Mar 23 2010

Looks Innocent Enough!

The video recording is going up soon of Cafcass buckling under duress of a request for information using the DPA . The previous posts state that they have destroyed the file. They have now asked head office to sort this out.

I appreciate it must be difficult for them now they have gone to the effort of lying about this matter and will need all hands on deck  from head office to sort this mess out.

Moving on to solicitors looking for that certain expert for court If I  remember correctly they took ages to get a 3rd expert in after the final hearing to rule out the 2 doctors  or so called expert witnesses for court ,these experts are currently  are under investigation with the GMC  Dr Wilkins already has 1 warning from the GMC check out the GMC website .

The Local Authority who were sharing costs for these reports they ruled out  the CV for  Mr Anderson  psychologist . This was the first psychologist and he was rejected for the reasons of not being qualified enough I have sent both CV’s to the GMC & HPC to compare them.

Then again he probably was not a trauma expert with a conflict of interest unlike Linda Jeffes. Please check the link to finding experts to the right hand side of the blog.

Read this: “I trust you will not need Graham Flatman’s CV”  all looks rather innocent until you think about it this is a fishing trip for certain experts who will fall in with what the other 2 experts say. Graham does not like to give out his working address,I found comments in the paperwork. This said, he does not think for 1 moment a client could use a computer and find the details he posts online  to get himself work.

I am going to post his estimate costs when I get time to delete the child’s name out . Think it was over £5,000 for an out of date MMP1 test and an inconclusive report which was incomprehensible report at that .


Mar 16 2010

Boxing Off The Bogus Experts!

Have you ever wondered why a police forensic psychiatrist will never say it is stomatoise disorder , when the child psychiatrist will dive straight in ? What is it about a child psychiatrist that they  feel, they are qualified to  step outside their field of expertise and cross over to medical?

Who is really policing the expert witnesses for court ?

Why do the solicitors not help with the complaints about these doctors when you are left getting past a panel on the GMC?

Why do the  doctors who know something is wrong with the evidence stay quiet and let this pack run on for years ,just like the Sally Clark case and many more cases of mothers who have been set up in a kangeroo court.

These are the sort of problems that most parents encounter when they await the reports for court from so called expert witnesses.

The only parents that really escape the psychiatric abuse and get off easy are the other parent who will not get sent to see a psychologist the last expert who will just agree with the other 2 experts.

Did you know that  certain solicitors make sure fathers never sit the MMP1-2 test for court in custody cases? The stress factor alone makes them score really high .

Graham Flatman the expert they  got for me, done the out of date version of this  test which was  designed  over 30 years ago. Basically if you answer yes or no it is a score ,so you are admitting to a problem that you do not have !

Even though lifestyles have changed a lot since then,the questions are not relevant to lifestyles today .  Finally the end result  I scored very high on all levels simply because I was bright.

I was not that bright ,the expert Graham Flatman got paid over £5,000 to do an inconclusive report for court.

I have workmen coming in soon to do my kitchen if any of these workmen were to not complete the job by the end of the week they  would not get paid. Taxpayers paid for a report for court that ended up being the worst out of all 3 of them . I want to warn other parents  to think logically about  this   part of investigations as this has to be  the worst part for court ,sitting being abused for a lot of money .

Why make matters worst than they already are ?

It is high time parents got clued up about the paperwork being generated by bogus experts operating from a PO BOX number and put an stop to it ?

Cut them out right out and tell the social services thanks for babysitting until they child finds out the truth then they can sue them for a wrongful removal  …….

There is no right to a fair  trial in a Kangeroo Court.


Feb 03 2010

Saying Goodbye Dr Claire Sturge At It Again.

Detained in Addenbrookes hospital 2004

It chilled me to the core to read the statistics on here yesterday to find these words ” to say good bye”….. and next to this her name Dr Claire Sturge, that is what somebody typed into google yesterday by doing a search they found my blog.


This blog is about us as a family , our living nightmare ,our experience of surviving closed family court and the final hearing ,it continues 5 years on with surviving being torn apart by social services and solicitors only in it to binning the case from the start ,not to mention coining in taxpayers money for court cases.
Ordinary families can not prepare themselves for this experience,an if the solicitors are honest which they are not they do not have any realistic chance of winning inside what we know as a Kangeroo court.

Who ever has done the search yesterday I dread to think how they are feeling right now I understand what will happen to your family next. I too have had enough of saying goodbye to my son in supervised contact to last a life time.In our case it just heightens what we are saying is wrong with the system that is controlled by Local Authorities and courts.
What the judge said was she could not comprehend how any mother could not want to see her child in a supervised contact setting.Maybe the judge should go into the world of supervised contact do it anon or under cover and use her imagination or have a heart an feel the full force of legal child abuse handed out by social workers in private contact centres then and only then will she understand what is wrong.

What made it really worst for us was my son survived leukeamia and 3 years treatment only to be wasting valuable time off his young life spent wasted in courts, meetings and finally in some run down property run by an ex-social worker who gets £45 an hour to write lies about me in particular for court.

These contact centres are nothing but holding cells to break parents down & children down and are harming children. The strange thing is there is no research done on this is there?

It also pains me to think that nearly 5 years on there are other children & mothers this is still happening to and there is nothing we can do about it realistically to warn families about the closed court experience.

Ideally I would like to connect a few of the media journalists who are writing these stories about mostly women who are losing custody,or who have very little contact or contact has been made so miserable by social services that they walked away from it.

We families are talking about everything and sharing a lot more besides talk.I am going to do a video with parents talking about their individual or personal experience what it was like it could help some people to join all the dots up by taking part in doing research ,or linking up and finding out more each day,which can only help you to understand the system. So this could also be of use to you to .

For a start ,we are wondering just how many of these cases there are, of children gone missing against their expressed wishes ,we have read not just recently in the papers, but over a long period of time the cases of children being forced to go live with fathers.
These same names are coming up time and time again Dr Claire Sturge & Danya Glaser are in connection to so many children going missing and mothers getting no contact with there mother? They bring Dr Sturge in on the final hearing when they want to finish off the mother who is clever an picks up something is wrong with the legal guardian not listening to the child.

Is this some kind of Nazi experiment in trauma ?
What is going on ?
You will have to accept sometimes, children do have issues about not wanting to see their fathers, and it can not all be simply because of PAS or implacable hostility there are valid reasons for not going to see somebody,what if they are being abused or mistreated.

As I am getting more women who are contacting me about Dr Sturge yes this is the same expert in our case I have to ask this next question :”Why are we seeing so many more cases in the media concerning a perverse reversal of custody of children?” is she directly involved or responsible for these cases , is it possible to pull the information from somewhere using the Data of Protection Act?

The GMC case handler that I have, said to me ,please encourage any more people to put in their complaints in writing as another mother had previously rang up and spoke to him and said she wanted to put in complaints but dare not put in complaints as she was threatened with a reversal of custody she had spoken to him first then after speaking to me about my experience with being sliced up in a meeting with Dr Sturge in 2004 at her Gayton Road Family Clinic she went on to use NLP tactics to pull information from me,by doing this Dr Sturge was able to conclude it was implacable hostility and missed obvious important facts out which are relevant to the case .Is this only an agenda with Dr Sturge does she see PAS everywhere or is she just against mothers having a good loving bond with their children?
Why is she promoting the welfare of children to be raised with a parent who is violent or has abused a child in their past.


Jan 28 2010

Do Not Be Taken In By A 2 Faced Judge !

What can you expect from the Family Courts.Well If first hand experience is anything to go by and after meeting so many mothers who have had this perverse reversal done to their children it is like this.

Fact Finding evidence in domestic violence cases.

If you have calls logged at the police station for damage to your property or house, how does the Scots Schedule decide this? I do not believe they considered the damage to my front door kicked in or calls to the police. That has to be bullshit too damage to property costs for repairs…..

2) Child sex abuse how do the courts decide on the training of  these SO experts who checks the experts? Have you seen how many children in America are now suing for damages in these perverse reversal of custody cases?

Your rights removed in closed court

I am left wondering now  how soon it will be when the UK mothers will be quick on the uptake to follow the lead of US mothers in claims for damages . Imagine the cost to the NHS in families taking  out claims on behalf of children,who are finally  sent back home once ,they are seriously damaged children, because lets face it , that is what is happening .

These children are reported to be only  returned when harm is done to them.It seems to me, and also  other professionals, this is an  experiment in trauma ,what else can this be about ?It is staring you in the face ,they only want these children for something , as it is not in any child’s interest to be removed from a good parent in favour of placing with an abusive parent but this is what is taking place.

If  this is not  more about a conflict of interest, and experts either needing subjects to train on, or make money from them staying involved  long term then I will eat my hat .

So much for conflict of interest , take a look at this: Dr Claire Sturge  sent this fax to the child’s solicitor who is now a judge in Milton Keynes. This is:” INTENT TO LABEL ANOTHER FISHING TRIP!” my medical notes have not gone over and she is AT IT !
For those of you  who were sent to the following Family clinics to see Joan Claire Sturge she is  in Gayton Road Harrow Middlesex or ,or to Edward House Lisson Grove   London to see  police forensic psychiatrist  Dr Anthony  Wilkins ( he rents private rooms by the hour)I have to say now ,it was very intimidating  experience in having a meeting with him .I also heard  from other  mothers  they too felt intimidated ,and  having experienced this first hand Dr Wilkins hates women you can tell the way he looks at you ,the words “implacable hostility “had to come from somewhere and this doctors will practise this in a closed court along with Dr Claire Sturge ,and just  like  the lyrics in a Barry Manilow song I write the (song that makes the world go round)these experts write and train the doctors to give evidence  in court ,they write the same guidelines for DV contact ,they write literature for , solicitors to  study emotional harm  when they are training at University the  facts are life is not like a text book 1 – 4 women died in the UK every week from DV yet we dare not say DV in closed court . The  text books and everything else  is bonus ,something else that is very profitable for everyone else who is working behind closed doors  of the court This works very well for all the experts  in court and they have to be respected they wrote the books about it .

Women say the same about Ludwig Lowenstien I have spoken to him he sounds like another money grabbing freak  on the same gravy train ,he has got his own private care homes he has worked with Claire Sturge .Lowenstien said get the legal aid money and I will change the PAS around for you !

So as far as I understand it then ,it seems a legal game for all of them it is not so funny for the children .Be well aware of what you are about to walk into , and make no mistake as you are likely to get fitted up for this psycho-babble as we were .

By now most of us mothers will have undertaken minimal searches for CV’s about the experts who destroyed our lives ,and we have read enough paperwork so we  can prove to you just how far these experts will push a tall story on behalf of 1 parent to get the other parent out of the way so that the parent that wins the court case gets only to have an exclusive relationship with the child.How creepy is that ?

Please note these professionals are  Tavistock or Coram all of these  cases happen to be in the  long term loss of children in custody battles. They also  get away with it by using  these  experts are using NLP training ,or Tavistock training. Here is an example of doctors looking for to rule out a malignancy ,at the same time the patient is busy else where being assessed for abnormal illness behaviour before even meeting the expert or the expert reading the medical notes.

Not once does any of this  look like this is child focused,as they never considered the child, or hear what the child is saying if they do they simply  twist the facts. These experts  will do anything to destroy any child even my child who was  having 3 years treatment for leukemia was not spared , 3 times in total.There were no concessions made for him he had to travel to see Claire Sturge at her clinic as she quotes I charge £150 an hour and do not travel .

It is just child’s play to them  in a sinister way I mean child’s play , the children are house with psychos , pedophiles,sound crazy ? Well wait until it happens to you then see how crazy this is , it works very well for professional’s to abuse vulnerable families in a closed court.

They will take your child break their heart, and force contact on that child without a care for the child’s wishes & feelings. What kind of message is that giving our children?

The final message to children is that they are worthless pawns in the game and moved like  a piece on a chess board. Done get out of that, I can hear the judge saying underneath his or her breath , as you repeatedly return to court and have a long lasting relationship with your bank account with a solicitor for 5 years or more ……

.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/family/7079017/Lesbian-mother-appeals-court-decision-after-daughter-removed.html

The similarities with all of these cases are of no prior concerns about  these children staying with their carers,so this is a fact, they were never at risk. The fact finding is seriously flawed with barm pot expert witnesses writing reports done using this NLP training so imagine what kind of report you will end up with for court !

My son C went to a non resident parent who  had recently married again,he was  divorced when I met him  with 3 children an ex – wife who says she was in dire need of staying in a battered wives hostel with her 3 children rather than stay in the marriage and similar experience  with DV issues .

Claire Sturge invited me to return to talk with her about contact about contact in Northwick Park hospital  I took along  Liz Oldham Machins solicitor. The only reason I took my solicitor was I never trusted Claire Sturge as she used technic of cutting you up in conversation.

This is a professional giving orders 1 day to stop contact for 3 months then worrying 9 months later why you have not come back . What do these professionals really know about families ?

Get this we families will not be hoodwinked any more .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTIw7FEg85Eg

The expert I would like you to tell the courts what went wrong with contact ,also how much your role ,the recommendations you made about how it should be done contributed to this no contact now.

Why are so many mother talking globally about losing custody or have been subjected to threat therapy private same experts recommending it ,also wanting you to pay them a lot of money for 2 years.


Nov 29 2009

Checking Out The Experts CV on Attachment & Trauma.

5Another  Children’s Rights Campaigner in Texas HopeFor Kidz said to me get off the phones as this is a complete waste of time when dealing with parents complaints about closed courts. Make them do a questionaire to see what they have done so far.I have had to drop a lot of dead weights of facebook as they just want so much doing for them.They make the sad mistake  that you are a like a social worker, or an agony aunt to lean on. I must just have that kind of face with mug written all over it. Let me tell you this I am not a  JOEY either. I am neither a social worker, or an agony aunt I am as tough as they come an have no messing from anyone .I want to see you work your case with help from my many contacts,and I want to see your paperwork using the Clayton ruling.So if you are looking for sympathy listen to this wise saying my Canadian friend told me this , you can find SYMPATHY in the dictionary it is between SHIT & SYPHILIS .So let me tell you this  feeling sorry for yourself or anyone else is not going to get you your children back . You either  have to be prepared to work for years against they system which will make it as difficult for you as possible, or the easy way out is accept defeat. The choice is all yours ,at least be honest an tell people what the score is and do not hog the helpline as someone else is trying to get through.

So from now on if you seriously mean business, an want to fight your case ,then get on to sykpe for free video conference calls.I do like the following: websites  ParentsFirst & Pain  have  a lot of help on offer,  so check out their website too .I started out on Fassit  & then there is my good friend Ian Walton  at www.stopinjustice now.com…… he is massive the hits he gets.

If nothing else sykpe conference calls  will simhttp://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6936335.eceply cut out all the parents who like to sit on facebook  who are complete lot of   time wasters ,from those other  genuine parents, who are still  traumatized and still got  a bit of fight left in them who will do the paperwork and want to work .

These parents just need a bit of  extra time ,then stage by stage they can re-build a case for their children to sue the  social services for the harm done to their children do not give up .

Let us look again at the experts, an the complaints procedure post court . I am so busy I do not have enough hours in the day to take on more cases the next couple of weeks as I am looking at the word” attachment” the key word is attachment.  I want you to check the CV of your experts an see if the “attachment & trauma “are listed first or referred to more than once throughout the CV.I know the Caffcass officer  Dale Wood & independent social worker Janet Forbes were  referring to work and support needing to be done in our case when they switched the residency after the psych reports came in.

I am going to have keep this short now,so  ask yourself this question ,if you have a good loving bond with a parent then why would anyone want to break this bond?

Why create a situation of  utter hopelessness?

And Why  invent a need for long term therapy for a parent who has achieved so much throughout a child’s formative years?

Why more important of all undo the fastenings that hold a child to a loving parent?

Surely any expert would understand the basics ,that this is going to be so harmful if  a child has already bonded not to mention  the child also has  a secure relationship with a parent,say  than that of a replacement ,or substitute of an adoptive parent who hardly knows a child at all?

The answer is ££ funding for research which is also big business. Take for instance the baby P case,do you think experts would want to study the likes of his mother & his abuser ? Ofsted have destroyed his file!

These children  would not make interesting guinea pigs for experts,even the doctor at the hospital over looked the child’s injuries so that just proves my point.They do not want to know these families , but when you look at sociable well rounded children like our children then these families  would, meet the criteria for good subjects to study. Children who are adored,are very much loved,  cared for and are happy children. These children are taken away an broken by the system that swallows them whole , then many years later sent back home as they can do no more with these broken children left on the scrap heap sent back to us parents who have been labelled as unfit they are not children any parent would have the means to deal with either . These children will be very disturbed after their experience .

The  only reason that this could be, is  for the purpose of research what else is this about? It is worst than what the Nazis done in the past to the Jews social engineering.

So here is what you do, check out, the experts list in the directory an see what they do best:  here is 1 of my experts that I am putting complaints in about.Psychologist Graham Flatman

This is his home address and phone number: he used a black penhttp://www.waterlowlegal.com/directories/mr-graham-flatman-afbpss-1707757.php an erased his address on a letter sent out to my solicitor Liz Oldham , with a specific request from her ,do not give it out to anyone who is not professional. http://www.lcs-test.co.uk/HomeNav.htm


Nov 18 2009

Kangeroo Court Time Again

For the last few days I have been a thorn in the backside of a few people an will not back down when looking for the data kept on files kept on a database about us.Many families will be peacefully getting on with their lives thinking so what .Some of you will be interested enough to take on board what is done with this information for private court cases held behind closed doors of the Family courts . This is for complaints about solicitors  http://www.legalcomplaints.org.uk/home.page

The timescale is 3 months get it in if they lose your case they have to pay you compensation for losing your case.I am 4 years out of time , and not enough hours in the day to complain about my experience dealing with solicitors.I went to pay 10p a sheet for copies of paperwork I needed. I called in to Machins in  Victoria Street Lutonan what did I find? I have certainly not had copies of  all the letters of instruction to the expert witnesses for court.I have not more important got copies of a placement meeting either ,if you read the contents of this then you will see why the earlier post of Caffcass have said they have destroyed the file. When you cross reference these 1 contradicts the wishes & feelings of the child altogether an the only 1 being heard is the same sex foster carer on  a hefty wage of £500 for a special needs child.

I have to keep this post short now as I have to get ready for court, a solicitor is putting in a request for an application for a 3rd party disclosure for transcribes from the court as the experts oral evidence is just bizare as the reports an the costs they charged for writing them. £5,598 for an inconclusive report done by a psychologist who is shy about giving out his address.So works from a POBOX number. This kind of tells me what kind of personality disorder he has, andwhat a generous personality trusting taxpayers have who are willing to pay for this kind of thing to go on in secret .Just so you know that  the psychologist has had it off with your taxpayers money for incomplete work done for court . Time to get a jury into the closed courts if not to save children from forced adoption at least in a recession save us from this debt.

5There is a list of interested parties the GMC listed  for court and guess what? There is now 1 of them who is not  happy about the bundles being put in to court an the request for complaints to be dealt with as a matter of public interest.

Do not mind me being set up, or being given the run around by  not  being given a chance to get hold of files or data for years now. I ask you how the hell are you expected to be able to raise complaints or give a concise report of my own of what I say is wrong with the experts. Note the solicitors leave you to get on with this as they will not help with this matter of complaint. So now it seems the expert is stonewalling all the way .The judge  who retained the case is not available  either .I can not see what is in the list that is the doctor is worried about and will not  agree the bundles.So lets see if another judge will hear it.It is listed for today 30 mins an am not sure if it will be dismissed all because the man from  Lisson Grove says NO !!!.


Oct 19 2009

My son is 1 out of 4 cases reported a chest infection.

Not asking much.I have just been sent a reminder to take part in a radio show tonight.”When Truth is Ignored in Favour of Blame” is anyone else from the forums going on tonight .Please be aware we are 5 hours ahead.I find it hard to post about the experience of finding out that your child has leukeamia as if I am honest like most people do on Christmas morning they  turned off from the subject of   sick children in hospital, that is unless it is your children then you will have an interest…

I want to appeal to the foster carers an adoptive parents ask them how impressed they will be to find out what we already know about this system that says it cares about children. Moving on now .

I get asked what did you do to get in this mess? The first person to ask this question was from my 7 year old son? C said if it was not for me getting cancer you would not have got in trouble now, this is more like  the truth .On the one hand you will have a doctor create blame then observe the other doctor say or do nothing when they know full well what is right an what is morally wrong with causing harm to a child by putting them into care when they willingly know that the way forward is to blame an innocent parent. “These Doctors Who Remove Your Children”!

In 2004 we were about to set off on a 14 day holiday in the Canary Islands , on and off my son was complaining of back ache the school rang me  to collect him.The next thing was, I took him to see the nurse as an emergency appointment at short notice. Looking at the court bundles the paperwork looks doctored or flows like head teachers an the other parent fell out of law school as the statements are churned out fast an thick.As I went through the step by step process of being set up for the lighter label of MSBP these so called professionals forgot the most important thing of all the long term interests of the child contact.

Not only is the biological parent set up so it the adoptive parent  especially if they do not have a full disclosure of the family held medical history.You never know what blood you are getting is so right. Never forget this !

My main objective is to point out the problems a parent will be having when  dealing with diagnosis an with the problem of finding a donor for the child/adult who has lost contact post final hearing after the set up stage. The real facts are it takes far to long going through the system again an it costs too much money .

Let us look at how your going to be blame for court. You know when your child is ill or has asthma? You take the child to the doctors right? Yes I would if I was concerned if the child is ill or has symptoms. The MSBP mother is known to have taken the child to the GP a lot. This is not true for us I have written evidence. This did not stop a doctor in closed court saying that my son never had asthma.The expert witness in our case is Dr  Claire Sturge who must be in her 80′s now.In her evidence she described a typical MSBP mother who liked to give medicine to a child who did not need it ,Dr Sturge said I over dosed my son on the return journey back to the UK with asthma inhalers . I thought my son had croup or a bad chest infection he had a history of asthma. This is taken from a Springer link type in Addenbrooke’s hospital childhood leukaemia ………….Abstract.In short you could have a child presenting with a normal infection an it could be a massive tumor on their chest just like my son here in the photo . I did not know an neither did the doctors until the X-rayed him in the L& D hospital .

Introduction  Leukaemia and lymphoma may present with symptoms and signs mimicking common respiratory conditions of childhood such as asthma or croup. The UK National Institute for Clinical Excellence guidelines for referral for suspected cancer state that “the primary healthcare professional should be ready to review the initial diagnosis in patients in whom common symptoms do not resolve as expected” and “must be alert to the possibility of cancer when confronted by unusual symptom patterns” (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2005).
Results and discussion  A child with an undiagnosed mediastinal mass presenting with signs and symptoms suggestive of asthma or croup may be given oral systemic steroids. We report four such illustrative cases presenting to a single institution within the last 3 years.
Conclusion  We highlight key points from the history and examination findings which should lead to review of the original diagnosis, the benefit of early chest X-ray in such cases and the dangers of steroid pretreatment.

Keywords  Asthma - Cancer - Chest X-ray - Croup - Leukaemia - Lymphoma

I found this link last night the doctors who treated my son in Addenbrooke’s hospital  now write a paper on these cases  . This is how Mediiastinal masses masquerading as common respiratory conditions of childhood:a case series. Available to buy online


Oct 14 2009

Bare Faced Lies From Martin Narey!

The last time I saw Clive Anderson was  outside of the  London Dungeon  as he walked past me sometime last year ,he had on a black turtle neck sweater and black trousers.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00n9mdf/The_One_Show_12_10_2009/

There was also a young man working the crowd  as the crowd were waiting in the long queue for the London Dungeon attraction. This man was in a cloak  with a horrible prop  which was a bloody head on a stick . I took a photo for my son on my mobile phone  but not 1 of Clive Anderson . I caught up with theBBC One Showlast night  Clive  Anderson was on there  along with Martin Narey from the Barnado’s Charity. Jesus the bare faced lies from Mr Narey so naughty  Mr Narey but  so “sincere with it to mash up the adoption figures”. Then again it is only  a business, it is not about support or helping families, if it is it is helping the wrong families the 1′s that can not be fixed just not fixing us families the 1′s who can cook  budget an take apart in costly court cases an attend every meeting for social services. The families who are clever enough to ask questions about the central government hand outs for adoption cases.

I was always a big fan of Clive  Anderson he told it how it was on his programme what was the title of this programme?it has slipped my mind.I remember this though Clive  said he thought “Margaret Thatcher was a glove puppet for the bankers,  she was a distraction put up front “, whilst the bankers took all of the money out of the country.

Clive Anderosn was right about this .The parents who have been through the system of doing core assessments for court would say this about   Mr Narey an the rest of the charities they are using similar tactics for their own ends….

The real figures we want you to know simply as  a public interest matter.  These MP’s  say they do not know where they are. The real  facts for  serious issues regarding child protection they can not cover even the basics of or the mainstream media are not so stupid they are told to cover only issues like child protection like this.

This is where we come in as parents first , we are experts as we have seen behind the scenes .The MP’s are frightened to sit in a room with us campaigners an take the grilling about the faults that want fixing and who can blame them really.

If you have learnt anything from reading this blog it is how useless they are in dealing http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/oct/02/martin-narey-banardos-child-protection   with families get back their children from social services or adoption. There are literally a file  box full of letters to my own MP Kelvin Hopkins dating back nearly 5 years now.

http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/looked_after_children_352#incoming-48203So what has changed ? Nothing has changed except I have met more distraught families who have just lost their cases and their children.


Oct 11 2008

What Kind of Expert are You ?

Tag: Uncategorized,psychiatric abuseadmin @ 8:13 am
Solicitor says"let me know when expert is arriving"?

Have a solicitor present when EW arrives to do a report for court.

I feel ill this week as the painkillers have upset my stomach after recent surgery .This now feels like a run up to a flare up of Ulcerative Colitis, so this week, I went for blood test I have been told to up the Lanzoprazole to 2 a day now and am taking Metronidazole . For any one who has insight about this disease or has this incurable disease I have sympathy for you .

Then if you are like me , you will then have to suffer being labelled in closed court by doctors as having “abnormal illness behaviour”. I hear this is nothing new , as I finished reading” Provoked” I found myself unable to put down the book.

I read about Southall Black Sister’s Campaigner’s , how 1 lady got in to a medical conference as a char lady serving refreshments to people attending the conference. I would also like to attend a medical conference and throw up into the air my medical notes, whilst this Dr Clarie Sturge is chairing ,or training future doctors to give evidence.She mislead the courts in 2005 by saying” I do not have UC “however, this was later confirmed by another expert witness. I am shocked she even said this in the first place,: I mean pathology should read as science based evidence. What is this doctors field of expertise in ? It can not be medicine surely ?

This is frightening to observe psychiatry ,applied to medical science, or medical evidence being tainted or tampered with ,then presented as a report to a judge who also has little or no knowledge of science. There is no justification in using junk science with pathology treat the cause and not the & symptom. It is too long ,it is too dangerous, and it is evil to say this serious medical disease is in fact somatic when it is well know as an immune problem .

Even in closed court you do not, persecute families for having an illness. This is the reality :o r abnormality that you can expect to be subjected to when taking part in reports written up for court. This is not acceptable, or is it right ,to expect any human being ,to have to accept this kind of treatment.

This is what it boils down to for mothers who have been abused by the system. It is referred to now or known as psychiatric threat therapy,mostly it happens to mothers who are in custody battles in closed court or about to lose their babies in forced adoption cases.

Going back now to the medical conferences. Thank you to a friend who sent me an e-mail showing me this doctor charges