Lynda Mac

I would rather not be in their position  would you ?.

“The government is clear that every child’s case should be dealt with as quickly as possible to minimise trauma and keep young people safe from harm.”ttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-10896335http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-10908026

More bullshit: why does it take 42 weeks for finding of FACT?

It is never child abuse when the corporate parent is failing children by not completing the parenting assessments.If they had of completed through assessments of my ex-partner & his wife we would not have to read the paperwork saying my son stank of cigarettes and so did the house. What happened to this? it got covered up along with the rest of it. The courts said Luton Local Authority was in dereliction of duty of care for C and left it at that . It is an “IN-HOUSE PROBABLY FOR THE LA TO SORT OUT”.

This is the space I will leave to put in the notes of Sharon Andrews family aid and Julie Tadd Social Worker  when they wrote they stank their clothes reeked of it after a house visit……. The foster carer Grace Human said the same C stank of cigarettes when they had him visit for respite care over a week end he turned up with no mouth wash , no medication more important of all and stinking of cigarettes. Now don’t you find it very odd that it is not child abuse when the LA are involved in court and have a father on a supervision order?

The courts attitude stinks ! I want to know does this top GP  Steven Field want to see this paperwork concerning Luton Social Services and a father smoking in front of a seriously ill child in the car and in the house.

At the time  when this case was live in 2004-2006 this child was in remission from T cell Leukaemia and is having 3 years treatment and maintenance oral medication daily for 3 years  thats all and the father could not be bothered to stop smoking.

http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/med/about/advisoryboard/field/

http://www.uksocialworkers.co.uk/

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-10908026

Family lawyer Christina Blacklaws said social workers dealing with public law cases were often inexperienced, lacking in confidence and simply “overwhelmed” by their workload.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/mar/24/social-worker-abuse-online?showallcomments=true#end-of-comments

Prior to this article in the Guardian I would have said nothing as you can see the paperwork lay dormant for 5 years so I am not going to let sleeping dogs lie not now the Guardian have written this article and moreover the Guardian never let me post a comment in reply to this. It never crossed my mind to ever consider doing this so thank you for giving me an idea to show the public what it is really like to work with the other side of creepy individuals who have infiltrated social services and have got issues left unresolved and are given a license to destroy families with making a personal war on a daily attack on  parents in core assessments for court.

Please see an application put in by a vindictive social worker  to the judge for to take out an injunction against me because she says she is feeling intimidated!!!! Only because she is guilty of being found out and can not live with the fact that I am onto her and her next move.

The judge refused this as they knew I would breach this or any other injunction.The reason for a refusal was not because it was OTT . All I said was hello the judge in all fairness was concerned for my son C finding out I was in prison it would make him scared and possible impact on his health whilst having 3 years treatment. The Social worker personalized this case and I stood my ground when she lied , she committed perjury and even when she and the lesbian Grace Human colluded their statements for court.

The social workers statement to the Judge Mac Gregor for an injunction. It is taking matters a bit to far as I have only said hello in the changing rooms of a gym. The social worker has not been attacked ,even though she provoked me many times I never snapped. Unlike some I could mention. Julie Tadd has been well protected and the perjury and lies she put before the court she was confident that she would get away with it. What she was not prepared for was being seen in nothing but a towel and saying hello to a client she thought would ordinarily be sat in a pub drowning their sorrows at having been torn apart from their child.

I had a lifestyle before social services stepped in. Since then my civil liberties have been effected in what I can and can not do. I have just been cleared of bankruptcy so think that I will be able to afford a gym membership again so will return, and this time will show the public how they waste taxpayers money trying to get injunctions.


The Guardian referred to us bloggers as hating social workers……

I want to suggest that Rachel Williams who wrote that take my place and see if you can do any better .It cost me thousands to nanny this idiot an her side kicks .This Social Worker destroyed families simply because she could get away with it. She done so  just swapped names over in reports and said no change. Want to see the reports? Clayton V Clayton …….

I would like to see Miss Williams try  spending 42 weeks after  signing a working agreement to work with this senior social worker Julie Tadd I bet you could not do it and if you can then what did you have to do admit to something that you did not have and spend 2 years paying for it and lose your job in the process, your home….. If you can not comprehend what it is like to have to nanny a stupid individual ,that is always telling lies, can not turn up on time ,who also lacks drive , energy and has no sense of direction when driving to Addenbrooke’s hospital or to your home address with a travel warrant then it is time you learnt why parents are set up to fail and have no respect for social workers or the legal team who have nothing better to do than send out letters of warning to their clients for saying hello in a gym.

Meet the Fooker Social Worker !

I am going to use all of this research dates times and who done what to make it work for my family. I am going to document the case with a book. To hell with professionals and MP’s I have no gag order the lot of you are getting named and shamed for making money out of the fact that my son had cancer  if it was not for my son getting cancer I would never have been made a referral to social services ,this quote is from Claire Sturge ,so sue me if you have got the bottle for it. Only thing is,this is your own bloody paperwork it is your own dirty work penned by you .

I will show the general public what kind of best interest this case was really in.

These professionals are pond life , educated scum of the earth working in secret with a pack mentally .  I am so tempted to post on this blog just how they had a shopping list for an expert witness for me that took months to find whilst they rejected another expert witness. I doubt any parent could have fathomed this 1 out whilst focusing on a seriously ill child and trying to  get as much contact to her child.

I am working on my own case right now and putting together the evidence and explaining to the GMC how long this took to get my copies of the paperwork to put events real facts of what really happened instead of complete hogwash supplied by expert witnesses.

http://www.youtube.com/user/liverpoollou6#p/u/33/nk0er4k3nsY

Take a look at this  a student at University suspended from placement after reading her own file. Trying to get the  general public to wake up about the information being collected , stored and retrieved for court.

I want you to think for a moment what you would do if 1 of these trainee social workers were set lose on your family.I know a mother turned up at the pre -school nursery and her son was kidnapped.

This is the thing they gave us for a social worker Julie Tadd happy in her work so much she has a child to take away with her from the care pool whenever she wants. http://www.communitycare.co.uk/carespace/forums/suspension-from-a-placement-6655.aspx

If you to,are like me now , a non- resident parent with no contact at all, and no rights even though you still have PR you will be finding out how useless this  Parental Responsibility  really is ,and  also how utterly  useless the Local Authority can really be in situations when they need to step in and address putting right their past mistakes.

Contrary to the reports about me being an “unsuitable  option” shall we say,as a  parent for my son  it was also reported I am  only interested in my own needs ! I have invested a lot of time studying many  other cases post court ,however  none of the cases are similar to ours.In that  the children are not diagnosed with leukaemia  they are healthy .

Moving on now I am however concerned with these facts concerning closed adoption scandals there is no medical date going over with the child. What happens if they get leukeamia?

I am the only on all accounts the only mother to speak out frankly about losing a child with cancer who has survived but is still missing post UK secret courts. When the case was live on Fassit years ago  I could not see no other case like it at all in the UK .I have seen a YT video on CNN Michelle Lafantasie the case of a boy in the Canada he was removed by the hospital staff , over zealous  snatched the boy ,but I have yet to hear about a similar case here in the UK  I was aware of children being removed in hospital when staying in Addenbrookes and I accept that some families can not cope however there was no need to do what they done to us concerning contact .

The professionals looking at this case ,can all see the conflict of interest for the expert  Dr Claire Sturge , this now looks like it has been an  experiment  of some kind ,with forcing a seriously ill child into  placement with a virtual stranger  what a case study just waiting for this to happen.

My child at times was not willing to go to contact  before he had cancer so when he said no to seeing his dad in hospital it was dealt with as implacable hostility ,and he was certainly not willing to go live with dad later on when the courts made their final decision .

G is turned away from contact here

To make matters more complex than they already were ,and to make sure that they could add as much stress of it all of this case when it was live  I was also set up for a lighter label of   MSBP ,added to this the false allegation of  neglect, and finally wait for it ,emotional harm too.

It was never considered at all by these experts how contact would be dealt with later on ,they simply focused on getting rid of 1 parent  which happened to be me ,so that the other parent can have ” a relationship”. I would not envy my ex-partner in having to take on this role at all. My ex-partner was used as well if he would only own up to it and for once he deserved to be used so for this I will thank the courts he deserved to be dealt with and made to be a full time parent with all the responsibilities that go with it that he could not be ordinarily bothered with before his son got leukaemia.

As for anything else which Dr Sturge has plans for in the future .I will refuse to take part in any other study either  now or in the future  concerning attachment  and you can include ever working with social services again.In 1 of her reports for court  I read she wrote : again she will have problems when she gets him back again.This indicates she was talking from experience and she has done this before to other mothers……..

This is my son Dr Joan Claire Sturge is talking about. Maybe her interests are in causing problems or rather creating problems that are simply not there at all.

So the experience has left me wondering how other families who have also been set up are going to find Information which could potentially save their  children’s lives in the future,” if these children  are adopted.or   become critically ill in the future and stuck in care having lost all contact with their birth families. thes children have been sold out .Some are said to be lost the paperwork has gone missing .

” “The Right to Life  issues and other serious matters for debate and the right to leave a true genetic key is now being debated by MP’s concerning forced adoption cases,I have to say  it has  so been hard working with these professionals ,as they say they do not understand this.

When I copy & paste d off FB an adopted child/adult saying  they are living with cancer or dying from cancer  then I ring up  the MP’s office and ask now do you UNDERSTAND ?

The task is very difficult with the prime example here which should chill you to the core as we say this  paperwork” a file which should be kept on record until the child is 18 years old.

Sorry darling not in this lifetime are you getting your file

Coming back to the communication with schools .What is very clear, is this ,the schools are anything  but “willing” from now on to share a “true picture of   exactly what is wrong or what is happening to your lost child with no contact ”

.The schools are NOT willing to share ALL the facts or tell it like it is . So god knows what you will be getting back in the future,that is  if you get your child back .That is if, and a big IF  they do not end up on drugs or drink homeless on the streets . Just how many people in care end up being homeless ,thinking they are not wanted or cared for?

What percentage of homeless people are out of care and who can blame them after living a social services and a closed court lie for the majority for most of their childhood thinking it is not in there best interests to contact their birth family.

HAVE YOU ALSO NOTICED THIS ,THEY WILL NOT SHARE INFORMATION OR SCHOOL FILES USING THE DATA OF PROTECTION ACT?

This is where we are 5 years down the line now, after experts like Glaser & Stuge suggest well dressed children are in need of protection against emotional harm . My message to you  both is this ,why don’t you try  doing  an honest days work for an honest days pay .Go get your out here on You Tube .That is if you are really interested in basic child protection issues.

I have every right to be concerned about my child as other mothers like me we are watching what happens next to our children .I am getting a much better picture on You Tube than the Local Authority are giving me .

In fact I have just rang them up and shared the links and told them we are now discussing this on Facebook with main stream parents how the Social Care is not working in the Child’s Best Interests. These experts need to go on You Tube an protect the interest of these children.

Let the good old working taxpayer who pays for all of this join up the dots about the true facts about social care in the community.Emotion Harm Experts

Now then you would have to agree with me that this paperwork all seems  so academic now. This so called paperwork carefully selected on the basis of evidence to remove your child from your care. People need to question the way this is done and not put before a jury ?

Please take a look at these links here , these are the sort of subscribers that my son is attracting to his videos, I only ask this question , would they be good enough to socialize with your children ? If the answer is no then think about our children this is what happened to our children when the state stepped in and the courts rubber stamped the paperwork for them to get away with anything

http://www.youtube.com/user/loganep2401

http://www.youtube.comExperts 4 Court/

Do You ever ask yourself WHY  you  TRUSTED  and signed the working agreement document with Social Services?

I trusted the Social Services ,solicitors and courts to be honest . So I completely opened the door to my home and worked with the social workers in good faith,that was in April 2004 – February 2005   the early days, simply because that was the kind of person I was , that person has  I am glad to say died a shocking death in 2006 and paid a hefty price for making this mistake.

Since then I have moved on to 2009 and I said I will not work with Social Services or courts even if that means I will get back my child,and this said I will not take this back that is how strong I feel ,and who can blame me for  taking  a much more  cynical  attitude , also  a hardline approach is very much needed when working with these  professionals. I would doubt a solicitor  or a social worker would dare try it on with me again .

So by the time they finished stitching me up in a closed court , the working relationship if that was the title you could give to it  was anything but that, working with us  was a very difficult experience quoted Dale Wood Cafcass legal guardian to my son.

It would be unfair, to say that I had a good working arrangement with this social worker for a lot of reasons, the biggest reason was she personalized the case from the start, and she also had a very deformed and twisted mind. I found her child like , and very petty and very scruffy to be seen out with in the community I hated the stares people would look at her  trailing around 3 paces behind us  ……….

She would  ideally want to be in my house early in the morning , saying “I am outside your door”, tough I am on the bus in 3 roads up from where you are parked up or watching her do her 15 minutes work out in the  same gym I was going to . I refused to speak to her in the end , hung up on her ,would not go in a room with her at Unity House the more you talked the more they lied about what you said, she even tried to get an injunction out against me saying hello to her in the changing rooms of the gym. She never succeeded ,as the judge said it would scare my son to know I was in prison.

She told Judge Mac Gregor she was scared of me ,and wanted an injunction, she had good reason to be scared she knew I was on to her and she was a liar. Julie Tadd knew her game was up ,as much as she tried to wind up me or my eldest son we laughed at her  for it. At the final hearing she waited for the drama of screaming match to start and again she never got it ,so  when she and her side kick Sharon Andrews expected me to fall to bits, or collapse I retreated and went on holiday ,if the professionals went on holiday I went on holiday . I did say in court to her I could kiss you ,you know ,as I thank her  for doing everything you have done. I now have a much better life than you…. .Her face was a picture when I said this , this process is all about destroying a persons world . I will never forget her face when I said this to her, she let it slip the face was gutted, she turns around in Debenham’s to get a good look at me when she sees me in town. I let her as she can look take a good look at all the hours wasted and thousands of taxpayers money on the mother who never went down for nothing at all.

The working agreement was never signed again , the expert was never trusted either , if she asked to see me again which she did after the final hearing was over , I took my  solicitor with me.I learned to suss people  out in my environment very quickly,also what they wanted from me or wanted me to do next . I questioned the cost of it all and how much it was bankrupting me to continue with working with the courts for so long .

If I was to survive the court experience I needed to function on the same level as them without emotion I soon got sick of being played my friend said they are so predictable.

It has sadly left me with no respect for professionals ,and I  will never completely   trust anyone again after this ,and who can blame me for this I have been abused by all and sundry .I would also have to say that this,  the whole CLOSED  court experience  has hardened me up,much more than I ever expected I would dare to admit too. I got asked a few weeks ago by a doctor if I was a social worker and I can talk like I have no child  without the emotion . So think again if you are heading to the Family courts trust no one. As these respectable professionals  can and will  use you,simply  just because they can get away with it in a secret court.

I was probably no different than the next person to trust a professional . The general public put their  trust in the multi-agency groups and expect them to be honest,and do their job.

It was our experience that they were anything but honest or even cared about the children in their line of duty.

The foster carer was not much different it was for her all about the money. I got the odd homemade card or present a few sweets that are in a box with so many kisses and I love you Mum on the paperwork just does not add up. The foster carer said that my son never asked about me or asked when he would see me next.Then again it is very good money for a special needs child some say £500 a week all in plus petrol so you work out if it pays to tell the truth especially if you have a child who is sick and can not fight back .

What must the children think about their parents , little do they know they have had contact stopped for no reason whilst they settle 3 months nothing not a phone call, or your Easter egg is sitting on the social workers desk for 3 months until it had gone green moldy.

Or how they stop the mothers contact and force a child to go see dad whether  they have expressly wished not to go does not matter.The expert witness says she has specific wishes how this must be done.

Someone said to me it is amazing how long they will keep this up covering up the lies the perjury an most of all protecting the professionals who write this stuff for court.

If somebody else is reading this did you have this social worker Julie Tadd? and did you get nowhere with your complaints . Please can somebody tell me if they know if she also came out of the systems care pool ? Was she put in care as a child? This could explain a lot and why she was off work for 1 year after taking a beautiful child out of the care pool.

I did ask Kelvin Hopkins can he find out how many social workers in Luton take away children and go on maternity leave for 1 year ? I also want to know do they put the children back in the pool and start again when they have to go missing for a long time when they are the centre of a dodgy case like ours was .