Lynda Mac

Monday Morning, and I hit the keys before a cuppa T this morning , this week is going to be very busy for me and for other cases. I have to say Mr White in Suffolk SS looks ill last time I saw him lying on tv about children in care …….  If somebody gets time can you ring or e-mail Julia Brophy et all for the  statistics and send her a link to the ITV interview.Open letter to MP & GMC Caseworker & Luton  legal team Jenny Lennon ,Mr Dean Head master  .

Dear All ,

To all interested parities for court please feel free to include team manager of LAC 3   Pamela Marsh  Julie Tadd and especially Sharon Andrews who I find gave an order to stop contact , please also include & Cafcass  officer retired Dale Wood . Please note I will use this penal warning concerning the breaking down of my contact and the behaviour of the social workers  Yvonne Crawford  who  were so  abusive to my son in Cambridge Street which the action was not called for .I made a decision to stop contact  in a supervised setting. The Supervised contact has no bearing upon me receiving current monthly medical information concerning C this is what I will be dealing with for court . The risks now the child is older should he come out of remission from ALL T cell leukaemia .

When I am finished dealing with the complaints for the GMC and the decision is back in from them I will take this back to court on all contact matters for a right to leave a genetic key  for C . I will give many examples of statements put before the court were  the Local Authority said they would keep me updated about his medical progress and did not do this. Then the father who got custody also did not inform me about any current update of C’s health or progress, instead I am going to highlight how mr M and the Luton Local Authority and also Judge Mac Gregor  covered up when Dr Sturge said it was ONLY  a hiccoup when medication was not given to him. I will want more than an apology from the LA for the stress it has caused me to have a senior social worker Julie Tadd got away  with lying about my son’s medical history  Addenbrookes evidence going over to GMC will indicate change your attitude or we will not work with you !.

Moving on now ,more  evidence with be backed up by a doctors report  Dr Siva Kuma for court stating the child was well and should not be kept way from contact or treated any other way than like any other normal child.

I have leave to now return back to court  on specific issues concerning this issue which is a general public interest matter when dealing with cancer patients the professionals must take care to get the data & facts right.

I trust this paperwork is based on events it is witnessed by professionals and it has been all put before a court and so far this is the ultimate  result  of 1 parent (DNA half is missing ) being marginalized by a trial by expert witness rules  a paper written by Danya Glaser & Clare Sturge on emotional harm . If facts were checked out for court and my ex-partner’s passport details would show he was abroad for many months of the year working as an itinerant worker on the buildings.

I would like to say all of these facts were overlooked  in favour of a perverse reversal of custody to a violent father .

Just to remind you that this  case is being retained to Nasreen Pearce who has come out of retirement to deal with this matter I look forward to seeing you all back in court .

Yours sincerely

Linda McDermott

CHILDREN — Orders with respect to children — Contact order — Child in interim care of local authority and living with foster parents — Order to maintain contact with stepfather and half brother — Guardian not complying with order — Whether contact order enforceable by committal — Whether local authority in contempt of court if order not obeyed — Whether circuit judge needing to assume powers of High Court judge — Whether jurisdiction to attach penal notice to order — Children Act 1989, s 34 — Family Proceedings Rules 1991, r 4.21A (as substituted by Family Proceedings (Amendment) (No 5) Rules, r 88) — CPR, Sch 2, CCR Ord 29, r 1 In re B (Minors) (Contact Order: Enforcement); [2009] WLR (D) 73 CA: Thorpe, Wall and Moore-Bick LJJ: 27 February 2009 A contact order made under s 34 of the Children Act 1989 in the county court was enforceable by committal for contempt of court, and the court had jurisdiction to attach to a penal notice directed to the local authority in whose care the relevant child was. The Court of Appeal so held when allowing an appeal by the local authority against the decision of Judge Nasreen Pearce, sitting in the Luton County Court on 16 and 23 October 2008, to attach to a contact order made in public law proceedings under s 34 of the Children Act 1989 a penal notice addressed to the local authority stating that, if the order were not obeyed, the local authority would be in contempt of court and the officer responsible for the implementation of the order might be sent to prison. The order required that contact be maintained between a child, who was in the interim care of the local authority and living with foster parents, and her stepfather and half brother. WALL LJ, giving the judgment of the court, said that the judge had the power to enforce by committal the order for contact. R 4.21A of the Family Proceedings Rules 1991, which was concerned with committal for the breach of an order and was directed to private law proceedings, was not exhaustive, but since on its face it was not expressed to apply to orders under s 34 of the 1989 Act, CPR, Sch 2, CCR Ord 29 r 1 was available to fill the gap. It followed that if the court had power to enforce its order by committal, it also had the power to attach to the order a penal notice. It was neither necessary nor appropriate for the circuit judge to assume the powers of a High Court judge under s 9 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 in order to attach a penal notice to a contact order. Since the contact order was now being obeyed the penal notice would be struck out with immediate effect. Accordingly the appeal was dismissed on the question of jurisdiction, but allowed in relation to the continuation of the penal notice.

Appearances: Dermot Main Thompson for the local authority; Marcia Hyde, for the guardian, and Daniel Kingsley, for the stepfather, did not appear but provided position statements in writing of their representative positions.

Reported by: Ben Urdang, barrister.

Subscribe now for full text reports

Brought to you as part of The Daily Law Notes service by the reporters to The Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales, in association with JustCite who provide the cross-reference links.

I have sent this e-mail and for most of you with children in foster care fighting for contact in the Family courts take the LA back to court using this case law.

This firm of solicitors Borneo Linnells who were said to represent my son,what an evil bed fellow Patrick Persusko was when he knowingly  he got into bed with the Social Services ,most important of all please take on board that both interested parties for court   never considered that should my son come out of remission from leukaemia in the future then  contact would be an serious matter or issue  when needing to finding a donor.

The arrogance of these professionals they just done what they know works in court and they done the exact same to us as they do to all families tear you apart, and make sure the contact breaks down  . They never once considered my son had cancer or any other options for his future .

They destroyed  another family whole so that a Non Resident Father could have a relationship with his son. FULL STOP !

The LG  Dale Wood Cafcass officer for court for the child must have done a runner with the file because they will not give it to me .

Would you take a look at these Cafcass Jokers !! They kept the file for private law case in 1999 as this was pulled for court and used in evidence in 2004- 2006.

This said, it was also around this time August 2004 that the expert Dr Sturge  and child’s solicitor Patrick Persusko were labelling me or hinting at the drop down list of things the expert specialized in shall we say.

Dr Sturges name is coming up a lot now in other cases with mothers telling me she is brought in for the final hearing.  Bearing in mind  this expert is so big that she is arrogant to send this fax in the first place .This is  SO leading and it is blatant labelling WITH INTENT !

Fact Finding the problem has to exist first it has to be there in the paperwork , not created for court fact finding which is our experience of closed court  .So let us look again at that fax below The doctor Dr Sturge  has  not read all the bundles, or met me either, the date on the fax and the appointment for meeting them is much later on but she is clearly stating what she is interested in looking at abnormal illness. My child has cancer and she has nothing on me ,I am being done under the criteria for emotional harm only at this stage but it will have to be doubled up to neglect so this 1 shoe will have to fit me too.

After Patrick Persusko (PP isnow a judge in MK) helped Dr Struge to find evidence which were comments left on file historic data that had been left dormant which had no bearing upon my ability to parent or give a good standard of care to my son .

The outcome was damning in so much they used of this historic data, which had no real bearing ,or concern at all about me ,but never the less was used for court to label me with the lighter label of MSBP. Finally all experts had to agree with this ,they said it was abnormal illness behaviour .

When in fact I think they seriously let my son down.The corporate parent& courts alike   should have concentrated on genetics ,and also the long term welfare interests of child C. Surely good old common sense should tell you that if nothing else.

Any decent parent would want to do their best ,or anything to improve matters or put something in for your child,no matter what that was.

Tell me this please do you see anyone representing adopted children to find a genetic key ?I do not see many adopted children being represented in law to find a genetic key.

The corporate parent has not bothered, and the blood parent is too stunned, or far to scared to do anything at all before the final hearing get it in the paperwork  make the solicitors work for their money . I know solicitor drain every ounce of energy out of you,please  do not accept the what is this genetic key they know what it is  ………

This looks to me like serious intent to label me what do you think? and not only that can you see how they are willing to help each too? Frightening to think this pack is waiting with a confident smile on their face for another unsuspecting family to fall into the machine . confident that they will win and you will lose your child .

This paperwork was all contributed to this blog by Coram & Cafcass and you the taxpayer paid for all of this case to the sum of £150 K or more.

These jokers that pass for professionals  better tell me they looked at the long term interests of my son . It is not asking too much that he gets the same chances that other children get when they have access to all of their blood family .

.http://www.waterlowlegal.com/directories/borneo-linnells-solicitors-1403279.ph

Social workers be mindful parents are blogging too. Some like myself  have even gone to the trouble of getting a website hosted in another country. Years ago parents dare not even read the lies that social workers wrote about their families in the paperwork . Now times have changed and we give lessons how to create bundles for court so these children can sue the Local Authority.

How do you think that social worker looks now .Julie Tadd wrote my son was not responding to treatment in 2005. What kind of message it that giving the general public now? My blog statistics were up and 30 + searches were for Julie Tadd  alone. The use of the blogs and the information is filtering down so fast to service users are becoming more informed about who exactly are these individuals working for social services and what are they really up to in child protection?

http://www.communitycare.co.uk/carespace/forums/a-childs-right-to-take-legal-action-what-is-the-6709.aspxAs I’ve recently blogged, much legal work in the UK has been done to promote the right to a child or young person to have their voices heard, from accepting the demands of the UN’s Convention on the Rights of the Child to the implementation of the Local Authority Social Services Department Children’s Representation Procedure [England] Regulations, which required local authorities to feed information on advocacy to young people, as well as explaining the important issues around representation and the complaints procedure.

Recent calls for children to be given the right to take legal action on a council that performs badly have sparked wild debate. Normal 0 false false false EN-GB X-NONE X-NONE Ian Johnston, former chief executive of the British Association of Social Workers, contributed to that debate by saying “here care falls below acceptable standards the children concerned should be entitled to seek redress and the process to secure compensation must be accessible and user friendly.”

Is this the general consensus among those who work in social work?

Do You ever ask yourself WHY  you  TRUSTED  and signed the working agreement document with Social Services?

I trusted the Social Services ,solicitors and courts to be honest . So I completely opened the door to my home and worked with the social workers in good faith,that was in April 2004 – February 2005   the early days, simply because that was the kind of person I was , that person has  I am glad to say died a shocking death in 2006 and paid a hefty price for making this mistake.

Since then I have moved on to 2009 and I said I will not work with Social Services or courts even if that means I will get back my child,and this said I will not take this back that is how strong I feel ,and who can blame me for  taking  a much more  cynical  attitude , also  a hardline approach is very much needed when working with these  professionals. I would doubt a solicitor  or a social worker would dare try it on with me again .

So by the time they finished stitching me up in a closed court , the working relationship if that was the title you could give to it  was anything but that, working with us  was a very difficult experience quoted Dale Wood Cafcass legal guardian to my son.

It would be unfair, to say that I had a good working arrangement with this social worker for a lot of reasons, the biggest reason was she personalized the case from the start, and she also had a very deformed and twisted mind. I found her child like , and very petty and very scruffy to be seen out with in the community I hated the stares people would look at her  trailing around 3 paces behind us  ……….

She would  ideally want to be in my house early in the morning , saying “I am outside your door”, tough I am on the bus in 3 roads up from where you are parked up or watching her do her 15 minutes work out in the  same gym I was going to . I refused to speak to her in the end , hung up on her ,would not go in a room with her at Unity House the more you talked the more they lied about what you said, she even tried to get an injunction out against me saying hello to her in the changing rooms of the gym. She never succeeded ,as the judge said it would scare my son to know I was in prison.

She told Judge Mac Gregor she was scared of me ,and wanted an injunction, she had good reason to be scared she knew I was on to her and she was a liar. Julie Tadd knew her game was up ,as much as she tried to wind up me or my eldest son we laughed at her  for it. At the final hearing she waited for the drama of screaming match to start and again she never got it ,so  when she and her side kick Sharon Andrews expected me to fall to bits, or collapse I retreated and went on holiday ,if the professionals went on holiday I went on holiday . I did say in court to her I could kiss you ,you know ,as I thank her  for doing everything you have done. I now have a much better life than you…. .Her face was a picture when I said this , this process is all about destroying a persons world . I will never forget her face when I said this to her, she let it slip the face was gutted, she turns around in Debenham’s to get a good look at me when she sees me in town. I let her as she can look take a good look at all the hours wasted and thousands of taxpayers money on the mother who never went down for nothing at all.

The working agreement was never signed again , the expert was never trusted either , if she asked to see me again which she did after the final hearing was over , I took my  solicitor with me.I learned to suss people  out in my environment very quickly,also what they wanted from me or wanted me to do next . I questioned the cost of it all and how much it was bankrupting me to continue with working with the courts for so long .

If I was to survive the court experience I needed to function on the same level as them without emotion I soon got sick of being played my friend said they are so predictable.

It has sadly left me with no respect for professionals ,and I  will never completely   trust anyone again after this ,and who can blame me for this I have been abused by all and sundry .I would also have to say that this,  the whole CLOSED  court experience  has hardened me up,much more than I ever expected I would dare to admit too. I got asked a few weeks ago by a doctor if I was a social worker and I can talk like I have no child  without the emotion . So think again if you are heading to the Family courts trust no one. As these respectable professionals  can and will  use you,simply  just because they can get away with it in a secret court.

I was probably no different than the next person to trust a professional . The general public put their  trust in the multi-agency groups and expect them to be honest,and do their job.

It was our experience that they were anything but honest or even cared about the children in their line of duty.

The foster carer was not much different it was for her all about the money. I got the odd homemade card or present a few sweets that are in a box with so many kisses and I love you Mum on the paperwork just does not add up. The foster carer said that my son never asked about me or asked when he would see me next.Then again it is very good money for a special needs child some say £500 a week all in plus petrol so you work out if it pays to tell the truth especially if you have a child who is sick and can not fight back .

What must the children think about their parents , little do they know they have had contact stopped for no reason whilst they settle 3 months nothing not a phone call, or your Easter egg is sitting on the social workers desk for 3 months until it had gone green moldy.

Or how they stop the mothers contact and force a child to go see dad whether  they have expressly wished not to go does not matter.The expert witness says she has specific wishes how this must be done.

Someone said to me it is amazing how long they will keep this up covering up the lies the perjury an most of all protecting the professionals who write this stuff for court.

If somebody else is reading this did you have this social worker Julie Tadd? and did you get nowhere with your complaints . Please can somebody tell me if they know if she also came out of the systems care pool ? Was she put in care as a child? This could explain a lot and why she was off work for 1 year after taking a beautiful child out of the care pool.

I did ask Kelvin Hopkins can he find out how many social workers in Luton take away children and go on maternity leave for 1 year ? I also want to know do they put the children back in the pool and start again when they have to go missing for a long time when they are the centre of a dodgy case like ours was .

I tell you this If I want to go off seeking attention it would not be by being sick.

This is Sharon Andrews in the photograph  below she is not a fully qualified social worker she is a family aid worker a mother and a foster carer working for Luton social services. She has no qualifications or training to identify a Munchausen’s mother =Munchausen syndrome by proxy yet , she was expected to find evidence for Dr Claire Sturge.

You may remember seeing her and a 2 more individuals at Addenbrookes hospital  especially after my son had a lumber puncture done in the recovery ward?

Yes that is right we were also  1 of the many families who were subjected to being investigated by social services after a referral made Dr Amos Burke. I know we were not the only family to be referred to in 2004 because other families talked about other families losing their children frequently in the coffee room for neglect they said.

Going back to the events or summary of the case . I was the mother who got ill with pneumonia on the ward and made to wear a face mask . The family aid first wrote in her hand held notes ,the very first notes evidence is in  my medical notes. I told her that I was missing urgent appointments as the consultant not me thought a mass on a lobe which was found in an X-ray which was presenting as a normal infection, but needed further investigations to see if it was malignant.

This Family aid worker gave 1 of the first leads for an expert  Dr Wilkins & Dr Sturge and all the other multi-agency groups to pick up and run with a Muncheasn mother.It had to come from someone as she was the first person I met when I was called into the office it was her.

I was expected to fail core assessments from the start as they wrote and discussed us in a very stressful environment in hospital. I was later to observe how they tried and failed to set me up by not letting me know when my son was to attend out patients hospital at the L&D .This took place before an up and coming LP …..

The foster carer said the cough my son had was not a problem at all. My ex-partner wrote in statements he never saw our son have an asthma attack. The Foster carer never used the inhalers. The consultant said prednisolne steroids would cover this and to stop the preventatives as it could  delay growth. Then the foster care Grace Human sneaked up to Addenbrookes hospital for the LP and I just got there in time to see her get out the inhalers from her bag. So they had a discussion with doctors to make it look like I diagnosed the asthma ,then they could not take the risk of him going under the anesthetic without using them.

The paperwork never adds up so this is just another dirty trick used by all of them to set you up for a Munch Bunch Mother.

I only got to the hospital on time simply because I left the house before 07:00am and got through London , they never offered me a lift to hospital  or the money or even a travel warrant I paid or paid a fine . The working agreement to work with Social Services should read like this .Set up to fail from the start.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jan/25/mother-munchausen-syndrome-by-proxy

You simply could not write this, a few weeks earlier I was sitting in Kangeroo court( First Avenue House Principle Registry )  being set up for a Munch Bunch mother in February 2005 final hearing  the next minute  I was on holiday in  the Dominican Republic.

I would like to see  the  faces of the nurses & doctors in ward C2 to see this , especially after all the false allegations an bent reports for court .So whilst you were all busy gossiping about the case and everything else you might of  missed this and probably preparing for another mug who would fall into the same trap again . I was having lunch in the Dominican Republic  with a social worker and a Business Development  Executive from Cambridge who knew  the consultant Amos Burke from ward C2  Addenbrookes the doctor responsible for putting my son in care.

Now what a shame all of  that team effort gone to waste ,thousands of taxpayers money wasted on destroying us as a family in a secret court . So what did I do ? What the professionals do switch off and go  on a holiday….. what else was I supposed to do ? When I came back I started to do the form on the Fassit Forum this is a website for families who were asking so many questions about social services and courts.

I remember my barrister pumping me for information in Chez Garrard restaurant after court , the Local Authority  barrister  & child’s solicitor Patrick Perusko wants to know were the money is coming from?

We both looked at her ,my son G just looked at her when she asked this.  . She was pumping  us for the opposition………

This was the only holiday I never had to come racing back from a wedding in Ireland over a weekend   or a social function and pay an extra £200 to  catch a flight back ,to be in time for contact for supervised contact in a dump in Luton in  Family Centre in Mayne Avenue, or Purple Professionals Dunstable for a couple of hours to see my son . What right has anyone got to cause this amount of disruption to any family or burden them with the financial costs.

I decided I would not go any more to contact, or to  be assessed or humiliated or lied about any more ,for this I believe  am highly criticized by the courts and probably some families too.

This is  certainly not about children or child protection it is all about making money and never letting children come home again let us face facts what budget do you have left to keep up the court momentum?

Surely the best thing to do until you get to meet your children again is to live your life like normal people do if you can that . Nothing will ever be the same again for most of the families as this is set up to drain everything from you .

I consider I have paid enough , I have lost far to much and I am not paying any more.

This is us in Addenbrookes hospital 29th June 2004 , my oldest son G was very supportive he knew exactly what the game plan was with the staff setting me up from anything to MSBP – NAI  at one stage the called for a photographer an got consent from the Luton LA to take photographs of C they put him up on a table and clicked away.

I  had asked for copies of the photographs I recorded calls they deny taking photographs and then Dr Burrows got his secretary to tell me over the phone he never met my son C. I have evidence how come it is in the child’s medical notes?
Can somebody tell me why they would lie and say I harmed my son ?

Why does this have to be  done in confidential and  secret meetings, is it so they can cover up their mistakes? It is never neglect when the Authorities make a decision to wreck a family and then cover up the problems when they have been warned .

Coming back to the final hearing in February 2005 the court heard a police forensic which is worst as he is forensic, he said  in his oral evidence this is Dr Wilkins he said “35 year old women like her have nothing better to do than sit in a doctors with nothing wrong with them!”

I am note 45 years old he has taken 10 years off me . I have a  serious history of auto-immune problems and various other medical problems except in closed court both doctors are doing their level best to convince the judge I had none of it!

In 2009  the recent  court order  Dr Wilkins is not happy to be hearing he is up before the GMC with more  complaints about him , according to the website he is now up for a 2nd time.

Dr Wilkins is not happy either for the 3rd party of disclosure to others not party to the court proceedings tough as it is coming out .

Social Worker on Holiday

I was told to take a break from court after I lost, the clock said “nice day on it” just underneath the number 6  as I looked at the logo on the face of it ,this was back in February 2005  in First Avenue House Holborn court. I had  heard enough from Judge MacGregor   she got my date of birth wrong , she said you in your life time will never be able to look after your son.

I took one look to the left my ex-partner was sitting there, I tried never to look at him at all throughout the whole of the proceedings.

Now I winked at him said “see you,I  am off”.

The barrister  (who also set me up ) Sheila Philiboise .I blew her a silent kiss  she worded thank you and I read her mouth “wait”.

I did not I wait  picked up my Next coat an designer handbag , my friend said drop the bag as you will get done by these legal vultures. I then took other advice  from friends and other professionals . I walked away,they all said the same I was being set up.

This is a social worker from up north a Geordie  said her name was Lyn, what is it about me and social workers , I can not get rid of them at all no matter how I try to  . They stopped my contact for 3 months , Dr Sturge wanted to know why I never returned the very next day after this was up? I thought she was the expert she has all the answers!

Today is another fantastic day , Happy Birthday to you .It is my sons 13th birthday today. Just so sorry we can not celebrate the occasion together, however it is a fantastic day as our son has reached 13 years  . I am glad that you have made it through another year. Long may you stay in remission we love and miss you so much.

It is such a travesty to see the best that courts and social services could do is to literally destroy your world and force you against your wishes to live somewhere were you had not expressed to be. So many children are suppose to have a voice , this is not as true as people who represent children for court like Cafcass put money before a child.

Never give up,please  keep going until we can be together again.We all  love and miss you loads.

Mum xx

I am asking for e-mails next  week only an I will try to catch up. There will be  no phone calls  returned as usual or sykpe video conferences being arranged so look for someone else to stand in . That is the message this week, from yours truly. I am working on 1 case which is connected to my own case another complaint about the same doctor all it takes is for 1 person to stand up first then others follow their lead an this is what is happening now the internet is linking up so many cases as families now try an support each other.

After Tuesday  I am back on to my GMC complaints an those of the 1st  solicitor who was on  our case.It now seems that all this research an social networking  is finally paying off now.For far too long these legals & courts have had the upper hand over very  naive an trusting parents.So for those of you who have any fight left in you or have the emotional intelligence to under take a mammoth task as this,and have had  no previous experience for this kind of work do not under estimate what it is you can have for free an how much effort you will have to put in yourself . For a start off ,you will first need an appetite of a drug sniffing dog on a mission for clues an paperwork an need to be an avid reader of paperwork which is based on hearsay, there has been nothing  evidenced as finding of fact . You will  also need the ability to fact find true facts, such as, pathology when dealing with child abuse or medical cases and drive these facts home when you get a chance to get back into court.

So do not come near me ,until you are at this stage. Anyone who is reading this an has not experienced the closed Family courts will think that this is mental. Trying to take on professionals. This is do able as the professionals have left loads of mistakes an a paper trail so what if you lost 1 court case, you can win another with the evidence .It may appear to be sheer madness to undertake all of the complaints system , but it does have to be done. You are not on your own you are among thousands of families dealing with the corruption it is all about the ££ nothing else an pitting parents against each other in contact issues.

That’s the message from Lyndamac an no media or journalist this week to contact me either no time wasters ,”as you lot are far to slow”to pick up . The media need to understand this, the use of technology the files are being shared using the Clayton ruling an Jack Straw do not attempt to reverse this, as my previous offer still stands .You can take me first for breaching this.

We are also studying the behaviour of experts for court  an also  comparing so many  other cases .There are many like minded parents like us who are willing to help other parents fight back,against a system you can not win with a solicitor most of which are in the back pocket of the Local Authority . Some of these parents are not afraid  to embrace the truth about it ,you can not win in closed court ,after trial by expert witness it is necessary however  to now be able  document the evidence surrounding the cases .

For those of you who will be in the early stages of your case I have every sympathy for you and your loss ,I have been there an now am somewhere else. My advice is do not hover in the pain lounge longer than 19 days as then you run out of time to appeal adoption cases. We will refer to this as : being in the waiting lounge areaand sadly some parents get stuck there with a bottle and never get out .

For those of you  who will be waiting to explore ,or ask questions an are still in a state of  shell shock post court , an in need of looking for help I wish you the best of luck to find coping skills to survive an do the paperwork the solicitors selected for court to legally remove your child. Try Justice For Families an watch out for sharks too trawling the forums.

Hard  to know what to say really ,in simple terms this looks like just a clean up operation now for others to sort out the mess left behind  really. This was my first time as  litigant in person an I wish I had gone an done it from the start  instead of carrying  a dead weight of vultures back and forth to court an getting paid to make sure I never got all the paperwork .

Tell you what really interest me though.An this was a surprise to me as I  had previously asked this firm of solicitors to represent me. They said they never done family only  criminal cases. Let me explain I had a bit of an incident with a woman  many years ago , a neighbour dispute which had got out of hand. The neighbour got me arrested as I was rather good at self defense tactics when things deteriorated. We both got off with a caution but she insisted it was something else.

So I find Smith Brown & Sprawson this firm of well known solicitors who were on this case , and yes before you ask I  can recommend them to you if it is criminal , as they come out to the cells within 20 minutes lol. So you are not left waiting that long, an if you wear channel N0 5 Coco  Mademoiselle you can pull your jumper  quickly up over your nose, until he gets there  an not even smell the urine in the cell,you  even can pass on the offer of a McDonalds meal , an  skip the readers digest to read too.

Going back to the  non disclosure of  paperwork problem I had,   to recently deal with from Machins which was  in 2005, I came across  fax.The fax  was to reveal contents  of them discussing me .The fax had the firms DX  number on it , it was sent from Sprawsons. So I double checked I got it right then worked out the rest for myself.At first  I had to look at it again ,thinking what is that. Is it a mistake, no they leave a big fat paper trail an they sweat an make sure you can not get this to go LIP and work your own case .So when the penny finally drops with you  what the game plan is  you will find just how deep this runs ?I only found a DX number of them discussing what expert to go get for me.

Now then what does that say about the out come of your case? Trial by expert witness.

When I tell you the LA   got big gun lawyers for me,my solicitor  set me up too as  they matched it with the experts as well  with eminent Dr Claire Sturge  an Dr Wilkins  the other 1 is not worthy of a mention as he is a pussy operating out of a PO BOX number.

If this does not tell you they are all in on it as  Family  Law solicitors then I do not know what else I can tell you it stinks to the very core  . The firms of solicitors are all in on it, just like a pack of sheep in wolves clothing out for the kill. It goes like this are you finished with that expert when your finished can I have that 1 for this client ? Oh an by the way you know when you represented them give us a clue how will they stand up to ………………..

Well you will  all be  wanting to know what happened yesterday , the GMC  did not have the bundles or so she said  just could not be bothered to read or do it .I pushed my set  to her across the desk as I had read them early hours the night before an beleive there is not a lot to them a list of reports transcripts letters of instruction  my short statement about complaint .The judge wants 1 person in the GMC to make sure that the ID of the child and experts is anon . The name I said was changed over of the child so he does not go by my name as you all know me as Lyndamac . I have kept the ID ANON rules to the book.

I got asked who done this changed the name , again if you read the bundles the previous judge must have done it obviously or some woman they let in for the day as mickey mouse must of  done it. I got told not a problem that he would soon change that back…………………..

Watch this space as they agree now what can be pulled from Kangeroo court as evidence of corruption or what can not be pulled from the archives of Kangeroo court .You just can not win can you ?

For the last few days I have been a thorn in the backside of a few people an will not back down when looking for the data kept on files kept on a database about us.Many families will be peacefully getting on with their lives thinking so what .Some of you will be interested enough to take on board what is done with this information for private court cases held behind closed doors of the Family courts . This is for complaints about solicitors  http://www.legalcomplaints.org.uk/home.page

The timescale is 3 months get it in if they lose your case they have to pay you compensation for losing your case.I am 4 years out of time , and not enough hours in the day to complain about my experience dealing with solicitors.I went to pay 10p a sheet for copies of paperwork I needed. I called in to Machins in  Victoria Street Lutonan what did I find? I have certainly not had copies of  all the letters of instruction to the expert witnesses for court.I have not more important got copies of a placement meeting either ,if you read the contents of this then you will see why the earlier post of Caffcass have said they have destroyed the file. When you cross reference these 1 contradicts the wishes & feelings of the child altogether an the only 1 being heard is the same sex foster carer on  a hefty wage of £500 for a special needs child.

I have to keep this post short now as I have to get ready for court, a solicitor is putting in a request for an application for a 3rd party disclosure for transcribes from the court as the experts oral evidence is just bizare as the reports an the costs they charged for writing them. £5,598 for an inconclusive report done by a psychologist who is shy about giving out his address.So works from a POBOX number. This kind of tells me what kind of personality disorder he has, andwhat a generous personality trusting taxpayers have who are willing to pay for this kind of thing to go on in secret .Just so you know that  the psychologist has had it off with your taxpayers money for incomplete work done for court . Time to get a jury into the closed courts if not to save children from forced adoption at least in a recession save us from this debt.

There is a list of interested parties the GMC listed  for court and guess what? There is now 1 of them who is not  happy about the bundles being put in to court an the request for complaints to be dealt with as a matter of public interest.

Do not mind me being set up, or being given the run around by  not  being given a chance to get hold of files or data for years now. I ask you how the hell are you expected to be able to raise complaints or give a concise report of my own of what I say is wrong with the experts. Note the solicitors leave you to get on with this as they will not help with this matter of complaint. So now it seems the expert is stonewalling all the way .The judge  who retained the case is not available  either .I can not see what is in the list that is the doctor is worried about and will not  agree the bundles.So lets see if another judge will hear it.It is listed for today 30 mins an am not sure if it will be dismissed all because the man from  Lisson Grove says NO !!!.