Lynda Mac

This answer your question from Vanessa Willingham via Sam Hallimonds Thread on facebook that was removed last night?

Why don’t you want to see your son? Reply because I say it is “harming him to continue with this kind of treatment bearing in mind all of your children were well not seriously ill or had a a poor immune system ,this made a huge difference to making a decision and sticking to it .I made the final decision to end contact after being messed about by Dr Claire Sturge stopping contact for 3 months whilst my son settled in and had no intention of returning only she asked me to come back as my son would not last out the year emotionally without seeing me.

When I returned this happened watch the video “RED FLAG  the cake …….. that is why and I am ending contact it is a joke  .Yvonne Crawford was taking the piss out of us in private and the reference to DVD’s and equipment I am a geek with a passion for media . This social worker is now exposed for lying and abusing his human rights and getting paid well for doing this by taxpayers.

My eldest son had the same treatment & lies and decided to walk away and I can't blame him.Sorry C we had enough of being used and abused for money. See you when you are older maybe if you have not been brainwashed.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1kQXOOwNHw

MP Kelvin Hopkins wants to know now what he can do for parents in this situation . Watch this space , behind the scenes parents are collating enough evidence to put a stop to taxpayers money being spent on flash cars for supervisors or ex social workers to set up private contact centres. Thanks to other parents for contributing estimate bills they were given for over £2,000 costs to see their  child. they could not afford simply because they were students or unemployed.

Please bear with me whilst I get used to the scanner as it is a new programme running . The following page 2 is being adjusted and posted later as the file is to big to load .Webmaster post it here if you will thanks.

It says:Goodbyes/farewells should be confined to the contact centreonly.Wind down time should be allocated to control the situation.

.  Any gifts/presents should be passed to the social worker/Supervisor (or  grease monkey) first and not directly to the child.

Refer to list of dos and don’ts previously discussed.( Implies I have done something wrong) see You tube video …….

The Department are to:-

. Provide the venue

. Provide the Social Worker /Supervisor for the contact ( taxpayer to pay £35- £50 per hour plus vat )

.Provide the transport for C to attend contact sessions. (As social services they do not trust the father to behave )

.Consider the termination of contact at Reviews.

I can really see the difference in these photographs the life and soul has gone out of my son . There can be no winners in a situation like this . All the father  got a custody of  was a shadow of who this child used to be  you can never re -write the fact that  C was happy & sociable and now looks miserable .

I hardly recognized this child as my own son(left front , with head down the man in black top is now in jail for a long time,stating a FACT ) who was once described as happy & sociable .

The body language is ringing alarm bells with me ,wonder what a professional would read into this?.

The so called happy family (not )group photograph that speaks loud and clear of  a child ,somebody with a legal personality who is not so happy or settled where he is ,and never will be, until you stop insulting him.

It is time that C was given access to the paperwork and not just  the files the  social services want to carefully select  to show you either .

I also read the comments on facebook to these photos and the message is you joker you do not have a clue  . What do you know ? you know nothing at all.  These do not look normal photographs to me of a normal family. Try if you must to put on a front for the next few years if you have to  but you are fooling nobody and this paperwork is coming OUT  .

Then why should child C be happy with this no contact to his birth mother & brother , he was tricked at 7 years old by his Cafass officer Dale Wood and his solicitor Patrick Persuko the words on the paper written up about contact are worthless shit.

Waiting to get back in again

Question to Patrick Perusko child’s legal representative : What happened to :the wishes & feelings of child C Mr Patrick Perusko .

G is turned away from contact here

Question to: Dale Wood  Cafcass :what happened to  the welfare check list or the long term interest of C to be able to contact all members of extended family to exhaust looking for a donor match should he come out of remission from T cell ALL  in the future or is the genetic key already found and stem cells harvested ?

boys enjoying flashing lollypops

The next question is this :what  ever happened to your morals or ethics when it came down to representing your client you sold him out by the £’s and set his mother up for a kanergoo court.
Anybody can see your child, the courts decide only you can’t see your child.

If this is Frank Bruno ,then  it would appear that Frank Bruno has seen my son, which is more than can be said for me .

Message from your mum, you want to change the rules surrounding this contact . Then all you have to do is  get a new solicitor and say you are Frazer Competent.

Fact is after you reach 12 years of age or over the courts have to listen to what you want .

I am going to make life harder for Cafcass & Luton Social Services. In stead of posting Sharon Andrews contact sheets and her in house e-mails on this post for all to see . Lets us play a game of cat and mouse with the Local Authority & Cafcass seen as on 02 June  I have been subscribed to this blog  by Sophie .Cappleman @cafcass.gsi.gov.

Message for Cafcass : Get your ass off my blog and get on with your job send me my paperwork for court .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTY3BS4DkAQ

I will post this information and set to private  and password protect this section and continue to support other families sort the paperwork for court. So if you want to contact me for help on here and I will be checking the IP addresses and taking precautions as this week I have been subjected this week  to a person claiming to be a victim when they were not a victim at all.

Let me state  my position .I have no time for child abusers and lack empathy so do not contact me or I will make a police complaint and track you down with the IP address.

Coming back to this paperwork penned by Sharon Andrews has been cross referenced and sent to the GMC to clarify all the false allegations made against me  . For example when Sharon Andrews family aid  sat for 1 hour in Addenbrookes hospital  by my sons bedside whilst he was sleeping or getting over a lumber puncture  it was a case of  either you or Julie Tadd were writing up the contact sheets you said my son C never asked to see me !

The pressure  which was put on a seriously ill  child to perform for social services ,within a timescale of 1- 2 hours  was horrendous to say the least . Did you not think for a moment that  the challenge was set far to high for a seriously ill child? Later on, I asked for copies of the files and the ICO told Luton SS to hand the copies over to me.

Contained within  this small file that was finally  sent out by Luton SS when accompanied by  the nurses notes from the solicitors bundles , which I  say I never got  the time, or copies of at the time the court case was live to read through all the bundles ,  also you can add to these bundles the  experts minutes meeting to these  just before the final  hearing with Grace Human foster carer .

Armed with all of this evidence , there was ample evidence not picked up by in it to bin it solicitors when cross relating this evidence to support that yourself & the foster carer painted a  very false picture of C’s wishes and feelings.

I have a question for Sharon Andrews how did you look C in the eye when he said this,( I want to see my mummy when am I going to see my mummy) and Alison Dowsett oncology nurse at Addenbrookes  recorded what he said in his medical notes. “I want to see my mummy?” I believe you  replied ,or said to him we are waiting for her to contact us.

How did that sit with you ? lying to a child .Do you lie to your own child at home? or the children you take out of the care pool ?

Would you ever explain your actions to C why you done this, when you reported that he never asked to see his mother? Would this information not be classified as emotional harm, and  would it not be upsetting for him to read in his case file .

This is such a mess now, as even if you say the file is destroyed like Cafcass you can never recover  once your paperwork has been read ,shared and discussed with a 3rd party using the Clayon Versus Clayton ruling.

I stand by the amount of time needed to assess a family and the so called training needs to clearly be  challenged by solicitor’s before putting this as evidence before a court. Social Services should be held accountable and be prosecuted for such maladministration of evidence.

Using the Clayton versus Clayton ruling anyone wishing to see this paperwork when cross referenced as it stands all penned by the multi-agency and has not been doctored .This would go half way to expalining the lies the Luton SS said I could not have copies of the file , they telephoned to say I could come in and look at it in Parys  Road Family centre.

If you are going through a similar ordeal when they delay your request and try and fob you off with looking at the file still persist and ask for copies of your file quoting the correct 40 days handover  section 7 of the DPA ……

I suggest to you that maybe the SS hide so much more  behind the excuse of protecting the child’s ID ,we need transparency in the closed courts as it is long over due.

Summer has finally arrived here in the UK , we have low clouds above us and the England flags   are flying high ,just take a look outside my window.

The children can be heard enjoying themselves all day long in the near by gardens splashing in their paddling pools, and I am here all alone reflecting on some great days here spent with friends with  some lovely memories of my son C & G with all their friends that used to frequent this sun trap of a garden in a nice, and friendly suburb in the south east of England .That was back in the day now there have been radical changes we have all had to  get used to , until  my counsel Jo Briggs from William Baches said to me ” play the game and go along for threat therapy ,or you will just have to get used to living on your own for a few years.”. This is England were we are simply not going to work with the courts.

I personally think the general public are blinkered when it comes to what goes on in public law cases. “The FACT THAT CHILD ABUSE HAS BEEN RECLASSIFIED “the fact is , that any family is fair game to this allegation of emotional harm there is no real criteria at all.  The general public do not understand this, or the legal consequences that follow this allegation, they certainly  would not put up with it.

So as a result of this not understanding what emotional harm is , and not until much later on then the “WORD SIGNIFICANT RISK OF EMOTIONAL HARM IS ADDED TO STATEMENTS” other naive parents are just as likely to fall into the same trap after a practitioner makes the first move by making a referral to social services.

There is a lot of talk about emotional harm ,but nobody knows what it really means or the costs involved when this is used for court, there was a discussion going on about courts ,and also what happened to contact post court  on Wikivorce  site , I later  got run off” Wikivorce”  first I was asked not to talk about mothers losing custody and was getting loads of hits blogging about this experience of  getting no contact, or very little contact .

Then out of the blue  there was a ding  dong if you could call it that,  as a young barrister pipes up and  said,”your case is public case”. I pointed out it started out in private and could end up in criminal court if this continues.

Whether we like it or not  the preconception is ” public case law is widely accepted you are guilty of something”. I was mug enough to concede to “emotional harm threshold” they doubled this with neglect at the 11th hour I never saw this one coming, me being done for “neglect”.  This is after  I originally complained about my son’s care in Addenbrooke’s hospital in 2004 . The web master deleted the comments.

Coming back to the neglect allegation , the courts are quick  enough to act on minor false allegations , but not so big they can admit finding of fault . The over all long term interests of my son are not clearly defined ,or the medical histories clear. The experts could not agree at one stage. So how the hell can we have confidence in these private courts ,where  an expert can step out of their field of expertise?

I think the dereliction of duty of care for the child and also neglect is with the courts to decide in the future surrounding his long term interests to find all options for contacts to family to find a genetic key.

Coming back to this genetic key ,nobody is really that interested in this issue ,until it is too late.This specific issue that nobody cares to mention( Your right to find data which is your genetic key from either your( key holder is) mother or you father should you need this. When, or “IF ” you become acutely ill.)http://www.adonorforgraham.com/

Here is a task for some think tank politician who is still interested in promoting all members of  people in society from all races , classes regardless of gender  the adopted class are a faceless group of people who otherwise have been marginalized from finding out their true heritage. That can not be right,let ahttp://www.channel4.com/news/articles/uk/social networking sites threaten adoption policy/3656647lone fair. then again that is draconian rule for you. Closed court never open corrupt forced adoption cases so that critically ill adults/or children can find a donor. “Death by Adoption”.

Research the up to date figures for children in care and post me a comment .

Research how many children a year get leukaemia or cancer post me a comment.

Research me a more realistic figure for adopted children as I do not accept that most children go home .

Then you have the real figure for a small group of people in society who are most at risk of not being able to find a donor .

1) The adoption agency and the NHS told me this. The GP’s in some cases won’t give out information when somebody is searching.

2) I am experiencing this with my sons GP have done for 6 years now.

3)It takes more than 8 weeks going through the Adoption Agencies and involves paying a fee.

4) Sometimes you do not have the time to wait for people to come forward that is why a global database needs to be done for children/adults who are not on a National register as donors or living in the UK.

This is a good enough specific issue to return to court I have a section 91/14 running until November 2010 Dale Wood the child’s legal guardian recommended that the judge give out this order as I got better at this court stuff than the legals anticipated then if you have had the misfortune like me to be kept hanging around the RCJ floating waiting for  your case to be heard then re-directed back to a judge who will just do you no questions asked, you get a very good at  reading the body language of these legal sharks, you know when you are being taken for a ride on their gravy train and that is another FACT !

Make no doubt about this :these courts need a shove into the 21st century as experts have not really been honest enough to come forward and let in the public into a public law court or private law court,and show their handy work for what it is. I might as well be stupid enough to  step up to the plate as nobody else is going to bother, Seen as I have experienced a child suddenly get ill and then the child being removed from my care and watch him living somewhere else with another family ,coping to live with leukeamia .This is not an adoption case ,but the rift is just as massive believe me . 

The long term interest are not considered to find a stem cell donor or a bone marrow donor for adopted children if they are and I have it wrong send me a link to a case online I am interested to know. I bet there is no case at all. The courts would rather write a case of the mental capacity of a parent well they are on a need to know basis and you know what? They do not need to know or be told anything at all.

Now as a mother who has be labeled with abnormal illness I find that odd. Adopted children/adults  have to wait and also note pay out a fee  to find a donor. The quarter of donors who are  most likely to be a match for them will be found in their birth parents fullstop.

As for the latest guidelines from the GMC I have to say this. I personally have got a doctor or a consultant to thank for the dilemma I am in for the duration until there is resolution of some sort. So you can say I have lost confidence in these proposals suggested. More than likely the GMC media had to do something about this issue with so many people online campaigning and discussing other adopted children/ adults rights to find the answers and how long that takes in a critical situation.

Your rights to find a donor.

e-mail from the GMC

Hello Linda,

Stephanie McNamara
Head of Media Relations
General Medical Council
350 Euston Road
London
NW1 3JN

Direct dial: 020 7189 5454 / 5444 (out of hours) Mobile: 07899793287

There is  another letter  I can post ,which was sent out to this GP look at the date, he is not going to hand over the medical notes. The contents of that letter are saying to him “it is surprising there is so little paperwork for his patient who attends Addenbrookes & cared shared 2nd hospital Luton & Dunstable from my solicitor Liz Oldham” What is in there I could show the GMC facts surrounding what my son had and what medication he has been administered whilst an expert witnesses says that I have harmed my son. The rest is evidence and will not be discussed on here otherwise the file will be destroyed.

I have read numerous times that your medical notes go over to experts but get this  your  ex-partners medical file notes will go walk about . Missing in transit or hardly anything is in the bundles  heading for kangeroo court. Yours are used only and then any future request for more paperwork looking for evidence  for complaint’s and you will be stonewalled.

The Local Authority should do random drug tests as the staff are either on something, or  just liars ,look at the comments about phone calls…..

This is the bottom line you are being set up . Keep your eye on your solicitors or where the paperwork ended up as you may need it for court of appeal. I read in Sally Clarks book somebody was prosecuted for non-disclosure of evidence. They knew there was evidence to prove her innocence of how 1 of her sons died. “STOLEN INNOCENCE “author John Batt.

It is high time somebody is prosecuted for delaying or for not disclosing  evidence for court. I am so pissed off with Cafcass ,Luton Social Services and this GP . he knows what it is I want . If I can not have the copies of my sons medical notes for court then tell the GMC “WHY NOT “.

http://amasci.com/weird/skepquot.html

I keep on looking at that Clic leaflet £5 for a nurse to help a family so a child could wake up in his or her own bed. Really as little as £5  ? Then why the £150 K on court costs ,meetings , and a retainer for foster care just incase the placement never works out.?

Why waste all these resources on a case with no previous  child protection concerns . When the money could have been spent on a family that needs it more than us?.How come it takes longer to pay out the travel costs if you are the child’s parent traveling to hospital , but you can clearly see how easily a foster carer or a social worker can get their fees paid? Why do you have to keep quiet when your child is so upset about the stupid trainers a foster carer has bought him? Why if these children are said to be  ” LOOKED AFTER CHILDREN” did I have to pay over £3,000 to provide him with what was missing from the foster care package to keep up some kind of normality for my son?

What would you do with £5 in the winter months during contact in Luton? I  have refused the £5 I should with hindsight took it out of the hand of the Local Authority and gave it to Clic  Sargent so some other child could be fortune to stay at home.

I have signed a working agreement not knowing how many thousands of pounds it is going to cost me and nearly result in getting a criminal record. Fact never sign the working agreement with SS.

Here is a fine for traveling on British Rail without a ticket. I almost got a criminal record. Luton SS  gave me a set time for supervised contact something like 10.00 am – 11.00am travelling from Luton to Cambridge. They never tell the multi-agency get the bus do they? They get paid £300 to put backsides on seats in council offices attending ICO meetings . Why should the parents get offered bus fare only?

I could leave a space here :and post the letter from Addenbrookes chest clinic saying that I needed to attend urgent out patient appointments. at the time . My diary was penciled in and out as I flitted like a mental health patient on speed to one location or meeting on any given day. The professionals on most days had  double booked meetings which clashed with emergencies later like blood transfusions for C and still the retard social worker offered bus fare only.

The financial burden of not being supported in the working agreement by Luton social services from get go cost me approximately £3,000 and more besides when traveling to contact and eventually sent me bankrupt in the process.

Somebody should also warn you, what this is like, being exposed to serious long term stressful  situations. Parents should be helped to identify the  un-workable arrangements they are being set up for for court . Then someone needs to show the new social services victim,just   how to cope with the trigger factors that lead up to neglecting your own health ,when working with social services .

Please watch your backs when you get to this stage.This part is very cleverly designed to finally make you out to be the label they are planning to set you up for with the experts witnesses . There is a lot of neuro lingistic programming used on route by some of these professionals which I will have to leave until another post . Ths part is very uncomfortable and it is difficult to long term be spoken to like this . You know what I mean it is the special way the social worker and the expert witness cuts you up constantly in conversation. Long term it is very clever as it sets you up on a daily basis to harm you,undermine your parenting skills ,also your thought processing skills to deal with problems.

For the majority of families the significant  amount of disruption in the early days of  losing custody  of your child/children to the corporate parent.For many families they will not be able to ride out the long term disruption in time off work. Which will lead up to not being able to provide for your family if you lose your job as you can not keep up with the meetings and so many 10 minutes court dates for directions  hearings ……

Sadly most people would  not be able to cope psychologically or keep up physically without something else going wrong for them within the 42 weeks timescale.

“THE FINDING OF FACT  STAGE.”

Some people are under the impression of  ”THE FINDING OF FACT FINDING”  is for the Local Authority to find this. This is not true ,sometimes your solicitor will do this ,however if your counsel(Coram based Barristers) tries to put you under pressure to admit the threshold for emotional harm simple say “NO” as once you have admitted to the threshold criteria,by the way you may be interested to know that there is none. After you admit this ,there is no way back for you or any realistic idea of any appeal in the future.

This is child’s play for solicitors,courts & social workers . Naive  families walk straight into all of this thinking these are ordinary court proceedings and the truth will come out reason will be given and chances given to families to have a fair trial. Forgive me for saying ,it is just like taking candy from a baby and mark my words “they do take your baby” .

Only this time you are being fed false hope,right  up until the final hearing it will not be clear until it is far to late, that you like thousands of other families who have gone before you have also been set up too.

There is no point of any return when you take this bad legal advice .

http://www.badenochandclark.com/files/file/Claire-Garnham-Children-Update.pdf Thanks to A for sharing this link .This is what they use for finding of fact or threshold criteria ……..

So please do not make this same fatal  mistake that I made. That will result in  no right of appeal just like me and you do not want to be like me no contact worth having. There are only about 4 cases of appeal a year anyway .It is very rare that families get an appeal.

Yes that is right, there is no criteria they make it up as they literally  go along . There is no right of appeal.

Lastly I want to apologize to all the hard working taxpayer who paid my bill for me to lose my case. It seems you need legal advice long before you pick up a phone for solicitors. There is a link to name and shame solicitors who are in the back pocket of the Local Authority.
Machins made the Luton Local Authority  job a lot easier i the first place by getting me to admit to emotional harm.

So basically you can lose your children for nothing. I was in shock as I have said before and very stressed out to find out my son had leukeamia. I was literally very vulnerable. I apologize to my older son G for not listening to him when he said get rid of Liz  Oldham he was right about her.

At the time my focus was in April 2004 – 2005 was on the contact and for those families who have been through the system this is the most important issue seeing your children. The importance of being beside my 7 year old sons  bed in hospital no matter how unfair it was to be assessed by untrained people working for the Social Services was very  very precious to me and they knew they could play on my raw emotions .I was left wide open to be abused by all and sundry. 

At times it felt just like being a caged animal in the zoo. You know what it feels like the note book twat in the corner writing down every thing you do.I do not wonder what the caged animal in the zoo feels like I have experienced  what it feels like . You basically have to over ride this phase which is called the zoo syndrome .

The small side ward they bring children through after a lumber puncture in the PDU . I felt the other eyes of mothers watching everything detail ,all the weird looking specimens they have working for  Social Workers and the weird reference is also extended to the Foster Carers what they were about to do  to us in the run up to court. It felt like my very public prosecution was taking place daily while my child was sedated and was soon to come around from the anesthetic I had to try and keep up the pretense that all would be alright if we all played the game.

What you did not know was that there was a family in there from Luton who were good friends of ours for over 30 years and they were also watching you ,watching us and the social workers. Thank you for your support and kind words of advice. I am forever in your debt.

What  the staff do not know and are so arrogant and confident about setting families up to fail is this . It is a very small world were people have known families for many years and this is a fact. It seems bizzare to then label with social problems when they have fitted in fine before there stop gap in ward C 2 and lived the child has cancer experience. So be mindful who you are labeling next time with neglect and emotional harm especially when they are well know to other families in the community.

There were days we will never forget or forgive the professionals for getting it wrong.My son was left screaming for his mother,this was after  a lumber puncture , where was I ? I was outside  the front entrance of Addenbrookes hospital on a mobile phone to Liz Oldham my solicitor or on the mobile to Dale Wood   Cafcass aka Crafty -crap the guardian asking to get me inside before the supervised contact started. I would like to ask you the general public would this be good enough for your child?

I would like to say thank you finally to all the lovely people who approached me and asked me if I was alright and offered to buy me a cup of tea on the bench outside of Addenbrookes hospital. This is why I was so upset and crying,whilst inside foster carers and social workers and Cafcass and solicitors were having a ball at our expense and yours.

I am back after a week of having much needed  time out .I

When Am I going Home ?

t was a very difficult time for me as it was the run up to the anniversary my son C was diagnosed with leukaemia 27th April 2004. Since then time,for me at least seems to  have virtually stood still and it is not a good position to be in.I am not sure about the rest of the family .On the surface we all look to be surviving the aftermath. Then who knows how we all feel as we just get through each day and hope it brings us closer to the day C walks with his feet.

If you are reading this then get your own solicitor and not Patrick Perusko as he was a shister.

I am sure if I had a clue what was needed to complain about the experts I could have got maybe this far .

I never knew just how much time off my life it would take or cause me health problems due to long term stress. Some would say  I should  have maybe cut my huge loss, and accepted that I lost ,I was also set up,and that was finally it . That was it ,but that is not IT, I happen to have a son lost in all of the cross fire .

The important thing for C is to leave some kind of probate, and contact details maybe with a hospital caseworker ,should he need to find us in an emergency situation , which is exactly what I was dealing with on Monday 26th April when I got off a plane at Luton Airport.

Is it really  now 6 years since this nightmare really began ?

I am afraid the answer is yes. I remember my Counsel said it would take 5 years . I never knew in that next 5 years it would be necessary to cover up the placement mistakes ,hide the paperwork,make sure everyone got paid well over £5,000 a report each plus more……

I am also  slightly ashamed to say am trapped in an office at a desk top having an equally  busy time as I ever was  with the GMC complaints about Dr Joan Claire Sturge & Dr Anthony Wilkins who already has a warning. The GMC go at a very slow pace with the excuse well it depends what court it is if they are busy . The request has gone in for 3rd party disclosure many months ago for the transcribes and oral evidence of experts. The court order now looks, not so scary after all.As it is all so  different now, it is not concerning myself, but these SO  experts . These confident experts are not so sure they want to consent to all the bundles coming out so a 3rd party can read them.

In one sentence why so much disruption for a sick child to have to go through? I can not see the logic to any of this ,not when the support for the family would have been more realistic an option to take. The next interesting point is, there were no prior concerns so maybe that is what lead me into a send of false hope with the courts in the first place. “I was SO WRONG TO TRUST IN THE LEGAL ADVICE”.

The HPC complaints I have had to request more time to complete with a copy of the inconclusive report for over £5,000 from Graham Flatman Psychologist. I am lost for words to sum up what I feel for professionals who were willing to do this to me ,abuse me as a client when they were working in their professional capacity. I have to say I was in shock when dealing with finding out my 7 year old son had ALL T cell and I was running around in shock with pneumonia whislt these vultures ( solicitors )were making a vast amount of money out of our misery .

Today I found this news about David Southall ,and wonder is this really worth continuing with trying to exhaust all the domestic remedies necessary for an appeal. You note the absence of legal aid lawyers to assist you when you need to get past the panel of the GMC investigations board this is not such an easy task to do either. Some parents can not read the paperwork they are so afraid of it . Would you want to have ago at explaining so much perjury set against you ,and explaining that it was nothing personal just basic greed or professionals using their power over you at time when you were vulnerable.

It is the lawyers that are responsible for making sure they select the experts and make sure you never get all of the paperwork.

The information is filtering down to families who are wising up to Coram based everything in court . My paperwork has it in bold black writing. It meant nothing at the time it is only when you see they make sure these children never come back or get any decent  contact to birth families that is only when  it finally sinks in what it has truly cost you in a closed court.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8659529.stm

I had to get a full copy of the Psych report for the HPC as I ripped into the last copy, and marked the other one up in the columns ,for what good it done me.

My advice is do not go near these court experts if they are going to set you up .It would be a lot simpler to just say ok I have lost give your ex-partner custody and walk away ,than be subjected to this abuse. Final message to my son C get all the paperwork and sue the Local Authority you children can take out a claim against them. There is dereliction of duty of care towards you . I want you to know I will continue to fight on until we get some kind of resolution.