Lynda Mac

I have had time to reflect feeling like garbage these last few days with flu like symptoms. Wondering if I should go and turn up in someone con person’s /expert witness for courts private  counselling  session .I got asked to do this for 2 years so I could have a return of my child in a public law case.This was  in Windsor  somewhwere with some creep who muttered to himself all the way through the court case to himself mostly whilst getting very  frustrated,having to  wait so long to give his oral evidence.

Like many families they are then taken to the cleaners by being told to pay yet again ,take part in some abnormal illness session or psycho- babble to you  or if you have been labelled a mucheasun mummy along with 30,000 other poor sods who have lost their cases .Maybe it is time to play the game , even  hoodwink an old expert  witness that I am  now after 5 years of saying NO 2 parting of my own money will now go in to voluntary take  part  in CBT therapy. Think they are right  revenge certainly  is a dish best served cold. Could this Swine flu really  be the killer they say it really is ? I wonder who will take the most precautions the £100 an hour joker or the client .Cold symptoms or  the swine flu virus  I am willing if you are Dr Wilkins or Dr Sturge take your pick any day of the week suits me . I have my £250  consultation fee wrapped up in £50 notes next to my snotty used paper hankies  so I am ready when you.

Another tempting thought is this  when you think about it just block the front of house at your local closed  family court , or social services office  or Caffcass office. Get your own back on the system .All very tongue in cheek of course ,no- one is going to take me serious or carry out this very  feel good factor advice are they .lol lol

The LSC will use their discretion if there it is out of time for putting in complaints.

Let’s start the ball rolling for benefit fraud.The forms are clear to understand when you put in a claim for legal aid.

I have clear evidence I have gathered from the CSA , it is clear the father was not working from – to .

The position is not clear to me what part the solicitor plays by  then typing up statements for court . This is the risk you take when you go in closed court . Not only can you not trust your lying ex-partner you are then left to cope with firms of solicitors who simply go with the flow.

When the case goes to criminal based on the evidence of benefit fraud and working & claiming whatever the position is I will then find out if a legal aid certificate was used for this case.If this is the case then I will have to get the transcripts from criminal court to then put in a complaint about my ex-partners solicitors to the LSC . The words for misconduct of the solicitor will be ” that they knowingly took part in providing evidence which was put before the court ”

So here are letters headed  for Austin & Carnley Solicitors  Leighton Buzzard it now seems to look odd why so many different firms of solicitors ,why did   my ex-partner have to go outside the area and also why was it necessary for him  change the solicitors ,just like he  he did his story?

Moving on now  the other mentioned solicitors were Borneo Linnells  of Bedford  Patrick Perusko that should read shyster lawyer for the child ,  who is note now a judge in Milton Keynes.

The solicitor for the father was Miss Abbas has since left the firm.

The practise manager  Mr Henderson was laughing when he heard me ,could not help but chuckle , when I said I would put in a complaint pending criminal proceedings of benefit fraud.Sometimes people laugh when they are nervous or scared  lol lol . Well he was not laughing when I said I recorded his call and this would go up on the internet .

I have read all the comments about  the paperwork: is never read, also the judge rubber stamps these cases . Well lessons have to be learned . The paperwork is OUT under the Clayton ruling of how much the secret family courts stinks! The media have asked for it read it and ok not been able to print all of it so far.

Last question is this to solicitors :why train in law for 7 years only to be a joey for a dead beat dad and carry statements which are knowingly false to court and ruin a child’s life long term?

What about the justice ?

What about a fair trial?

What about equal shared contact for parents?

What about a retrial I have done my homework sue me if I am wrong . It seems to me a lot of families can and will hang you out to dry just 1 click away for being exposed  as a shyster lawyer who will sell out a sick child for how much was it you got paid?

Now then in the early days in the run up to the 42 weeks that are ahead of a typical family who have had their children legally kidnapped you would not expect to get this section 91/14 court ordered this is only slapped on you later on. It is how it looks really you keep coming back , you want a fair trial and who could blame you for wanting a fair crack of the whip.Just maybe  you fail into this category ,you simply  want what is in the previous court order. The judge said to let you have contact. I was supposed to have a no contact order at the beginning the LA failed to get this so the next best thing was to get rid of my by hook or by crook .

The really weird thing that sticks out about this case , our case :was running on very little information know at the time !!!  The fact finding was also very frightening to see how they can make things stick that are simply “not true “or evidenced is the more appropriate word for it.

Currently I am now barred out until 2010 on returning about  contact orders,now I   feel like saying add a few more years onto this to the  Judge who wrote the order Judge  Pearce who has  since note retired, but recently came back to give an order to a solicitor from the GMC to pull the transcripts of the final hearing.

Personally I can only think they have to bar you out of court as it just looks SO  retarded . Families are more clued UP now with so much talk on the internet you can not be so naive about a secret court . Well unless you are educationally sub-normal ……

A lawyer should tell you in the early days the prospect of you winning your case,but they do not so it runs on and on until the reality is you have been done up like a kipper .

We have all worked and signed the working agreements with the local authorities in blind faith , even bent over backwards to work with,  in the early assessments in the run up for court. Then the reality kicks in this is a set up and you can not achieve to please or change there opinion of you .

Then if you ask anymore questions from MP’s or for reassurances that they will think about what you have said about the courts .Take a look at this :you can expect  a  jack ass reply from: Jack Straw ,his computer would not be able to cope .Is that right ,well maybe we should embarrass this country attempt to  bring the House  of Commons & The House of Lords down with shame of contempt they hold for us families ,we could do this  by pooling our resources and taking a class action law case out to Europe.The solicitors would not have the balls for this .

Or would they we are after all in a recession ?.

Read the Wankers Reply ! And Weep !!

Well done UkSecret Courts  . I googled to look for a video and this came up:    http://www.whatsontv.co.uk/youtube/search/UKSecret Courts

Coronation Street , Eastenders ….. and  guess WOT ELSE  ?  yes look we are here on the list too ,check out us lot the crazy gang banging on about the secret family courts  .So much for the gag order hey? Freedom of speech….

Where there is a will ,there is a way!!! lol

Well this week is about to kick off of a pod cast with Yusuf Timol as guest speaker  if you would like to raise questions or take part then contact either Yusful or myself. The English families just love to sit in chat in safe rooms , just come forward and speak out use your voice if your case has ended .If it is still live then by all means lay low, but still talk about your case using the Clayton v Clayton ruling.

If you are coming on sykpe to talk please be aware the calls will probably be recorded for the discussion to begin with will be the topic of  section 91/14 so no time wasters please we will want proof of section 91/14 court  order.

Before you ask no I was not vexatious  litigant.I went back once  to court over this incident here in the video .This was about 1 hour contact a month contact.There was no real reason for  not being allowed to hand over  presents directly to my son .Please check out the video on my Lindamac channel Children’s Prisons.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1kQXOOwNHw&feature=channel

I personally could not be bothered going back to court  after being slapped with the secetion 91/14 in 2006 I think sometimes to win an argument you have to lose if that makes any sense. I have been fully aware now for a long time that I have to give the courts  good enough reason to be able to get back into court and maybe then begin to  deal with contact issues. I have sadly chosen another path which was to take the barring order for 4 years and expose the dangers the courts are willing to take  with the matters of urgent contact  for seriously ill children.This is when certain individuals  will be  dealing with life threatening diseases such as cancer .The courts have clearly ruled me out, the courts also note were indeed very petty when dealing with contact.

I have showed the paperwork lock stock and barrel  to MKF’s & the media  which is absolutely appalling .The courts show no insight into  the welfare check list  or a child’s needs. Neither do the courts  really care about the risks they take ,as they hand over full control to the local authority, or another parent.

Even though by my own admission  I walked away from the contact ,and away from the abuse dished out by the woman in the video …..I have kept in touch albeit  via school reports, and also gone cap in hand despite the court order to contact or go near Addenbrookes  hospital ,enquiring about my sons medical  progress, using my parental rights, which some parents also get denied as a right  or simply removed  by the courts.

A true fact  for  some parents,they  do not make it this far, they give up ,or some commit suicide. I do know this the courts  do not ask you do you want to leave a genetic key for your child should they come out of remission. They neither tell you if you are a carrier of a gene linked to an chromosome abnormality ……..

Stick with it as one day your missing child may need you or your help or assistance in a critical life threatening situation.The corporate parent may be long gone  down the road ,having caused the maximum amount of disruption also  inflicted  untold emotional harm on the child/adult whilst they had access to funding for court . The real difference between a real mother or Father  is this a biological parent will wait forever for a lost child .That is a fact of life  .

Love knows no time or distance for a family  member who is you bloodline ,your future your everything.

A corporate parent is just in for the gravy train ride of earning loads of $$$ £££ in funding from government grants.

Coming back to the section 91/14 court orders.

For many families this order means the end of court also the end of contact with children long term in one way or another.

Coming back  now to the pod cast and a live discussion , Yusful wants to bring together families to fight this order to take a class action. The law liars  will not take up such a case for a group of families , Yusuf will take up your case for you so get your paperwork ready  to take part .

http://parentsfirst.webs.com/

Over the years we have all been asked to step in and help a parent as a Mc Kenzie Friend to some parent who is in dire straits . I have to say it is the luck of the draw as you do not literally know what you will be getting .It is a harsh learning curve for both parties. I do not like the people who are on the forums who know nothing trying to black list the best of the MKF’s off the boards.Some people are just a waste of space and are looking to just pass the time and other people are salt of the earth decent people who do not want even paying for their service or time. I fell behind with a law course to help others going through closed court.I have no regrets as I have seen more in 5 years than the barristers just passing out.The bottom line is be prepared come into the court ready for battle.

My advise is check the advise you are getting it is your responsibility it is your case.  Do not leave it until you are in court and find out the MKF is no better than the local authority sneek who is going to sell you out.

I have seen MKF’s have rights of audience so the reference to this link here is not correct. Some people are not unlike bar-room lawyers .I rate Dr Michael Pelling top of the league seen him in action in February .Mark Potter got drained by the end of the day .Open court was very much still closed. I can agree with the comments no complaints about Mr Shaun OConnell. I heard Catherine Mills had right of audience in a case that has no moved over to criminal matters concerning child protection issues.

http://pinktape.co.uk/2008/07/27/mckenzie-friends/#comments

Did you see channel 4 dispatches Children.

http://www.channel4.com/programmes/dispatches/episode-guide/series-31/episode-1

comment for channel 4 on the programme I am waiting for my comment to be approved .

I only part recorded this programme. I am the mother who will see the mothers and hear cases of wrongful removal of emotional harm .The use of significant emotional harm is being used day in day out in the courts like it is going out of fashion.I have recently spoken with Danya Glaser she co wrote with another expert witness Dr Clarie Sturge a paper on child protection issues about emotional harm. The experts must be mindful that what they say for the media what is going on for reports for court is leaking OUT .The only trouble is these women professionals have given a license to kill a child regarding the use of the contact law.They have recommended to the court to even make sure the mothers get no contact whilst children are indeed put at risk and daily subjected to child abuse.This IS A FACT YOU EVEN HEAR THE BARRISTERS BOASTING IN COURT DID YOU SEE SO & SO GOT CUSTODY HE WAS DONE FOR MANSLAUGHTER !!

Well I can show you the paperwork that is given to you with the following words and advice from your solicitor. Contempt of court !

Then again the real contempt is for your right to be safe from harm. This is the real contempt  the bottom line is the courts are not ACTING  IN THE CHILD’S BEST INTEREST OR ARE THINKING ABOUT THEIR RIGHT TO BE SAFE .

COMMENT WOULD YOU TRUST THIS WOMAN WITH YOUR CHILDREN’S LIVES?

Lyndamac with her son

So here you have Gillian Marks , part time recorder she works for the Family courts .I sit listening to women who say she done them for  PAS ,used SIGNIFICANT EMOTIONAL HARM ALLEGATIONS mostly in custody cases. They say these solicitors do not work for you this is true.If evidence was checked out and passports pulled to show that the fathers are actually here in the UK ,this needs to be checked when they lie in evidence about  they never get contact for months at a time.

I wonder if we can expose the amount of fraud going on with pushing for transcripts to be released for benefit cheats who work abroad boast in closed court and more important get off with it . Lessons have to be learned and all that ….

Maybe when someone gets done on a massive  scale of fraud ,taking into account of  claiming long term benefit whilst claiming to have   property out in other countries to make them look the better option to the courts .Then maybe people will wake up to the scale of child trafficking, or how easy it is for parents to manipulate the system .It is also time this draconian law has it’s  sad old ass kicked into touch! and  I recommend  that it be  brought more in line ,or is more  fitting with real crime cases using real experts or doctors . The use of geriatric expert witnesses for court who would not know a bog brush from a their back side get to trash pathology on serious matters of child abuse .

It is high time to let in the juries also  all the media in , before some mothers for justice get savvy with a key board and  start dealing with or looking at your cases of maladministration. I just e-mailed her  office and  left a message for her “told her I will get to mothers before she gets to them in court.”

Any info get on the boards now, you know it is your moral duty to warn other mothers . Get it in your position statements you are not happy being set up for PAS , you will make it a criminal matter if they take  it all the way on perjury of a witness.

Get the media in and the trail by jury ………

I was on Carespace yesterday and found this link:looks like this site needs all the help it can get ,so go check out what they are saying now .

Facebook check out these comments

http://www.communitycare.co.uk/CARESPACE/forums/facebook-and-foster-care-4596.aspxI

I wonder about these poor children as foster care is dirty money now. Some children are stolen or forcibly remove from their families.The contact is broken by social workers as they are given special training to do this. I love to hear the comments I found my son on facebook . Thank god for social networking sites. I still have presents for my son . I am will simply wait for the time  for the truth to come out about closed court.

Well this week heading for the media attention is a mother who was detained under the Terrorism Act.I spoke to her after her ordeal, only to hear she has been arrested again on harassment charges. The latest is her children have also been sent to a hospital to see mental health specialists without telling the mother why. The media have been informed and we are being updated about this case.So far we have watched these children simply go missing regardless of EPO”s Emergency Protection Orders or Court orders.

This really smacks of the film Changeling ……….

Who would believe you ?  try us and the media who are taking about a year to accept or believe the stories going around regardless of the gag orders.

Still in shock at seeing my son who I have not seen face to face since 2006 , I walked away from supervised contact like so many other parents do. I would rather have nothing than this abuse which was  subjected to us by a social worker . So I have made contact through facebook and am not sure what will happen now.

Wait and see  really.