates court there is no expert in domestic violence you just have to look a certain kind of way or act or manipulate the system. They do say this: domestic violence victims “of the genuine kind” make very bad witnesses for court .

I was no different in so much that I lost my case to a violent man . This is the best option for the child all the time in closed family courts. So if you are thinking of saying DV I would not do so . Thinking of picking up a phone to call the police ,then think again as they use this evidence against you later on down the line years later when they have nothing else to get you on they will get you on previous domestic related incidents.

The truth of how much it will cost you will be the fact that whoever you are you will be treated the same as all the rest . The 1 shoe theory  fits all in closed courts. Now we dare you just say you are a victim of DV try the shoe on for size.


Next Page »