They don’t call it legal kidnapping or child trafficking for nothing. The comments are worthy of taking a look at, I thought the foster carer left a good comment until the FC  left out how much money  they  too were also collecting from the local purse.

I also see the contact centres got  a mention.http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/aug/20/care-assessment-limited-time-scale

Modern day Children's Prison in the UK

Social Worker Sitting in the seat behind us with her head down.

Theses contact centre cost taxpayers a lot of money out of local government money  on average it costs  a session per family  on ( £35- £75 an hour see the link for YT letter from MP Kelvin Hopkins done a FOI to Luton LA )  and who controls these private sector business schemes (why ex social workers or ex SS managers )which are run to abuse children’s rights and primarily set out to degrade children .

Finding of Fact.

This should not take 42 weeks or 30 weeks .Finding of fact ,it should be found at the start of proceedings .It should be a criminal matter after being  found and dealt with in the criminal court .That is if you have been done for real child abuse . The fact is the courts are reclassifying what constitutes for child abuse .

This emotional harm, or significant  risk of emotional harm & needs to be protected from is inserted quiet innocently  into documents statements  at the final hearing  stages  for court you never see the words significant being used at the start of proceedings. The parents will not know the significance of these words or the cost of their use in closed court until they realize they have lost their child for ever to a group of people (multi agency groups of professionals )who will not let go .

Finally after a court makes a decision based on bogus expensive reports for court . Then    these practitioners have paved a way for themselves to have  a very abnormal relationship with your child/children. This should sound like it is ringing alarm bells with you now. The taxpayers are now paying indefinitely for theses so called practitioners to keep on going whilst all along they  are making a vast amount of money out of children’s misery  .  These professionals realistically in all probability could not ever make this kind of money  anywhere else, but in a secret court.

The taxpayers are paying  heavily for these practitioners to  take as much time off on holiday off work with stress ( same stress they remove your children for )and keep returning back to court for as long as your child’s life expires and dies a death worth meeting if it is to shake of these horror of a misfortune the courts have inflicted on children.

Question for MP Mr Dobson what happened to a public inquiry for this parents daughter ?

We are still waiting for answers Mr Dobson

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrwXzGFVAcc&feature=channel

Click to see the cost to you the taxpayer .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FlcUECQ-pQ&feature=related

I would rather not be in their position  would you ?.

There you go, the searches  for yesterday and today,does anybody else agree this  is a general public interest in what is happening to families in these closed (kangeroo)courts ?

Today

Yesterday

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-10876410

Sadly another case similar to the Spain case concerning Stafford Social Services,both mothers driven to the point of no return. I would say the professionals have induced more than enough trauma. I wonder if covert studies are going on to see if people snap .

The courts & social services are part of the problem and create these cases.

Post-mortem examinations are due to be carried out on the dead children, who were at the centre of a custody battle between their parents.st reading another story from the BBC website.

I think it is high time the professionals had an online meeting to discuss the subject of ex-clients passing first hand experience of being abused in assessments for court. I want you to know how dangerous this sharing of files and paperwork is going to be in the future when put it the wrong hands. I also acknowledge my part and take full responsibility  in this file sharing ,I am very anxious as you should be anxious to find that the best people to manipulate these reports and assessments are going to be child abusers .

We have found this group of people work the hardest of all to find out more online from other parents about what goes on when they send you to see psychs for court. So once you accept that now working in this industry has become increasingly  dangerous to all concerned you will have to also  take on board the fact that there is no way forward but to share this information with everyone online and that includes you too.

I would not want to be an expert witness facing the next clued up client if they are the real thing . Left with no choice now as this information is for all that have the mental capacity to pick up on just how many bogus individuals are out there acting in the role of practitioners.

Let’s have a look at the previous posts concerning buying text books for assessing personality testing and who is qualified to do this for court. Hindsight is a wonderful thing, however now you are here why not take down theses questions for your solicitor and expert witness before you commit to taking a series of carefully selected tests (all set up to make you look like you have or may have a personality disorder not that you are mentally ill or anything .)

Looks Innocent Enough!

This has to be the next best thing the professionals need to secure for court to make it look like you are going to be a significant risk of harming your child for the purposes of swaying the judge. They pay a significant amount of money to the expert to do the report that they want them to write. If you are anything like me you will pick up on the paperwork very early on even though there will be nothing that you can do about this at the time.

Questions for your solicitor to ask the expert witness.

You  want a copy of the psychometric tests that I am going to have to take and the information to say these tests are either accepted here in the UK they are not out of date.

You want a witness to sit in with me like you , I want the transcripts of the meetings.

You want copies of the professionals meetings on time and all of them.

You want to see the bills for what each person expert is getting paid .

You want copies of all the paperwork for court not just some of it.

Most of all you want the final hearing transcripts of what gets said in Kangeroo court.

http://www.arachnoid.com/psychology/

Thanks to Colby for sharing this link it is defining what psychology is and how it is being used in court.

Now I am wondering if Mr Social Worker/Psychiatric nurse here is reading this? What part of an untrained social worker / a family aid worker is qualified to assess a parent for court?

I kept a diary of when I was given information concerning my sons welfare and medical treatment. I am wondering what kind of training she has had to assess me for court . The GMC are now reading nearly 6 years down the line paperwork cross referenced to support she has not given a true or accurate account of events.

Now then the next question I have is :what is the Family aid worker’s mental capacity functioning like , and how did she find employment in social care?

Did you also know this : the GMC can make a doctor take a mental health test ? Sadly for us it is too late , however it is not too late for you to question what is going to happen to you going through this corrupt system that is nothing but  a running gravy train for experts & solicitors.

http://www.communitycare.co.uk/carespace/media/stuart_sorensen/amj-assessing-mental-capacity-part-2-31889.aspx

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2NfsTJUOM4&feature=player_embedded

Well it seems we are not alone in failing the core assessments or interviews either.

Social workers rant about out of date interview process. What about the out of date MMP1-2 Graham Flatman done on me ? Never mind can’t get a job in social care, we can not get our children back after out of date reports for over £5,000 are being sought and paid for.

http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/990113-overview

http://www.communitycare.co.uk/carespace/forums/outdated-interview-processess-8129.aspx

Reply

Marbles78 replied on 1 Aug 2010 11:12 AM

rated by 0 users

The reason for the prevelance of points based systems in recruiting is mostly due to having to demonstrate fairness in the process. Its very easy for unsuccessful applicants to challenge employers on the grounds of discrimination and the employer has to be able to show a consistent system was used. Therfore the points based system of ‘magic answers’ takes prevelance and then if there is more than one approprately scored candidate things like experience and personal qualities are then taken into consideration.

Thats how I believe it to work anyway, I’m not personally involved in recruitment.

Not to worry your not the only people to have your  say about the closed courts , the doors are literally being blown off the courts  hinges in one way or another via a splattering of paperwork going viral online which can’t be all bad. Message to legals is :You will be alright if you can find a new career where you have to do an honest days work,there is now a serious threat to professionals who think they can hoodwink clients to play the legal game to lose their children.

The confidential legal game is well and truly declared   over, as parents will not work with you . Parents have gone past caring now  as there is clearly no chance of justice, then expect to be exposed in one way or the other.

Worried about Pysch Reports or in it 2 bin it solicitors then Ring me up .I do not charge or ask for money ,only that you share the information with another desperate parent who needs it.

http://pinktape.co.uk/

http://heatherbrooke.org/2010/article-court-secrecy/ Please click on the link.

http://www.ukcolumn.org/

http://www.lyndamac.com/ Let Me know if you have rang up and requested to attend this meeting and if you get accepted. I do hope this is not just another rushed survey like all of the rest .

http://www.justice.gov.uk/reviews/family-justice-intro.htm

http://pinktape.co.uk/

Lessons to be learned,parents have documented evidence of abuse and serious risk to children in care or placements. If you are interested in seeing our paperwork then pick up the phone and let me attend.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-10770907

Or do I have to wait painstakingly a few more years for my son to come out of remission from ALL T cell for all the multi- agency neglect and dereliction of duty of care to him to be covered up  only to repeat it’s self?

• Please take the time to click on the link you will work out just how risky it is in the wrong experts hands making a choice what kit to buy and what test to do for court . Thanks to Jerry Lonsdale for sharing. Send an e-mail  to see the pdf shopping list for an application to buy  all of this .The opportunity to commit fraud and say that you are at such a level and buy these kits are just frightening. With bogus experts witnesses being found out by buying papers online it just does not bear thinking about really.
• Then look at the website PearsonAssessments.com

I am now wondering why the HPC and the BPS do not  do a proper assessment of these so called experts for court. The times to do the test the conditions of people who are threatened to undertake these tests for court proceedings for child custody or child protection issues.

This MMP1-2 test says it is for mental health problems. The GMC have accepted a report from Addenbrookes in house psychiatrist said they found no mental health problems I was stressed at finding out my son had leukeamia. I have the documents to prove this.

Graham Flatman carried out a number of tests and it took 5 hours not  the time quoted here.  These kits are very cheap to buy and he charged almost £6,000 .If asked how he got his results the HPC and the BPS should ask him what text books he used and why he chose these text books to work from. Please note that the results were alarming with only 54% on 1 test and 75% for others take a good look around at the percentage of proof of the validity of these reports.

• http://www.pearsonassessments.com/pai/
• Administration:
• Paper-and-pencil, CD or computer administration
  Completion Time: 35-50 minutes (338 true/false items)
  Reading Level: 5th grade (Lexile average), 4.5 grade (Flesch-Kincaid 
  Report Options: Scoring and Interpretive
• Qualification level: C-Level
• Publication Date: 2008
• Ages /

• 
  

  The standard has evolved.

  Composed of 338 items, with the RC (Restructured Clinical) Scales at its core, the MMPI-2-RF builds on the strengths of the MMPI®-2 test to create a new standard. Psychometrically up-to-date, the MMPI-2-RF is linked to current models of psychopathology and personality. A comprehensive technical manual for the MMPI-2-RF reports empirical correlates of the scales in a range of settings, including mental health inpatient and outpatient clinics, substance abuse treatment centers, criminal court proceedings, personal injury and disability evaluations, and public safety employment evaluations.

  The MMPI-2-RF provides a valuable alternative to the MMPI-2 test, not a replacement. The MMPI-2 test continues to be published and fully supported by the University of Minnesota Press and distributed exclusively by Pearson.

  How to use this test

  The MMPI-2-RF aids clinicians in the assessment of mental disorders, identification of specific problem areas, and treatment planning in a variety of settings. The test can be used to help:

  • Assess major symptoms of psychopathology, personality characteristics, and behavioral proclivities.
  • Evaluate participants in substance abuse programs and select appropriate treatment approaches.
  • Assess medical patients and design effective treatment strategies, including chronic pain management.
  • Support college and career counseling recommendations
  • Provide valuable insight for marriage and family counseling.
  • Support classification, treatment, and management decisions in criminal justice and correctional settings.
  • Identify high-risk candidates in public safety screening and selection settings.
  • Give strong empirical foundation for expert testimony in forensic evaluations.

  Key Features

  • Comprehensive technical manual that presents empirical data.The technical manual reports empirical correlates of the scales in a range of settings, including mental health inpatient and outpatient clinics, substance abuse treatment centers, criminal court proceedings, personal injury and disability evaluations, and public safety employment evaluations.
  • Nationally representative normative sample. Drawn from the MMPI-2 normative sample, the MMPI-2-RF normative sample consists of 2,276 men and women between the ages of 18 and 80 from several regions and diverse communities in the U.S.
  • Availability of comparison samples. Descriptive data from a broad range of settings make it possible for test users to compare individual test results with relevant reference groups in settings such as mental health, medical, forensic, criminal justice, and public safety.
  • Only 35–50 minutes to administer.
    Save even more time—administration by computer takes only 25–35 minutes.

  New software and report features

  • Audio on-screen administration of the MMPI-2-RF
  • Convert MMPI-2 records to MMPI-2-RF records for comparison, click to download directions
  • Add comparative means and standard deviations for 16 different settings to your MMPI-2-RF Interpretive Report (product code #51563) or MMPI-2-RF Score Report (product code #51562)
  • Add annotation, end notes, and hover text to your MMPI-2-RF Interpretive Report—see illustration below

  grades:
  Individuals 18 years and older

Yesterday

For  every click and every search done on the internet comes up and your found this could be affecting your career and your business. This blogs works fine in the interests of Children & Families.