I looked in to see Judge Mac Gregor in the Family Court in First Avenue House on Thursday 29th January 2009 ,whilst I was up town arranging to meet with another mother,who is in a similar situation regarding not being able to see her children.
I had asked to speak to her clerk of the court for the day . Judge Mac Gregor , had told her clerk, to let me know she had a spare 5- 10 minutes , a lovely young lady asked me politely, write down my name ,and what it is that you want to see the judge about.
This judge obviously knew who I was, after all this time she had not forgotten the last shaking, I gave them on my last day in court.
I simply wrote down Linda McDermott Children’s Rights Campaigner, I am going to bench mark a case for child C to find a genetic key.
The clerk returned with a firm NO the answer was no . I do not think, even if I put in an application on specific issues on a C2 form ,the answer would be any different .I hope this is enough to have by now exhausted all the domestic remedies in the Family Closed Court and head out to europe. I have section 91/14 , just wished it was section 54 no right of appeal out you go …….. and do not come back.
Shame really ;as it was Judge Mac Gregor , who gave me an order in the first place stating :I could have nothing to do with hospitals, or my sons treatment in 2005. In my life time I would never be able to look after my son , after it was transparent not to me back then when it happened ,it is very clear now a witch hunt took place, with bogus experts for court.
Basically a case, was put together very fast indeed with very limited information.
It was so fast,that it spiraled dramatically out of control, of everyone, who was connected with the family, or trying to work with the case.
The facts, take note, in open court in front of media, would not have stood up.
Judge Pearce district judge, in the lower court Luton , was equally difficult, also she was of no real help, either.Judge Pearce dismissed a letter, from the consultant who first took out the EPO in May 2004.This letter said ” he now he does not agree with ruling me OUT of hospital appointments.”
Think about this for a moment it was not disclosed for the final hearing by anyone in February 2005 at an 8 day trial why could this be?
The consequences do not bear thinking about for any sick child in the future, if these dirty tactics are being carried out in private , secret call it what ever you want.
Maybe this consultant , has not had time to take all of the contacts, or a full history for a genetic link.
Ironic isn’t it, when you think Addenbrookes hospital : is the centre of research in Cambridge .
Well, whilst they were all,found guilty of being rather excited ,for trapping yet :another mother for an msbp witch hunt gathering . The professionals can not be said to be expected to, get everything right can they ? .
I wonder why the experts could not predict my next move , the mother would not take part in any dangerous legal games in a secret court .
The point I am making is as serious, as it gets really. When you think about it , it is all about taking risks, not sparing the child ,or protecting the child from risk .It literally is about getting away with as much risk, as you damn well please with a looked after child in private .
For this risk , someone will have to be made accountable .Who will the finger of blame fall too. I mean the multi-agency will have to pay the price, for making fatal mistakes. They were so complacent ,in using the same template,which they have used on many gullible parents over the years with these so called experts.
So far with the grace of god, and no help,whatsoever from courts or judges ,my son is in remission from a life threatening disease ,that will kill you if it is not managed appropriately. He has remained in remission from the outset of the start of maintenance treatment which was for 3 years.
A public inquiry will be on the cards, and professionals who all took part shall be named for their negligence, in a collective decision, to cover up ,a dereliction of duty of care in another case for child C in the future. I might not be able to show my paperwork, but now the case is closed and ID of the child is kept anon I can write about this case.
Coming back to Judge Mac Gregor now.
This judge was relatively new to the bench back then in 2005 so I hope leniency will be given by the media however, I doubt this , common sense should be in place,however there is none .You will find a Common Purpose interests there is standing room only in these courts with so many people making money out of children’s misery. Her Honor Judge Mac Gregor probably had no insight, into significant risks concerning a right to life, or concentrated on the actual contract set out for the local authority for contact for child C.
Child C should in theory should be able ,to fast track a blood relative should he come out of remission.
Coming back to the judge, I have got literally sick of coming into the UK secret Courts .I think I will take your order to ECHR’s , let them see how seriously ill children are protected for futuristic emotional harm which is something else which is being liberally used as an excuse, to get a parent out of a child’s life long term.When serious issues as being able to get in touch with a biological parent for a bone marrow sample of a stem cell donor in the future is not open for debate then more pressure will have to be put on courts and judges to drag them into the 21st century.
Why ? simply because they have not prepare for such a controversial debate for the children or considered this really would be in “The Child’s Best Interest” . The luxury and pleasure of these arrogant ,tight arsed or uppity women , lording it about in high court ,or lower court when , sitting as judges or working as solicitors, or jumped up barristers working for the local authority , could never be seen to be discussing such important or sensitive issues, for children.
These children just for the record by the way who have been wrongly removed in the first place .
Then secondly ,how are they going to justify the order in the first place . The dubious way arbitrary fact finding is supplied ,or contributed to the court is nothing: but junk science; psycho babble which has never been proved either in closed court or in universities. This is not opinion but a fact .
This has to be the biggest insult to human life, and you are not ready to talk yet ? Let me know when you will be ready. It seems the courts are willing to leave closed adoption, closed with no human rights for adopted children to find a genetic key .
I will find a way of helping people to appreciate, the true complexities of trouble created, for want of a better word by the courts, in the family division.
The amount of corruption of so called professionals, dragging out their legal arguments ,that basically are not proven or evidenced.
The fact remains now as children are lost in the care system ,will need now, more than ever, if they are to have an equal chance to find a true genetic key.
Not a bogus report by some barm pot expert witness for court nobody is interested in these reports they are useless they belong in the trash can.
The incentive to form such global networking came from many families who will continue to suffering injustice, or miscarriage of a justice in the family division.
This was from my own a personal nightmare of finding out my son had cancer,and our lives being ruined by a doctor and perjury for court case. They all knew I stood no chance of a fair trial simply because they knew of many families who were done long before I arrived . Then I listened carefully to the families who said: they lost contact to children adopted .
My son has gone to live with a biological parent and extended family , he may well of been adopted by them I do not know.
We all say the same . Time to inspect your files & judgement’s with a fine tooth come And that goes for all the professionals ,taking part in secret, or like your honor judge Plumstead says “private” not secret courts”. Oh yes Right you are !
If respectability is allowed for the likes of Mary Archer wife, of Lord Archer who has been done for perjury ,made lots money from writing about his experience .The the same respect can be given to families who are innocent of allegations made in a secret court. Which ever way you look at it .This can,and will be seen as a final insult children & families on her visits on wards in Addenbrookes hospital.
Imagine a child having a memory of my mum was taken away and I was not allowed to see her when I most needed to see her,however ,it was good enough to be associating with criminals, who had status and money, to air brush their way out of a life of crime.
The families must be allowed a chance to write a book ,also to survive to tell of their experience not be threatened with prison for contempt. I am past caring now, contempt or not, it has not harmed, Lord Archer, and he helps to write laws that govern us everyday . Or destroy our children’s future ,you decided.
Then we too ,can gain back our respectability 1 day if we have a fair trial ,just maybe find some kind of resolution , from being labelled in closed court as child abusers. And have our children returned home.
I do not think Mrs Mary Archer should have some chance meeting with my son or any other familiy who were subjected to this carry on . Simply because she is on the trust committee or some Chair in Addenbrookes.
When ruling out a family , when some of my own family members , have recently died , after a long battle with cancer , and some thing as big as this , not been allowed to see Child C whom they have know all his life , not allowed to say their good byes .
I hope Mary you can answer me, what is it your family have, that we do not have, in terms of rights?
There is no justification, to this being done in the name of child protection .
When on the other hand it is fine in a working capacity, to know that, some lord or others spouse, has got the right more rights to breeze in, on a children’s ward like some Celeb, even if her husband is an ex con and she can come into contact with your family.
