I am not feeling the best at the moment I came down with a bug last Sunday and have to wait for the results of the stool sample. I am told to wait for 2 weeks for the diarrhoea to stop ,then investigations will start, as I have a history of Ulcerative Colitis which there is no known cure. When the solicitors got hold of my medical bundles they or somebody gave a lead to Dr Claire Sturge to tell her I was a thick file patient and would be so easy to label with hypochondria. You decide if you would want your medical notes interpreted in such a way.
Then much later on into the final hearing stage ,you will be asked to take part and go look for funding or for CBT therapy you basically do not need. I am not a liar , I have not earner £150 an hour for lying either. I refused to pay a consultation fee of £250 or £100 an hour to the same expert witness for 2 years CBT therapy as guess what, Dr Wilkins told the judge that nobody else but himself would be able to carry out this therapy !! Is that right?
In his reports for court Dr Wilkins makes a point about there being no evidence of active UC ???? Dr Wilkins takes his argument up to 1988 for the court and stops there . The court do not know this they never accessed the medical bundles the experts did .I was having a serious problem with chronic UC which was resistant to all the other previously used mainline drugs for this treatment, and I was prescribed Azathiaprine in 1992 . What, and who, more to the point are these so called experts doing operating in the Family courts? Time to expose the abuse of these psychiatrists and psychologists .
This blog will save me a lot of time ,and energy by posting the evidence, so my son C can have full medical disclosure . The other brother if asked are there any cases of bowel disease in the family he can say yes there is,however child C will say I was removed so do not know. This is why I lost my case in a closed court , because experts like theses rule these kangeroo courts. Sadly there is no known cure for corruption , just like this bowel disease which they say is genetically linked to other people in the family you just have to live with it. I never knew it was acceptable to be called a liar in closed courts for having this is when is pathology never accepted? Question for you : WHEN IS PATHOLOGY TRASHED?
Trial 4 The lighter label of MSBP
When it is a closed kangeroo court and Dr Claire Sturge is the main expert witness that is when the stupid judge listens to her evidence and not to medical facts.
What is it going to cost to have contact after school which is a 3 minute walk away from our home? It will cost Yvonne Crawford ex -social worker or Purple Professionals how much an hour ? £25 – £50 an hour……..
This comes out of local government ,just how many contact centres need to be filled, and how much a year do they make ?
Well it is only the taxpayers money and my child we are paying for with this with so it does not matter. This is about making money not child protection.
My final statement is very close at hand , for those that have seen it already the Luton Social Services have yet to say what it is I am a risk to my son of .If I have un-supervised contact. Cardolyn Hill is not even a social worker either and she is recommending that I stay long term in a contact centre to see my son.
The DO’s & Don’ts life is not long enough to contemplate those and my sanity is worth so much more and the welfare of my son is worth so much more.
I would rather no relationship with my son than supervised bullying at £25 – £50 an hour. My message to my son is you are better off playing with your friends outside than being exposed to this crap.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/death-of-the-internet-unprecedented-censorship-bill-passes-in-uk.html
This looks fun, don’t you think?
In the run up to the Ron Paul Revolution they pulled a similar trick with blocking conversation ,comments and musicians posting supporting videos for a free campaign for a virtually little man and a rank outsider who literally stole the show.
I am sure if like me you have an apple computer you can do a back up pdf and open up a new blog , swap servers and just keep on trucking if you want freedom of speech that much.
I hope Guido Fawkes will not get blocked.http://order-order.com/
As for the visitors searching ward C2 what do you make of my blog? I read all the blogs and websites of stories were families are living and battling to survive with children with leukaemia. I bet you never read anything like this blog with paperwork going up and comments from staff who committed perjury in a Kangeroo court which resulted in me losing my child and getting very little contact at all.
I bet a few doctors and nurses who took part are feeling pretty sick themselves now,never mind if these MP’s have anything to do with rushing this bill in you might just get away with being exposed by the skin of your…….
Then again you may not with many other bloggers out here all sharing or linking up. What do you say to that? Make you think twice before you try and set up another parent for a Kangeroo court again.
The Guardian recently slated the bloggers for exposing social workers and forgot to mention the expert witnesses for court. how could we forget the experts ? I would like to thank Dr Lynne Wrennall for sharing this free download however a special thank you goes out to each and everyone of the parents for being brave enough to come back and warn others about the corruption of files and evidence being put before a draconian court which is otherwise known as a kangeroo court.
http://socialcri
Dr Lynne Wrennall
Coordinator, Public Health Research Group
Criminology Programme
School of Social Science,
Liverpool John Moores University,
68 Hope Street,
Liverpool L1 9HW
L.Wrennall@ljmu.ac.uk
http://www.ljmu.ac.uk/SOC/99198.htm
minology.webs.com/
http://socialcriminology.webs.com/JSC%202.pdf
http://www.ukcolumn.org/2010/03/25/child-snatching-conference-10th-april/
I have spoken to Brian Gerrish and I can confirm that I am going to attend the conference to talk about the research on a genetic key for adopted children or children lost in the care system. So look forward to meeting you all there. 
Best Wishes
Lyndamac
Looks Innocent Enough!
The video recording is going up soon of Cafcass buckling under duress of a request for information using the DPA . The previous posts state that they have destroyed the file. They have now asked head office to sort this out.
I appreciate it must be difficult for them now they have gone to the effort of lying about this matter and will need all hands on deck from head office to sort this mess out.
Moving on to solicitors looking for that certain expert for court If I remember correctly they took ages to get a 3rd expert in after the final hearing to rule out the 2 doctors or so called expert witnesses for court ,these experts are currently are under investigation with the GMC Dr Wilkins already has 1 warning from the GMC check out the GMC website .
The Local Authority who were sharing costs for these reports they ruled out the CV for Mr Anderson psychologist . This was the first psychologist and he was rejected for the reasons of not being qualified enough I have sent both CV’s to the GMC & HPC to compare them.
Then again he probably was not a trauma expert with a conflict of interest unlike Linda Jeffes. Please check the link to finding experts to the right hand side of the blog.
Read this: “I trust you will not need Graham Flatman’s CV” all looks rather innocent until you think about it this is a fishing trip for certain experts who will fall in with what the other 2 experts say. Graham does not like to give out his working address,I found comments in the paperwork. This said, he does not think for 1 moment a client could use a computer and find the details he posts online to get himself work.
I am going to post his estimate costs when I get time to delete the child’s name out . Think it was over £5,000 for an out of date MMP1 test and an inconclusive report which was incomprehensible report at that .
Message to Mr Gordon Brown , wants to make sure that we have even faster broadband speeds http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8579333.stm
So as a direct result of this pledge ,just maybe parents will be able to “OUT ” the smoke screen & mirrors policy on social care in the UK and the rotten Labour Party Policy on Families staying together.
Cheers for that I promise you we will make good use of the speed .Thank you so much Mr Brown as we will now be able to share vital information for parents to enable them to be a bit more savvy when it comes down to the corruption and money being made from selling our children out by the ££££££££££ in a secret Family court being represented by scum bag legals working under the logo of Coram in the back pocket for the Local Authority.
In other words “FORCED ADOPTION PROFIT FOR CHILD SNATCHING ”
ALL PAID FOR BY YOU THE CLUELESS TAXPAYER!
I am going to use all of this research dates times and who done what to make it work for my family. I am going to document the case with a book. To hell with professionals and MP’s I have no gag order the lot of you are getting named and shamed for making money out of the fact that my son had cancer if it was not for my son getting cancer I would never have been made a referral to social services ,this quote is from Claire Sturge ,so sue me if you have got the bottle for it. Only thing is,this is your own bloody paperwork it is your own dirty work penned by you .
I will show the general public what kind of best interest this case was really in.
These professionals are pond life , educated scum of the earth working in secret with a pack mentally . I am so tempted to post on this blog just how they had a shopping list for an expert witness for me that took months to find whilst they rejected another expert witness. I doubt any parent could have fathomed this 1 out whilst focusing on a seriously ill child and trying to get as much contact to her child.
I am working on my own case right now and putting together the evidence and explaining to the GMC how long this took to get my copies of the paperwork to put events real facts of what really happened instead of complete hogwash supplied by expert witnesses.
http://www.youtube.com/user/liverpoollou6#p/u/33/nk0er4k3nsY
Why is it so acceptable to insult the public with shambolic facts & figures like these ? And just how long do the politicians, social services& adoption agencies think they can get away with the lies about adoption ?
Angela Wileman asked recently on “Whatdotheyknow” just how many children were being removed from parents in DV relationships for using the failure to protect and emotional harm . The reply back was evasive and insulting to the sender to say the least .Angela can you please forward the link to your questions it is in my old ibk …..
While I am at it ,please can some court clerk keep a note to find the correct figures just how many children are being either given to violent ex-partners or alternatively being twin tracked in Family courts each year when Coram solicitors are finished with a custody case for children from a previous relationship?
Here is a sample of what I mean .
I am noticing a lot of fathers getting custody using this emotional harm and mothers losing all of their rights to even have contact to their children.The only problem with this is they never just take the 1 child,the courts remove all the remaining children which belong to another father .
That can not be right, surely to punish the father of the next child for getting caught in the cross fire of a custody or contact case? This is not the first case I have heard of when current new partner ,the father who is married or living with the mother and has gone on to have more children with the mother then loses all his rights in respect of another father winning a court case. Please see the Case currently in the media the UK couple who are being named are Sam Hallimond & Vanessa Willingham who are now being named by John Hemming MP in debate and the paperwork is going up piecemeal posted on the fathers blogs and who can blame him ? This is an open e-mail being sent out .
………….Dear Mr White and Social Workers
I would like to draw your attention to my Blog once again, and refer you to comments made in The Times newspaper! What do you really mean, because you persist in contradicting yourself!
Only 2 more days, til I start publishing my case, and the recordings of the social workers, guardian and expert witnesses! I once again state that I have nothing to hide, and still protest our innocence!
I will again request that the below mentioned social workers are investigated for their illegal actions in fabricating information, maladministration, and you Mr White for allowing it to happen!
Mrs Sue Chapman – Social Worker in Sudbury.
Mrs Kate Van-De-Peer – Social Worker in Sudbury.
Mrs Sam Boyd-Lambley – Social Worker in Bury St Edmunds
Mrs Rachael Anderson – Social Worker in Bury St Edmunds.
I stand by my statement that both the social workers and guardian in our case, are corrupt. I will continue my campaign until justice is done, and not just seen to be done! I also openly challenge you to prevent my daughter, Daisy Hallimond from being Adopted by “Corporate Parents”. If you have nothing to hide then accept this, and agree to investigate our case, INDEPENDENTLY!!!
http://suffolksocialservices.wordpress.com/
–
Sam Hallimond
Mobile: (0034) 634 310778
Monday Morning, and I hit the keys before a cuppa T this morning , this week is going to be very busy for me and for other cases. I have to say Mr White in Suffolk SS looks ill last time I saw him lying on tv about children in care ……. If somebody gets time can you ring or e-mail Julia Brophy et all for the statistics and send her a link to the ITV interview.Open letter to MP & GMC Caseworker & Luton legal team Jenny Lennon ,Mr Dean Head master .
Dear All ,
To all interested parities for court please feel free to include team manager of LAC 3 Pamela Marsh Julie Tadd and especially Sharon Andrews who I find gave an order to stop contact , please also include & Cafcass officer retired Dale Wood . Please note I will use this penal warning concerning the breaking down of my contact and the behaviour of the social workers Yvonne Crawford who were so abusive to my son in Cambridge Street which the action was not called for .I made a decision to stop contact in a supervised setting. The Supervised contact has no bearing upon me receiving current monthly medical information concerning C this is what I will be dealing with for court . The risks now the child is older should he come out of remission from ALL T cell leukaemia .
When I am finished dealing with the complaints for the GMC and the decision is back in from them I will take this back to court on all contact matters for a right to leave a genetic key for C . I will give many examples of statements put before the court were the Local Authority said they would keep me updated about his medical progress and did not do this. Then the father who got custody also did not inform me about any current update of C’s health or progress, instead I am going to highlight how mr M and the Luton Local Authority and also Judge Mac Gregor covered up when Dr Sturge said it was ONLY a hiccoup when medication was not given to him. I will want more than an apology from the LA for the stress it has caused me to have a senior social worker Julie Tadd got away with lying about my son’s medical history Addenbrookes evidence going over to GMC will indicate change your attitude or we will not work with you !.
Moving on now ,more evidence with be backed up by a doctors report Dr Siva Kuma for court stating the child was well and should not be kept way from contact or treated any other way than like any other normal child.
I have leave to now return back to court on specific issues concerning this issue which is a general public interest matter when dealing with cancer patients the professionals must take care to get the data & facts right.
I trust this paperwork is based on events it is witnessed by professionals and it has been all put before a court and so far this is the ultimate result of 1 parent (DNA half is missing ) being marginalized by a trial by expert witness rules a paper written by Danya Glaser & Clare Sturge on emotional harm . If facts were checked out for court and my ex-partner’s passport details would show he was abroad for many months of the year working as an itinerant worker on the buildings.
I would like to say all of these facts were overlooked in favour of a perverse reversal of custody to a violent father .
Just to remind you that this case is being retained to Nasreen Pearce who has come out of retirement to deal with this matter I look forward to seeing you all back in court .
Yours sincerely
Linda McDermott
 |
| CHILDREN — Orders with respect to children — Contact order — Child in interim care of local authority and living with foster parents — Order to maintain contact with stepfather and half brother — Guardian not complying with order — Whether contact order enforceable by committal — Whether local authority in contempt of court if order not obeyed — Whether circuit judge needing to assume powers of High Court judge — Whether jurisdiction to attach penal notice to order — Children Act 1989, s 34 — Family Proceedings Rules 1991, r 4.21A (as substituted by Family Proceedings (Amendment) (No 5) Rules, r 88) — CPR, Sch 2, CCR Ord 29, r 1
In re B (Minors) (Contact Order: Enforcement); [2009] WLR (D) 73
CA: Thorpe, Wall and Moore-Bick LJJ: 27 February 2009
A contact order made under s 34 of the Children Act 1989 in the county court was enforceable by committal for contempt of court, and the court had jurisdiction to attach to a penal notice directed to the local authority in whose care the relevant child was.
The Court of Appeal so held when allowing an appeal by the local authority against the decision of Judge Nasreen Pearce, sitting in the Luton County Court on 16 and 23 October 2008, to attach to a contact order made in public law proceedings under s 34 of the Children Act 1989 a penal notice addressed to the local authority stating that, if the order were not obeyed, the local authority would be in contempt of court and the officer responsible for the implementation of the order might be sent to prison. The order required that contact be maintained between a child, who was in the interim care of the local authority and living with foster parents, and her stepfather and half brother.
WALL LJ, giving the judgment of the court, said that the judge had the power to enforce by committal the order for contact. R 4.21A of the Family Proceedings Rules 1991, which was concerned with committal for the breach of an order and was directed to private law proceedings, was not exhaustive, but since on its face it was not expressed to apply to orders under s 34 of the 1989 Act, CPR, Sch 2, CCR Ord 29 r 1 was available to fill the gap. It followed that if the court had power to enforce its order by committal, it also had the power to attach to the order a penal notice. It was neither necessary nor appropriate for the circuit judge to assume the powers of a High Court judge under s 9 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 in order to attach a penal notice to a contact order. Since the contact order was now being obeyed the penal notice would be struck out with immediate effect. Accordingly the appeal was dismissed on the question of jurisdiction, but allowed in relation to the continuation of the penal notice. |
Appearances: Dermot Main Thompson for the local authority; Marcia Hyde, for the guardian, and Daniel Kingsley, for the stepfather, did not appear but provided position statements in writing of their representative positions. |
Reported by: Ben Urdang, barrister.
|
|
| Subscribe now for full text reports |
Brought to you as part of The Daily Law Notes service by the reporters to The Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales, in association with JustCite who provide the cross-reference links.
 |
I have sent this e-mail and for most of you with children in foster care fighting for contact in the Family courts take the LA back to court using this case law.
I am not feeling the best at the moment I came down with a bug last Sunday and have to wait for the results of the stool sample. I am told to wait for 2 weeks for the diarrhoea to stop ,then investigations will start, as I have a history of Ulcerative Colitis which there is no known cure. When the solicitors got hold of my medical bundles they or somebody gave a lead to Dr Claire Sturge to tell her I was a thick file patient and would be so easy to label with hypochondria. You decide if you would want your medical notes interpreted in such a way.
