Lynda Mac

Why is it  so acceptable to insult the public with shambolic   facts & figures like these ? And just how long do the politicians, social services& adoption agencies think they can get away with the lies about adoption ?

Angela Wileman asked recently on “Whatdotheyknow” just how many children were being removed from parents in DV relationships for  using the failure to protect and emotional harm .  The reply back was evasive and insulting to the sender to say the least .Angela can you please forward the link to your questions it is in my old ibk …..

While I am at it ,please can some court clerk keep a note to find the correct figures just how many children are being either given to violent ex-partners or alternatively being twin tracked in Family courts each year when Coram solicitors are finished with a custody case for children from a previous relationship?

Here is a sample of what I mean .

I am noticing a lot of fathers getting custody using this emotional harm and mothers losing all of their rights to even have contact to their children.The only problem with this is they never just take the 1 child,the courts  remove all the remaining children which belong to another father .

That can not be right, surely  to punish  the father of the next child for  getting caught in the cross fire of a custody or contact case? This is not the first case I have heard of when current new partner ,the  father who is married or living with the mother and has gone on to have more children with the mother then loses all his rights in respect of another father winning a court case. Please see the Case currently in the media the UK couple who are being named are  Sam Hallimond & Vanessa Willingham who are now being named by John Hemming MP in debate and the paperwork is going up piecemeal  posted on the fathers blogs and who can blame him ? This is an open e-mail being sent out .

………….Dear Mr White and Social Workers

I would like to draw your attention to my Blog once again, and refer you to comments made in The Times newspaper! What do you really mean, because you persist in contradicting yourself!

Only 2 more days, til I start publishing my case, and the recordings of the social workers, guardian and expert witnesses! I once again state that I have nothing to hide, and still protest our innocence!
I will again request that the below mentioned social workers are investigated for their illegal actions in fabricating information, maladministration, and you Mr White for allowing it to happen!

Mrs Sue Chapman – Social Worker in Sudbury.
Mrs Kate Van-De-Peer – Social Worker in Sudbury.
Mrs Sam Boyd-Lambley – Social Worker in Bury St Edmunds
Mrs Rachael Anderson – Social Worker in Bury St Edmunds.

I stand by my statement that both the social workers and guardian in our case, are corrupt. I will continue my campaign until justice is done, and not just seen to be done! I also openly challenge you to prevent my daughter, Daisy Hallimond from being Adopted by “Corporate Parents”. If you have nothing to hide then accept this, and agree to investigate our case, INDEPENDENTLY!!!

http://suffolksocialservices.wordpress.com/
–
Sam Hallimond
Mobile: (0034) 634 310778

Monday Morning, and I hit the keys before a cuppa T this morning , this week is going to be very busy for me and for other cases. I have to say Mr White in Suffolk SS looks ill last time I saw him lying on tv about children in care …….  If somebody gets time can you ring or e-mail Julia Brophy et all for the  statistics and send her a link to the ITV interview.Open letter to MP & GMC Caseworker & Luton  legal team Jenny Lennon ,Mr Dean Head master  .

Dear All ,

To all interested parities for court please feel free to include team manager of LAC 3   Pamela Marsh  Julie Tadd and especially Sharon Andrews who I find gave an order to stop contact , please also include & Cafcass  officer retired Dale Wood . Please note I will use this penal warning concerning the breaking down of my contact and the behaviour of the social workers  Yvonne Crawford  who  were so  abusive to my son in Cambridge Street which the action was not called for .I made a decision to stop contact  in a supervised setting. The Supervised contact has no bearing upon me receiving current monthly medical information concerning C this is what I will be dealing with for court . The risks now the child is older should he come out of remission from ALL T cell leukaemia .

When I am finished dealing with the complaints for the GMC and the decision is back in from them I will take this back to court on all contact matters for a right to leave a genetic key  for C . I will give many examples of statements put before the court were  the Local Authority said they would keep me updated about his medical progress and did not do this. Then the father who got custody also did not inform me about any current update of C’s health or progress, instead I am going to highlight how mr M and the Luton Local Authority and also Judge Mac Gregor  covered up when Dr Sturge said it was ONLY  a hiccoup when medication was not given to him. I will want more than an apology from the LA for the stress it has caused me to have a senior social worker Julie Tadd got away  with lying about my son’s medical history  Addenbrookes evidence going over to GMC will indicate change your attitude or we will not work with you !.

Moving on now ,more  evidence with be backed up by a doctors report  Dr Siva Kuma for court stating the child was well and should not be kept way from contact or treated any other way than like any other normal child.

I have leave to now return back to court  on specific issues concerning this issue which is a general public interest matter when dealing with cancer patients the professionals must take care to get the data & facts right.

I trust this paperwork is based on events it is witnessed by professionals and it has been all put before a court and so far this is the ultimate  result  of 1 parent (DNA half is missing ) being marginalized by a trial by expert witness rules  a paper written by Danya Glaser & Clare Sturge on emotional harm . If facts were checked out for court and my ex-partner’s passport details would show he was abroad for many months of the year working as an itinerant worker on the buildings.

I would like to say all of these facts were overlooked  in favour of a perverse reversal of custody to a violent father .

Just to remind you that this  case is being retained to Nasreen Pearce who has come out of retirement to deal with this matter I look forward to seeing you all back in court .

Yours sincerely

Linda McDermott

CHILDREN — Orders with respect to children — Contact order — Child in interim care of local authority and living with foster parents — Order to maintain contact with stepfather and half brother — Guardian not complying with order — Whether contact order enforceable by committal — Whether local authority in contempt of court if order not obeyed — Whether circuit judge needing to assume powers of High Court judge — Whether jurisdiction to attach penal notice to order — Children Act 1989, s 34 — Family Proceedings Rules 1991, r 4.21A (as substituted by Family Proceedings (Amendment) (No 5) Rules, r 88) — CPR, Sch 2, CCR Ord 29, r 1 In re B (Minors) (Contact Order: Enforcement); [2009] WLR (D) 73 CA: Thorpe, Wall and Moore-Bick LJJ: 27 February 2009 A contact order made under s 34 of the Children Act 1989 in the county court was enforceable by committal for contempt of court, and the court had jurisdiction to attach to a penal notice directed to the local authority in whose care the relevant child was. The Court of Appeal so held when allowing an appeal by the local authority against the decision of Judge Nasreen Pearce, sitting in the Luton County Court on 16 and 23 October 2008, to attach to a contact order made in public law proceedings under s 34 of the Children Act 1989 a penal notice addressed to the local authority stating that, if the order were not obeyed, the local authority would be in contempt of court and the officer responsible for the implementation of the order might be sent to prison. The order required that contact be maintained between a child, who was in the interim care of the local authority and living with foster parents, and her stepfather and half brother. WALL LJ, giving the judgment of the court, said that the judge had the power to enforce by committal the order for contact. R 4.21A of the Family Proceedings Rules 1991, which was concerned with committal for the breach of an order and was directed to private law proceedings, was not exhaustive, but since on its face it was not expressed to apply to orders under s 34 of the 1989 Act, CPR, Sch 2, CCR Ord 29 r 1 was available to fill the gap. It followed that if the court had power to enforce its order by committal, it also had the power to attach to the order a penal notice. It was neither necessary nor appropriate for the circuit judge to assume the powers of a High Court judge under s 9 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 in order to attach a penal notice to a contact order. Since the contact order was now being obeyed the penal notice would be struck out with immediate effect. Accordingly the appeal was dismissed on the question of jurisdiction, but allowed in relation to the continuation of the penal notice.

Appearances: Dermot Main Thompson for the local authority; Marcia Hyde, for the guardian, and Daniel Kingsley, for the stepfather, did not appear but provided position statements in writing of their representative positions.

Reported by: Ben Urdang, barrister.

Subscribe now for full text reports

Brought to you as part of The Daily Law Notes service by the reporters to The Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales, in association with JustCite who provide the cross-reference links.

I have sent this e-mail and for most of you with children in foster care fighting for contact in the Family courts take the LA back to court using this case law.

I would like to thank my MP Kelvin Hopkins for helping me over the last 5 years.  Has it really been 5 years since I lost my case ,I do not care if it takes another 5 years to resolve our case so that the issue for adopted children to find a genetic key is completed.

The last 5 years have been an eye opener to the corruption and money making scam that these courts waste in both time and taxpayers money . Just because they operate in secret  it is now  no secret  the scale of corruption.

I personally think this is  a very important matter and it should be brought to the media attention in the best interests  of the  general public how long it could take to get vital information which could save a child or persons life.

The GMC are now looking at our case ,just what have the professionals done.More to the point what have they not taken into consideration for leaving medical data for my son to find in the future should he come out of remission from leukaemia.

Some would say this is all academic now . This is now 5 long years that after the bog standard rules were applied by Dr Claire Sturge  & Dr  Anthony Wilkins also Graham Flatman Psychologist for that the abnormal illness behaviour labels were applied to me. My son is in remission now , the risks are changing as children get older . This is the evidence that the courts need to deal with now.

These lables are legally sticky taped all over the reports and sent back to my GP’s surgery and the GP accepts what the expert witness has to say surrounding false allegations and maladministration of evidence put before the court  and to this day they are firmly stuck until I find new evidence to support this has never in the past affected my parenting which it has not so I am innocent in the past of any significant risk of causing harm to my child, however something the experts say they saw or read on file which maybe I have not seen yet maybe said to cause significant harm to warrant a removal of my child from me to safe guard him in the future. I wonder what that evidence is and who supplied it and moreover why I can not access this under DPA?

Coming back to DNA and the right to leave or find a genetic key is the biggest skeleton argument ,which is not being used right now. So that is why I decided to take up  the challenge what with a history of so much cancer and the focus of my sons case him having leukaemia .

The solicitors will not touch me now  or discuss this issue ,as it will go against the other experts for court and the  barristers who so cleverly set me up for this label  in the first place. I never admitted this allegation which is to my credit .

Can we move on to this so called personality disorder that so many parents discuss they are labelled with . This is not confirmed only maybe !!. This personality trait  is about as  ”black” as it can get ,when in fact it is clear I am  from an ethnic group of white  people.

So the motto is this: “never forget who you are and where you came from and hold that note forever  as this is your heritage and your legal right to have access to all the paperwork which best describes  as a legal personality , and have held on record a true description of you as an individual. These so called court experts  should not be given a right to trash evidence  in a secret court  or be given protection or anonymity after they have been found out .

This massive legal Human Rights issue is so over looked ,as it is such a horrible matter to have face facts about cancer that most people chicken out ,or switch off from this subject .When they say that 1 in 4 of us are likely to be the next person to get cancer . This opportunity is missed by families and courts alike to make good the law as it stands to bring in changes to improve matters. Instead the courts are chicken now as they chose to carry on hiding facts and covering up their  mistakes .In favour of covering  up  errors .

So much more could be done with the help of science as children have a right to  find data this should be separated data from court cases . The rights of access to birth parents to find a donor which should be addressed is never going to be done  the  the long term interests of children and adults alike . The shame of UK SECRET COURTS IS THIS THEY ARE NOT TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION THE LONG TERM INTEREST OF ADOPTED CHILDREN.

For those parents who are new to all of this I want to say never give in ,even if you think you are NEVER  going to get your children back . I certainly will never be a winner ,there is nothing I want more  than closure and at this price only .That is not too much to ask after the courts legally kidnapped my son is it . The right to know does my child have stem cells stored or can we leave a contact list of members of the family ?

The only positive thing to come out of this is doing something for other families coming through the system and if I did not beleive this possible to do, I would have given up years ago.

Some of these families who are living with cancer and battling to live each day are on Facebook talking about their experience they do not have the energy to campaign for this right to find or leave a genetic key and to be honest the normal families do not care about it as it is not their problem they do not have the cancer experience yet.

So very little of this information is filtering down into the media and most important of all to the general public until it is too late so  these hidden facts surrounding cases in closed court of miscarriage of justice are never being discussed in the open it is too sensitive .

Please never  give up, to either the Social Services, or Cafcass or any professional who has abused their power in their position as a practitioner and then tells you that you can not have copies of all the paperwork for court .

This week has been hectic with skype conference calls listening to another mother who has lost her child and also been asked do you think you have this “abnormal illness behaviour?” This kind of thing is rife in the courts and they are using the excuse a lot , this is also not true that it is rare this problem .

Moving on and giving a shout out to Jane Blogs who runs the Stafford Social Service Blog  ”SO FAR  THIS IS WORKING OUT FOR US “. WELL DONE JANE !

So far SO GOOD. I would like to say a big thank you to Jane Bloggs on Facebook in Staffordshire who can not be named this is her alias as Jane told us or rather showed us  her letters and newspaper story how her own  MP David Kidney support her in a similar p..s take from the Local Authority  when they were also with holding information under the DPA  she requested. My MP is offering to help withme with the P complaints to the Parliamentary Ombudsman ,I am tried of the procedure but it is necessary to show I have exhausted every domestic remedy available before going out to ECHR’s.

Cafcass in Luton now tell me that they have my file after stating they have destroyed the file after an extensive search for this in …… I requested copies of this from them  years ago and also more important put in a complaint that was never dealt with at the time a LG was suppose to be representing my 7 year  son .

The earlier posts on here state Luton Social Services breached the 6th Principle of the DPA when they also failed to give me this information .

When Cafcass finally reply to me telling me that I have exhausted the complaints so I can move on albeit at a snails pace  to bring this to the Parliamentary Ombudsman attention which as Francis on Facebook so rightly  pointed out will now be out of time . I will post both letters on here .

I would like to say congratulations to the barrister on Pink Tape who had her baby at home in the UK somewhere in some leafy suburb where we were once proud to call Great Britain .

Great Britain ,there is nothing great, about a country that  would terrorize a pregnant  mother and her partner to flee to another country and seek political refuge .

The made in “Great Britain “now has a new meaning for  many children who are conceived in the UK and then exported to a different country as their families are targeted by Coram sharks posing as legal representatives in the Family courts working for the social services under the guise they are working for the parents as their defense team.

I wish to also say congratulations to the brave young women who fled to have their babies in Spain as the  babies have recently been born a few days ago  to proud parents who are living in exile. Please spare a thought for these families and pray that they stay safe in Spain out of  reach of draconian laws here in the UK courts .

Here is an example of the rights of 1 child to be born in peaceful surroundings at home, versus another child not to be born at home to a mother set up in closed court,something does not sit right with this at all .

http://pinktape.co.uk/

So I am wondering what kind of legal justice system we have going on there behind closed doors ,what happened inside that  secret court room  that lead up to this couple having to sell all their possessions and go on the run to Spain, for the young mother to finally give birth to her unborn son  last week?

Can the British taxpayer really afford the bill for secrecy in the closed family courts and the after shock cases that are likely  to follow on ?

I would like to ask would this be good enough for your family?

Why are more families avoiding Coram based solicitors ?

Would it be really asking too much ,therefore to end trials by expert witnesses only !

Can we please have a panel of real experts instead of 1 expert witness who is near retirement age ,and prone to chattering  away to themselves whilst waiting to give evidence in court ?

It is now time for the  ”UK  SECRET COURTS” take note ,that just like in the euthanasia cases here in  the UK  we have another clear example of how other desperate families  are  taken up new challenges in an effort to resolve family matters.

The families will continue to go around the law that is finally setting out to rule people in society by destroying their family life  with out of date laws which are not going to reflect the life styles for most families. You will also note I said get around the law not break the law.

It is our shame that we sit back and do nothing about this ,when other countries  show us that they are more civilized and able to take on board the true facts surrounding the paperwork for court is a case of serious maladministration.

There is NO justification for these families who are being persecuted and hunted down like fugitives albeit with no criminal record in such a barbaric way . I want to know this, how much is this costing the taxpayer in the UK to foot the bill for these 2 cases and how much have they had to date to first  assess these families , then to hunt them down.

It also looks like both families are from decent post codes areas which is what we have been saying all along easy targets for social workers. Easy money for forced CORAM adoption !

How much of” CORAM IS PRINTED OVER THEIR PAPERWORK?”

http://www.theyworkforyou.com/video/?from=debate&gid=debate/2010-02-23a.243.2http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/families/article7043475.ece

This firm of solicitors Borneo Linnells who were said to represent my son,what an evil bed fellow Patrick Persusko was when he knowingly  he got into bed with the Social Services ,most important of all please take on board that both interested parties for court   never considered that should my son come out of remission from leukaemia in the future then  contact would be an serious matter or issue  when needing to finding a donor.

The arrogance of these professionals they just done what they know works in court and they done the exact same to us as they do to all families tear you apart, and make sure the contact breaks down  . They never once considered my son had cancer or any other options for his future .

They destroyed  another family whole so that a Non Resident Father could have a relationship with his son. FULL STOP !

The LG  Dale Wood Cafcass officer for court for the child must have done a runner with the file because they will not give it to me .

Would you take a look at these Cafcass Jokers !! They kept the file for private law case in 1999 as this was pulled for court and used in evidence in 2004- 2006.

This said, it was also around this time August 2004 that the expert Dr Sturge  and child’s solicitor Patrick Persusko were labelling me or hinting at the drop down list of things the expert specialized in shall we say.

Dr Sturges name is coming up a lot now in other cases with mothers telling me she is brought in for the final hearing.  Bearing in mind  this expert is so big that she is arrogant to send this fax in the first place .This is  SO leading and it is blatant labelling WITH INTENT !

Fact Finding the problem has to exist first it has to be there in the paperwork , not created for court fact finding which is our experience of closed court  .So let us look again at that fax below The doctor Dr Sturge  has  not read all the bundles, or met me either, the date on the fax and the appointment for meeting them is much later on but she is clearly stating what she is interested in looking at abnormal illness. My child has cancer and she has nothing on me ,I am being done under the criteria for emotional harm only at this stage but it will have to be doubled up to neglect so this 1 shoe will have to fit me too.

After Patrick Persusko (PP isnow a judge in MK) helped Dr Struge to find evidence which were comments left on file historic data that had been left dormant which had no bearing upon my ability to parent or give a good standard of care to my son .

The outcome was damning in so much they used of this historic data, which had no real bearing ,or concern at all about me ,but never the less was used for court to label me with the lighter label of MSBP. Finally all experts had to agree with this ,they said it was abnormal illness behaviour .

When in fact I think they seriously let my son down.The corporate parent& courts alike   should have concentrated on genetics ,and also the long term welfare interests of child C. Surely good old common sense should tell you that if nothing else.

Any decent parent would want to do their best ,or anything to improve matters or put something in for your child,no matter what that was.

Tell me this please do you see anyone representing adopted children to find a genetic key ?I do not see many adopted children being represented in law to find a genetic key.

The corporate parent has not bothered, and the blood parent is too stunned, or far to scared to do anything at all before the final hearing get it in the paperwork  make the solicitors work for their money . I know solicitor drain every ounce of energy out of you,please  do not accept the what is this genetic key they know what it is  ………

This looks to me like serious intent to label me what do you think? and not only that can you see how they are willing to help each too? Frightening to think this pack is waiting with a confident smile on their face for another unsuspecting family to fall into the machine . confident that they will win and you will lose your child .

This paperwork was all contributed to this blog by Coram & Cafcass and you the taxpayer paid for all of this case to the sum of £150 K or more.

These jokers that pass for professionals  better tell me they looked at the long term interests of my son . It is not asking too much that he gets the same chances that other children get when they have access to all of their blood family .

.http://www.waterlowlegal.com/directories/borneo-linnells-solicitors-1403279.ph

Social workers be mindful parents are blogging too. Some like myself  have even gone to the trouble of getting a website hosted in another country. Years ago parents dare not even read the lies that social workers wrote about their families in the paperwork . Now times have changed and we give lessons how to create bundles for court so these children can sue the Local Authority.

How do you think that social worker looks now .Julie Tadd wrote my son was not responding to treatment in 2005. What kind of message it that giving the general public now? My blog statistics were up and 30 + searches were for Julie Tadd  alone. The use of the blogs and the information is filtering down so fast to service users are becoming more informed about who exactly are these individuals working for social services and what are they really up to in child protection?

http://www.communitycare.co.uk/carespace/forums/a-childs-right-to-take-legal-action-what-is-the-6709.aspxAs I’ve recently blogged, much legal work in the UK has been done to promote the right to a child or young person to have their voices heard, from accepting the demands of the UN’s Convention on the Rights of the Child to the implementation of the Local Authority Social Services Department Children’s Representation Procedure [England] Regulations, which required local authorities to feed information on advocacy to young people, as well as explaining the important issues around representation and the complaints procedure.

Recent calls for children to be given the right to take legal action on a council that performs badly have sparked wild debate. Normal 0 false false false EN-GB X-NONE X-NONE Ian Johnston, former chief executive of the British Association of Social Workers, contributed to that debate by saying “here care falls below acceptable standards the children concerned should be entitled to seek redress and the process to secure compensation must be accessible and user friendly.”

Is this the general consensus among those who work in social work?

Take a look at this  a student at University suspended from placement after reading her own file. Trying to get the  general public to wake up about the information being collected , stored and retrieved for court.

I want you to think for a moment what you would do if 1 of these trainee social workers were set lose on your family.I know a mother turned up at the pre -school nursery and her son was kidnapped.

This is the thing they gave us for a social worker Julie Tadd happy in her work so much she has a child to take away with her from the care pool whenever she wants. http://www.communitycare.co.uk/carespace/forums/suspension-from-a-placement-6655.aspx

Do You ever ask yourself WHY  you  TRUSTED  and signed the working agreement document with Social Services?

I trusted the Social Services ,solicitors and courts to be honest . So I completely opened the door to my home and worked with the social workers in good faith,that was in April 2004 – February 2005   the early days, simply because that was the kind of person I was , that person has  I am glad to say died a shocking death in 2006 and paid a hefty price for making this mistake.

Since then I have moved on to 2009 and I said I will not work with Social Services or courts even if that means I will get back my child,and this said I will not take this back that is how strong I feel ,and who can blame me for  taking  a much more  cynical  attitude , also  a hardline approach is very much needed when working with these  professionals. I would doubt a solicitor  or a social worker would dare try it on with me again .

So by the time they finished stitching me up in a closed court , the working relationship if that was the title you could give to it  was anything but that, working with us  was a very difficult experience quoted Dale Wood Cafcass legal guardian to my son.

It would be unfair, to say that I had a good working arrangement with this social worker for a lot of reasons, the biggest reason was she personalized the case from the start, and she also had a very deformed and twisted mind. I found her child like , and very petty and very scruffy to be seen out with in the community I hated the stares people would look at her  trailing around 3 paces behind us  ……….

She would  ideally want to be in my house early in the morning , saying “I am outside your door”, tough I am on the bus in 3 roads up from where you are parked up or watching her do her 15 minutes work out in the  same gym I was going to . I refused to speak to her in the end , hung up on her ,would not go in a room with her at Unity House the more you talked the more they lied about what you said, she even tried to get an injunction out against me saying hello to her in the changing rooms of the gym. She never succeeded ,as the judge said it would scare my son to know I was in prison.

She told Judge Mac Gregor she was scared of me ,and wanted an injunction, she had good reason to be scared she knew I was on to her and she was a liar. Julie Tadd knew her game was up ,as much as she tried to wind up me or my eldest son we laughed at her  for it. At the final hearing she waited for the drama of screaming match to start and again she never got it ,so  when she and her side kick Sharon Andrews expected me to fall to bits, or collapse I retreated and went on holiday ,if the professionals went on holiday I went on holiday . I did say in court to her I could kiss you ,you know ,as I thank her  for doing everything you have done. I now have a much better life than you…. .Her face was a picture when I said this , this process is all about destroying a persons world . I will never forget her face when I said this to her, she let it slip the face was gutted, she turns around in Debenham’s to get a good look at me when she sees me in town. I let her as she can look take a good look at all the hours wasted and thousands of taxpayers money on the mother who never went down for nothing at all.

The working agreement was never signed again , the expert was never trusted either , if she asked to see me again which she did after the final hearing was over , I took my  solicitor with me.I learned to suss people  out in my environment very quickly,also what they wanted from me or wanted me to do next . I questioned the cost of it all and how much it was bankrupting me to continue with working with the courts for so long .

If I was to survive the court experience I needed to function on the same level as them without emotion I soon got sick of being played my friend said they are so predictable.

It has sadly left me with no respect for professionals ,and I  will never completely   trust anyone again after this ,and who can blame me for this I have been abused by all and sundry .I would also have to say that this,  the whole CLOSED  court experience  has hardened me up,much more than I ever expected I would dare to admit too. I got asked a few weeks ago by a doctor if I was a social worker and I can talk like I have no child  without the emotion . So think again if you are heading to the Family courts trust no one. As these respectable professionals  can and will  use you,simply  just because they can get away with it in a secret court.

I was probably no different than the next person to trust a professional . The general public put their  trust in the multi-agency groups and expect them to be honest,and do their job.

It was our experience that they were anything but honest or even cared about the children in their line of duty.

The foster carer was not much different it was for her all about the money. I got the odd homemade card or present a few sweets that are in a box with so many kisses and I love you Mum on the paperwork just does not add up. The foster carer said that my son never asked about me or asked when he would see me next.Then again it is very good money for a special needs child some say £500 a week all in plus petrol so you work out if it pays to tell the truth especially if you have a child who is sick and can not fight back .

What must the children think about their parents , little do they know they have had contact stopped for no reason whilst they settle 3 months nothing not a phone call, or your Easter egg is sitting on the social workers desk for 3 months until it had gone green moldy.

Or how they stop the mothers contact and force a child to go see dad whether  they have expressly wished not to go does not matter.The expert witness says she has specific wishes how this must be done.

Someone said to me it is amazing how long they will keep this up covering up the lies the perjury an most of all protecting the professionals who write this stuff for court.

If somebody else is reading this did you have this social worker Julie Tadd? and did you get nowhere with your complaints . Please can somebody tell me if they know if she also came out of the systems care pool ? Was she put in care as a child? This could explain a lot and why she was off work for 1 year after taking a beautiful child out of the care pool.

I did ask Kelvin Hopkins can he find out how many social workers in Luton take away children and go on maternity leave for 1 year ? I also want to know do they put the children back in the pool and start again when they have to go missing for a long time when they are the centre of a dodgy case like ours was .

I have just found some solicitor having a rant on Pink Tape about photocopying  copies of court orders for LIP clients for court.http://pinktape.co.uk/

This is priceless to think this rant is justified ,when the  truth of the matter is,  life is difficult enough being LIP  ,not to mention the added  financial burden of costs for court that nobody dare mentions just incase they end up contributing towards the costs themselves. See JFF Forum they have funds for this now or so somebody told me to put in a claim for expenses.

So the other side of the coin  for both the  person who is LIP or the MKF  who truth be known is , that they to are possibly  still left living or existing on the poverty line after being subjected to the long term stress of the case which is above and beyond what any family should have to pay the costs both in terms of financially or otherwise.

This will be more likely to be the case when a parent  has over time had a lot of stress above and beyond  inflicted upon the m as an applicant trapped in  the legal system by length of the time the  original case started.

This will be more than likely be  dragged out for at least 42 weeks .It is not surprising after the case is dragged out ,the court case has  now impacted upon the applicants  health.Let’s face it you would be sick after losing your house,and your  your job hen your child this is the correct order to put this in some kind of perspective for you. In a desperate attempt to get a fair trial in a Kangeroo court, by the time it dawns on you you have no chance with  most solicitors as you try to come to terms the amount of  pre -trial appointments for court ,directions hearings other legal hustles , the legal pursuit to get your children home in a no win situation in  a closed court most of these solicitors by now you wish you were in a criminal court for shooting them as you try to get rid of  a dead weight around your neck ,and the sooner you drop them the better especially if they are Coram based firm of solicitors or Judges. You will be hard pushed to get your full fares for travel to court  paid by Coram solicitors.

Then watch out for the pitfalls of being asked to perform for a LIP as a Mackezie Friend.

As a MKF you will find that you are spending more time doing the donkey work by  trying to encourage the LIP to  type  out a statement.You will end up doing this as they are not up to it, or won’t, or can’t do it. It has been my experience to never have a moment free since our case and doing what can best be described as doing the form like a taxi driver tearing round London at rush hour,when all you really want to do it catch up on gardening or have some time out to read a book ,but you get caught out  time & time again by  the fone ringing, or a message in your inbox some other MKF asking you to do a favour for someone who is  you find out  (not all are like this just some ) an ungrateful, lying, scheming client, who another MKF has said they have nobody else step will you step in?

Then  see what thanks you get for stepping in ,or the grief you get later on for spending your gas money which you had put aside only to   find out only when you are sat in court  the client has been all talk.

This is another hidden costs to  going to court the serious cost of disappointment ,  you will find out that even though these people can be very   presentable ,they are  also very consistent in their efforts and they can go on to manipulate many more people after  you depart and make your apologies to the court for not being able to stomach another day of reading the facts surrounding the case.

Please  whatever you do,do  not try to go there with me , trying to “re-classify child abuse with me won’t wash.” I have got very wary of people after my experience and this is so sad, as there are some very worthy cases out there ,and  genuine people suffering in silence ,but due to users & players knowing how to monopolize and also polarize the groups this is causing more harm  than good to the campaign groups  .

Moving on to the paperwork the magic bundles of paperwork , and it is only when you are finally in court sat next to them and see the bundles and I mean a sly  quick look if you are so lucky ,this will be  at break time or when they run down the nearest chip shop for a greasy feed at lunch break, and leave you there to look after the bundles , only then you see for yourself ,that this  case was indeed justified in removing the children who were at risk do you realize what a waste of your time,& money not to mention resources this has been.

My advice is this,   if you get a phone call to go in as a MKF at short notice be  very wary  ,do watch out for  being used like a skivvie all day long to carry bundles to court when the client is well able  and perfectly capable to carry the bundles themselves and  note is a man suppose to be the stronger sex! ( but it will look so much better for them if they have a joey in tow and also be wary of your clients asking you to do this:  most of these clients want you to use a dictaphone and record the court session  for them as the transcribes costs a small mortgage to get hold of post final hearing.)

Is that  the kind of  friend you need asking you to break the law, and how far will you go in your duty as a MKF depends entirely  on you  ?Some people expect far too much out of a MKF that is a FACT !

We mostly  carry laptops and are  often refused to use them in court for typing documents up for clients,   most judges will   refuse to let us  use them in court,but they sit using their laptops .In Barnett court 1 barrister pointed out for the judge that they  are wi fi the local authority barrister was most put out ,as they  do not want their dirty insider hustles being picked up by some passer by with a lap top .

Another case I spent nearly £250  towards  travel and stay over in a hotel  at £95 a night, plus my train fare, which is not like  a hell of a lot money  to some people ,but considerably a lot  more than £20 than this solicitor moaning about costs , but it is a lot if you are not working ,which  may I remind this solicitor she is working and getting paid for.  I am not working, and I have nobody who I can claim this money back from which is an important point I am raising at least this is saving the taxpayer money and families are having a go at LIP  .I can  not claim it back from the courts or expect the client to cover the costs  I think it kind of makes you look very mean spirited on maybe £75 an hour solicitors  fee ,this is to the Miss Pink moaner on Pink Tape blog £5 a sheet for a court order…….

Enough said,LIP was said  recently to have gone up 70%

The bottom line is this ,  I can tell you it is  a real struggle for most MKF’s if anything like myself it will be  something like my  gas bill money spent on supporting a person who is  LIP but LIP is here to stay now the legal profession will be lucky to have a job left to moan about if this keeps up .

There is in all fairness a real community spirit going for families ,enough for other families to pull out all the stops  and to prevent the legal professionals robbing the public  gravy train purse. Why should families put up with bad service , when they are  never represent by the firm of solicitors who are whole heartedly or are willing to  fight their  cases, so this LIP & MKF just kind of brings about an equal sense of chaos back to the courts which they so rightly deserve.

All that law and it is how they use it in secret ,if families have  no right to justice they might  as well be to go LIP  it is nothing but a bare knuckle fight  with no respect for either side , and a few odd cases laws quoted for good measure.

Oh and finally when you have your baby Miss Pinky  think about the poor mother on YT giving birth screaming in pain and then in court the next day fighting for a return home of her baby , this mother never moans about the £5 costs she just wants to document the crime and show what goes on in a closed court.

I just want to give Pain Alison Stephens  her chance to have her say .

If you have the same problem .Just want to have a say ? leave it here if you get deleted  if I get time I will do this for you .

http://www.lyndamac.com/

The flip side of forced adoption ,this is when you are clearly removing a grandparents rights to look after their own flesh & blood, in favour of foster care, gay mens rights to have a family first.

http://thedaddydiaries.wordpress.com/

I got asked by Tim Loughton were is the incentive for adoption? I e-mailed him back the figures pulled from FOA or DOP Act for each council .Here in our town grandparents are talking about adoption. The Children Act 1989 skims the extended family as it leap frogs right over them as an option to care for children. As A Children’s Rights Campaigner I am deluged with parents & grandparents ringing me writing to me sending up reports which have been penned by 3rd party to put before a court which are based on wrong facts. Some are committing perjury to procure a child for adoption. Here is an incentive for you a special needs child is a golden child to a foster carer. I have a copy of minutes of a placement meeting the FC advised the child never asked to see the mother. I tracked down this in a solicitors office. Cross reference this with a welfare court report the child she is misrepresenting the truth about the child’s true wishes & feelings. The child had leukaemia he has lost all contact with extended family. Should he come out of remission the mother does not have knowledge if they have a donor or stem cells stored. How do I know all of this ? I am that mother who has seen it all read other parents nightmare. I have also met the other families in the other national news paper.The stories of families on the run from having another baby snatched still keep coming……. I hope to bench mark the case so that adopted children can have access to all the medical history , not just the selected stuff that looks good for court .You will need all of it for life . Every child matters we all have a right to life.

http://profiles.yahoo.com/blog/YLNO5CTOZVFBI57O3SP2NXQQMU?eid=0qb0za5kmntqJ93uElI.UnGGEJVa9BjEGQYolXdi0A5KnZRQ8Q

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/chat/r/t-9805973/p-1/index.html?threadIndex=1&class=thanks

http://parentsagainstinjustice.ning.com/profiles/blogs/daily-mail-forced-adoption?xg_source=activity

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/specials/times_appeal/article6965610.ece

I just find myself drawn to the insane world of child protection and the dangerous world of adoption for children. I can not  for the life of me fathom out what it is these adoptive families have to offer children as I read these comments on the AdoptionUK org. The comments I have pulled from this site,  well I am lost for words. You might  want to read them for your self and make up your own mind. Or is it me, this is the flip side of the “The Fluffy Adoption ” the depressing side of what it is really really like to adopt a child with attachment problems warts and all…..

We will never know the full history of the family , the adopted parents will not know either which should now send the alarm  bells ringing now on medical or mental health problems for the child/adult in the future, as it has been established that there is never a full medical history going over with the child.

I dare not even go there, thinking about  what kind of adults these traumatized children will go on to be  like when they reach adulthood . This is after the corporate parent has exercised it’s full power and parental control  over these  poor misfortunate children who were being  left to be looked after by the state,especially as some of these babies have bonded with  their biological parents for god knows how long,before closed adoption.

You often hear children have  a voice this is just not so ! This just makes me so angry  that Cafcass also Legal Guardians & Foster Carers are allowed to get away with a conflict of interest . This is when they advise other professionals at placement  in meetings of what they say,” the children are saying “. Sometimes these professionals can be found out, for shall we say, for want of a better word misrepresenting  a child’s true wishes & feelings when you cross reference the welfare reports for court. This is what I found in our case.

Now that sounds so much better than say turning up for a meeting and lying through your back teeth to hold on to an easy earner of say £500 – £800 per week for a special needs child.

Take a look at the problems these children have with attachment when they are adopted. Is it any wonder that there is a history of depression in children suppressed in a forced adoption world simply because the government made funds available for fast track adoption. If we look close enough we would be able to see the start of the depression when you read on the forum the babies are upset and will not chew their food properly. My comments were removed as I said the mother is the same you can not eat properly due to a living bereavement or what is know as a separation  anxiety from your child . Not sure what they system is trying to do intervene and stop emotional retardation or cause it . This also  smacks of the beginning of early mental health problems for young children .The adopted parents look to me like they are also being used for this experiment in causing trauma to children and seeing if they will bond with strangers.

What ever it is doing it will need sorting with drugs and counseling  which is going to be good for business.

Garden Said:www.AdoptionUK.org

Well done.  And it’s this sort of thing which proves that a lot of getting our children ‘better’ comes down to the way we manage them.  I know that if I drop my guard for a moment then things go very wrong round here – it’s a full time job just reading the signs and pre-empting the behaviours.

Younger dd has been having a ‘headache’ lately, but it tends to disappear when she wants it to.  I am diagnosing sadness over birth family and responding with TLC.  Big sister is acting out all over the place so we are being very firm with her but reminding her how much we love her and talking about her birth mother.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/education/article6974590.ece

Problems with 3 year old not talking .

(Maybe they know something we do not know,like what is the point when you have all of these people  to do the talking for you . Where was this survey done in birth parents homes or adopted parents homes?)

Ella Said: AdoptionUK.org

Ella and I shared a room at the Childrens’ Home. Sometimes Ella would have “a sad day” and we would retreat to our room. I would sit with her feeding her chocolate, sometimes brushing her hair or just listening to her.  The staff kept an eye on us every half hour or so as it all built up to a crisis. Ella would then start to cry which made me cry which would then shock her out of being sad about herself!

http://www.adoptionuk.org/message.asp?topic=33665
We would then share a shower – “to wash away the sadness” – and life would return to normal. I think we each acted as a therapist for the other.