Lynda Mac

Council could be in contempt

Court of Appeal
Published March 19, 2009
In re B (Minors) (Contact order: Enforcement)
Before Lord Justice Thorpe, Lord Justice Wall and Lord Justice Moore-Bick Judgment February 27, 2009
Where a local authority was in breach of a contact order, it was enforceable by committal for contempt of court.

The Court of Appeal so held when allowing an appeal by Luton Borough Council against the decision of Judge Nasreen Pearce, in Luton County Court on October 16 and 23, 2008, to attach to a contact order made under section 34 of the Children Act 1989 a penal notice addressed to the council stating that, if the order were not obeyed, the council would be in contempt and the officer responsible for its implementation might be imprisoned.

The order required that contact be maintained between a child, in the interim care of the local authority and living with foster parents, and her stepfather and half brother. The penal notice was attached because the child

I do have paperwork to prove all of this. The case is now closed I am allowed to talk about the case till I am blue in the face if I want too.Whilst it is live you are not allowed to talk ,the name of the child is kept anon.
You have to take on board you can not win in the private or secret courts this is why we need more transparency to prevent maladministraation of evidence.

Coming back to the experience of social work : It was very strange methodology indeed. I have not read this in the databases which is being discussed by many parents on the internet . There is no comparison at all. There are children going missing and the case files going missing. The Caffcass officer do , have a habit of returning ,even after their retirement. This is to supervise contact.I suppose they have to manage their own dirty files themselves.
Women mostly talk to me about about this issue a lot they show me their paperwork under the MacKenzie Freind , these mothers are locked in to supervision contact long term with what could only be described as working with : obsessional,also very weird people who work within social services. Some of these legal guardians or social workers are very much retired, but very much still, hands on .So the mothers can not ever stand a chance of winning any decent contact with their children.
Most mothers that I meet either get no contact or maybe 3 hours a year , or 1 hour a month . I left my contact decided it was causing more harm than good. Plus did I really want to have to view the likes of the above faces long term? The answer is NO THANKS this is abnormal to have to have a relationship with …… just to get to see your own child.
Julie Tadd, also made a very predictable attempt ,in an effort to get me to return to contact in 2005 post final hearing, after Dr Claire Sturge et al recommended no contact for the mother for 3 months to the local authority.
You would go crazy if,in fact you stayed and “tried “being the operative word, to work with them. So I decided I would walk away.Sometimes to win an argument ,you have to agree with people even if the are in the wrong. And lose your case.

This was when in March 2005 they fast tracked him to his father without proper parenting assessments, after the local authority stopped my contact for 3 months so he could settle in I walked for 9 months then they started to contact me about coming back to see my son .Social worker Julie Tadd later went on to write in a report ; I read my son was not responding to treatment in August 2005 ,my son is in remission,he has been from the first lot of treatment. So why did she write he is not responding to treatment ?. Addenbrookes hospital Quoted in a fax sent to her : unless she corrected her facts , they would no longer work with her either.
I took advice from a counsellor who worked with families dealing with leukaemia, she confirmed after seeing the care folder and the drugs the child was on ,that the social worker was lying as he was not in hospital. If she was telling the truth he would be on a ward, this was not the case.

She had also co- worker, a family aid, Sharon Andrews who said “my son never asked to see me”.This was also a LIE my son who was very ill at times was always asking to see me, it was very upsetting to read this and I do not know how I managed to survive, but survive I did and I am not about to shut up for Jack Straw or anyone else.
Again I have documents which under the :Clayton ruling have been shown to various professionals who are very much interested in what is going on in “THE GULAG OF THE FAMILY COURTS”, Jack Frost et al. I have been working with many over the years. Exposing experts in both private and public cases concerning DV and emotional harm cases without us they would not know of how the social services or courts conduct their work with families.
There is also a big swing to with mothers losing custody cases. Where is the data? well Jack Straw is in the dark, pretty much like everyone else. The evidence is on the internet on the forums and the growing support for parents groups which are setting up globally passing information very fast to others.

As you can go to prison for disclosure of the paperwork without the use of the Clayton ruling , you will have to take what I tell you with blind faith .Why would I lie ? I have lost and I am merely telling you the truth the system is flawed .This is the reality of social work today with individuals some of them who have no qualifications entering into the filed of social work.

Support the campaign and stop Jack Straw reversing the Clayton ruling , or from covering up for these so called professionals who should be held accountable in public Inquiries.

http://www.parentcentral.ca/parent/article/602350

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/celebritynews/5004245/Jade-Goody-husband-Jack-Tweed-propped-her-up-to-watch-final-sunset.html

I checked the updates for Jade Goody , she is asking for a drink of coke and to be propped up to see the sunset at her home .

Poor Jade my heart goes out to her & her family .

I wonder what the general public would have to say if they found out just how easily children are removed by doctors on an EPO on trumped up charges of child abuse or neglect in NHS wards in hospitals throughout the world.

I then wonder how they would cope if it happened to their families: finding out your child has leukaemia and then losing their child long term,when they are forced to live somewhere else.

We just have so much blind faith in our legal system and a belief that social services are doing a good job: all in the child’s best interest. Yet so much is done in secrecy .

If the professionals were ever to be put in a room with me now, I wonder how these social workers or solicitor’s would fair. It is no secret now,that I can not stand the sight of any of them and lost all my respect for their profession steeped in secrecy and corruption .

This is Understandable really when you think of the collateral damage and untold harm they have inflicted upon our family ,not to mention the SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF MONEY THEY HAVE ALL EARNED.

I wonder what my younger son would have to say about how : they could only manage 2 days a year for a cancer victim to have contact . What a waste of his young life .

What utter contempt was had for a young person :a human being with a legal personality. These so called legal professionals are going to be held accountable for their part they played throughout the court case.

When you think about this, all it amounts to is 2 days out of a year = 1 hour a month and no hand over of presents allowed to the child.

Moving on now

I will post the fob off letters from OFSTED which looks like they are not going to inspection on their pilot scheme , these Children’s Private Contact Centre’s in Luton .

I have no regrets at all from walking away from these Children’s Prisons , I have tried to bring attention to the state of them also highlight the health & safety of them they are not simply not interested .

Wonder What the MP’s will have to say about it is it the end?

I doubt it not if I have anything to do with it .

I rang my friend up today just for a chat , she told me that they had seen my son recently whilst they were out shopping .I love to hear any news about him as I no longer go to a contact centre for 1 hour a month.

Our children went to junior school played together since they were 5 years old .This is where, we first met each other at the school gate . She is a lovely lady ,We would go out to eat or have turns around whose house to go to play or have coffee.

We would often go to the gym or out shopping: whilst the children were at school.We would jump in her car and then we would go for breakfast in the morning to Littlewoods for a big fry up or early lunch.

We spent a lot of time together going different places parks , swimming , bicycle rides it worked out fine as we were all very active and not stay at home mothers .

My son even stayed overnight in her home, even got invited to the same birthday parties.

In fact her children were sitting in her car which was parked up behind the ambulance. I asked her to help me, by coming into town to taking home my suitcase, rather than leave it overnight in the walk in centre .I was in the NHS walk in centre when they called an ambulance. This was within minutes when they called the ambulance to take him to the L & D hospital. We landed at Luton after a holiday in Gran Canaria a few minutes before.

I wonder now : what they made of it when my son said to her son “who are you ” as they said hello to him ?

Up until C got placed with his father & wife in 2005 ,we had reasonable contact when he was in foster care post placement, this all changed when they handed him to his father .

Her son was very good friends with my son ,they came to visit him in hospital .In fact they came up regular Addenbrookes hospital.C was clearly over the moon to see them arrive. I have it on video them playing together .They were vital in helping him , to recover from treatment which was very depressing for him .These children lifted up his spirits, just when he needed some kind of normality, after the major disruption of EPO and care orders.

I am forever in their gratitude, and to the many other families who reached out to us as a family going through the social service nightmare and supported us.

So to say I am shocked now is an understatement.

When you speak to social workers, or teachers they report a happy child in school.

I find this truly amazing that as a child , you can so easily forget best friends.

The social services and the court order,stopped everyone from seeing him or telling C the truth .

After hearing this now , I wonder if my son knows what day of the week it is.

He had to ask who is best friend was. My friend asked him if he remembers her daughters? he said no. He had gone in the CO-OP and asked my friend did she remember him.She said yes , he is taller ,but still looks the same.

Then what can you expect, a child who has been through so much is going to be confused about what is real, and what is not real !

Let’s face it he is the victim of perjury in closed court , he is not alone ,he is just 1 of thousands of children living the social services lie.

I suppose “People Are asking Jack why the reversal of Clayton ruling?” I suppose I can wait a month for a reply from Jack Straw to my letter . I mean I have waited almost 5 years now being messed around by closed courts and professionals. People are asking me now what the posters are up in the front of the house.I said come over and have a look ,it is about a reversal of the Clayton ruling.
I used this ruling to find legal advise after the legal system attacked me in secrecy .Back then in 2005 as a: pack of professionals gathered to make money out of the public eye. It would be very interesting what they would have to say now as the media have read their reports and their charges for writing the reports.
This reversal will no doubt have serious consequences for both the media, and the families. In our case nothing was ever evidenced ,or witness came in person to court just statements sent in , a mere witch hunt: of another naive mother going in to be done for emotional harm, with neglect thrown in for good measure at the 11th hour. This is nothing like criminal court I just wish it was ,as you would get a fair trial. This is nothing but a KANGEROO COURT.
Moving on:
I have just been sent a form to be completed from Clic Sargent Caring for children with cancer. I have spoken to a manager today and pointed her in the right direction of You Tube.

Experience has told us “children have no real advocacy or an equal opportunity of being heard whilst the likes of Caffcass and social workers pen bogus reports for court and for the general public attention.

At some stage it would be best to come back to those diaries of 2005 concerning lack of contact and thousands of pounds of my own money being spent out on a working relationship that has one goal,which is to blame and fail me as a parent.
Is it any wonder so many families are gathering in protest at this news of more secrecy to be addressed by the removal of the Clayton ruling.

I look forward to media coverage how I am more than willing to go to prison to keep the Clayton ruling in a final attempt to bring in justice,or a jury in,in the form of the media to families.
I have nothing to gain and nothing to lose any more .
The only losers will be your families in the future ,we want transparency and most important accountability of so called money grabbing professionals committing perjury.